Summary
Anecdotally, female plastic surgeons are disproportionately underrepresented as speakers,
moderators, and panelists at national and regional plastic surgery meetings. No studies
have attempted to quantify female representation at Plastic Surgery The Meeting (PSTM).
The objective of our study is to examine trends in female participation at PSTM. Names
of participating plastic surgeons and their conference positions were obtained from
PSTM meeting programs between 2015-2020. Conference positions included instructor,
lead, lecturer, moderator, panelist, or other. Presentations were grouped as the following:
conference/symposium; general session; instructional course; and lab. An automated
gender assignment tool (gender-api.com) was used to determine the gender of participants.
Descriptive statistics and trend analyses using Cochran-Armitage trend tests were
performed. Between 2015-2020, 3,382 individuals (602 females, 17.8%) presented at
PSTM in one of the instructional or moderating roles. Female presenters at PSTM increased
from 60 (12.4%) in 2015, to 155 (26.5%) by 2020. The results for the proportion of
females presenting in the general session and the instructional courses were statistically
significant (p < .0001; p =.029), demonstrating a positive linear trend in the female proportions over the
years. From 2015 to 2020, the proportions of females holding positions as moderators,
panelists, and “other” increased significantly (p = .011; p = .011; p < .0001). Although female participation at PSTM has shown substantial growth over the
last five years, there still exists a considerable gender imbalance. Notably, females
were less likely to hold prominent positions, such as instructors, leads, or lecturers.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- 2019 State physician workforce data report.AAMC. 2019;
- Gender bias in the integrated plastic surgery residency.Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 2020; 8: e2581https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000002581
- Diversity in plastic surgery.Ann Plastic Surg. 2020; 84: S278-S282https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000002209
- Uneven progress in gender equality at plastic surgery conferences: lessons from a decade of meetings.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; 149: 581e-589ehttps://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009040
- National GME census in GME track.AAMC. 2019;
Article info
Publication history
Published online: October 14, 2022
Accepted:
October 11,
2022
Received:
September 6,
2022
Footnotes
Previous Presentations: ACAPS Winter Meeting February 2022.
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Trends in gender representation among plastic surgery award recipientsJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic SurgeryVol. 79
- PreviewIn October 2022, Stewart et al. published a communication in this journal on female participation at Plastic Surgery The Meeting in the years 2015–2020.1 They discovered that female participation increased significantly during this interval (p < .001), however females were considerably less likely to hold prominent positions in conference leadership. We sought to further the work of Stewart et al. by describing the gender distribution in awards granted by major plastic surgery societies in the United States.
- Full-Text
- Preview