Advertisement

How to Attract Our Future? - Perception of Plastic Surgery Among Medical Students

Published:August 23, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.08.059

      Abstract

      Background

      There is a mounting body of evidence that underscores the worldwide and US national need for increased plastic surgery recruitment of trainees. Thus, plastic surgery must attract more applicants while maintaining the high-level qualifications of residency candidates.

      Methods

      Two hundred and fifty (w = 197) medical students rated the prototypical plastic surgeon (PS), general practitioner (GP) and craniomaxillofacial surgeon (CMF) with respect to traits derived from a literature review on general perception of surgery, favorability, and their intention to pursue a respective career.

      Results

      Factor analysis yielded two overarching dimensions of prototype perception in addition to femininity and resilience, one reflecting a coldhearted, narcissistic, competitive character (status primacy; SP) and one reflecting role-model-like traits (hard-working, healthy, admired & empathetic). Prototypical PSs scored significantly higher on SP than GPs (t(249) = 18.72, p < 0.001, d = 1.26) and CMFs (t(249) = 5.73, p < 0.001, d = 0.36), while receiving significantly less positive evaluations (GP: t(249) = -9.93, p < 0.001, d = -0.63; CMF: t(249) = -3.52, p < 0.001, d = -0.22). The higher participants rated PSs on SP, the more likely a career in plastic surgery was excluded (OR = 0.71, p = 0.03). An opposite relationship with femininity approached significance (OR = 1.32, p = 0.06).

      Conclusions

      Given the growing need for plastic surgeons, worldwide and US national task fields have to overcome the outdated traits and highlight the field's pro-bono engagement. Furthermore, plastic surgery should further expand its leading role in promoting female trainees.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Meara J.G.
        • et al.
        Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development.
        The Lancet. 2015; 386: 569-624
        • Bauder A.R.
        • et al.
        Geographic Variation in Access to Plastic Surgeons.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2016; 76: 238-243
        • Bauder A.R.
        • et al.
        The Relationship Between Geographic Access to Plastic Surgeons and Breast Reconstruction Rates Among Women Undergoing Mastectomy for Cancer.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2017; 78: 324-329
        • Anderson S.R.
        • et al.
        Geographic Variation in Breast Reconstruction Modality Use Among Women Undergoing Mastectomy.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2019; 82: 382-385
        • Yang J.
        • et al.
        The impending shortage and cost of training the future plastic surgical workforce.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2014; 72: 200-203
      1. More surgeons must start doing basic science.
        Nature. 2017; 544: 393-394
        • Oleck N.C.
        • et al.
        Relevance of Academic Productivity in the Assessment of Integrated Plastic Surgery Applicants.
        J Surg Educ. 2020; 77: 1429-1439
        • Asaad M.
        • et al.
        The history and heritage of the plastic surgery research council.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019; 72: 1576-1606
        • Sepehripour S.
        • Dheansa B.S.
        Wasted research time and its impact on training in plastic surgery.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019; 72: e19
        • Foster S.
        Can we reduce the risk of burnout?.
        Br J Nurs. 2021; 30: 763
        • Chaput B.
        • et al.
        Professional Burnout Among Plastic Surgery Residents: Can it be Prevented? Outcomes of a National Survey.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2015; 75: 2-8
        • Yu J.L.
        • et al.
        Resident experiences with virtual education during the COVID-19 crisis.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021; 74: 1931-1971
        • Daniels K.M.
        • et al.
        The Scale-Up of the Global Surgical Workforce: Can Estimates be Achieved by 2030?.
        World J Surg. 2020; 44: 1053-1061
        • Schultz K.P.
        • et al.
        Integrated Plastic Surgery Applicant Review: Important Factors and Selection Criteria. Plastic and reconstructive surgery.
        Global open. 2020; 8: e2892
        • Ward B.
        • et al.
        How many manuscripts: An analysis of medical student publications in the integrated plastic surgery match.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020; 73: 983-1007
        • Patel A.
        Defeating the negative stereotypes of plastic surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 116e-117e
        • Panayi A.C.
        • et al.
        Lights, camera, scalpel: a lookback at 100 years of plastic surgery on the silver screen.
        Eur J Plast Surg. 2021; : 1-11
        • Gibbons F.X.
        • et al.
        Reasoned action and social reaction: willingness and intention as independent predictors of health risk.
        Journal of personality and social psychology. 1998; 74: 1164
        • Ehrlinger J.
        • et al.
        Do gender differences in perceived prototypical computer scientists and engineers contribute to gender gaps in computer science and engineering?.
        Sex roles. 2018; 78: 40-51
        • Niedenthal P.M.
        • Cantor N.
        • Kihlstrom J.F.
        Prototype matching: a strategy for social decision making.
        Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985; 48: 575
        • Gibbons F.X.
        • Gerrard M.
        • McCoy S.B.
        Prototype perception predicts (lack of) pregnancy prevention.
        Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1995; 21: 85-93
        • Zimmermann F.
        • Sieverding M.
        Young adults' social drinking as explained by an augmented theory of planned behaviour: The roles of prototypes, willingness, and gender.
        British journal of health psychology. 2010; 15: 561-581
        • Azizzadeh A.
        • et al.
        Factors influencing career choice among medical students interested in surgery.
        Current surgery. 2003; 60: 210-213
        • Harendza S.
        • Pyra M.
        Just fun or a prejudice?–physician stereotypes in common jokes and their attribution to medical specialties by undergraduate medical students.
        BMC medical education. 2017; 17: 1-8
        • Linn B.S.
        • Zeppa R.
        Does surgery attract students who are more resistant to stress?.
        Annals of surgery. 1984; 200: 638
        • Peel J.K.
        • Schlachta C.M.
        • Alkhamesi N.A.
        A systematic review of the factors affecting choice of surgery as a career.
        Canadian Journal of Surgery. 2018; 61: 58
        • Haddock G.
        • Zanna M.P.
        Preferring “housewives” to “feminists”: Categorization and the favorability of attitudes toward women.
        Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1994; 18: 25-52
        • Cattell R.B.
        The scree test for the number of factors.
        Multivariate behavioral research. 1966; 1: 245-276
        • Cragg J.G.
        Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods.
        Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. 1971; : 829-844
        • Core Team, R.
        R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
        R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna2013
        • Lupon E.
        • et al.
        The perception of plastic surgery by physiotherapists: a French national descriptive study.
        Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8: 184
        • Heidekrueger P.I.
        • et al.
        [A critical analysis of perception of plastic surgery in Germany].
        Chirurg. 2019; 90: 211-222
        • Tanna N.
        • et al.
        Professional perceptions of plastic and reconstructive surgery: what primary care physicians think.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 643-650
        • Kidd T.
        • et al.
        Attitudes, Influences and Perceptions towards Plastic Surgery amongst Medical Students.
        JPRAS Open. 2021; 29: 167-177
        • Figus A.
        • et al.
        Interplast Italy: a 20-year plastic and reconstructive surgery humanitarian experience in developing countries.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1340-1348
        • McIntyre J.K.
        • et al.
        Predictors, Quality Markers, and Economics of Volunteering Internationally: Results from a Comprehensive Survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons Members.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140: 617-626
        • Davis C.R.
        • et al.
        How to train plastic surgeons of the future.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016; 69: 1134-1140
      2. Boyle, P. Nation's physician workforce evolves: more women, a bit older, and toward different specialties. 2021.

        • Garza R.M.
        • Weston J.S.
        • Furnas H.J.
        Pregnancy and the Plastic Surgery Resident.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139: 245-252
        • Klifto K.M.
        • et al.
        Women Continue to Be Underrepresented in Surgery: A Study of AMA and ACGME Data from 2000 to 2016.
        J Surg Educ. 2020; 77: 362-368