Advertisement

Breast reconstruction using the Latissimus Dorsi Flap and Immediate Fat Transfer (LIFT): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Published:August 22, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.08.025

      Summary

      Background

      Despite several efforts have been made to increase the volume of the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap, few studies have reported the outcomes of LD flap and immediate fat transfer (LIFT) to restore a natural native breast appearance during the initial reconstructive procedure. The aim of this study was to report the different surgical techniques used when implementing LIFT for breast reconstruction and evaluate the postoperative outcomes.

      Methods

      A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE®, and Scopus. We included articles reporting postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent breast reconstruction with LIFT.

      Results

      We included nineteen studies reporting outcomes of 704 breast reconstructions with LIFT (57.09%). The average age and BMI of patients were 51 years and 26.01 kg/m2. The pooled rate of patients requiring additional fat grafting following LIFT was 64.9% (95% CI 43.3%-86.5%). The overall pooled incidence of total flap loss was 3% (95% CI <0%-7.2%), wound-related complications was 14.5% (95% CI 7.3%-21.7%), seroma was 18.2% (95% CI 5.1%-31.2%), and fat necrosis was 14.5% (95% CI 4.5%-24.4%). When compared with abdominal free flaps, we found a significantly lower risk difference of developing wound-related complications favoring LIFT (RD, 0.066; 95%CI 0.004–0.129; p = 0.038).

      Conclusions

      LIFT offers a totally autologous, less morbid type of reconstruction in breast cancer patients who are not ideal candidates for reconstruction with free tissue transfer. However, immediate fat transfer during reconstruction with the LD flap does not eliminate the need for further fat grafting.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • d'Este S.
        La technique de l'amputation de la mamelle pour carcinoma mammaire.
        Rev Chir. 1912; 45: 164
        • Mushin O.P.
        • Myers P.L.
        • Langstein H.N.
        Indications and controversies for complete and implant-enhanced latissimus dorsi breast reconstructions.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2018; 45: 75-81https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2017.08.006
        • Ciudad P.
        • Manrique O.J.
        • Bustos S.S.
        • et al.
        The modified extended fleur-de-lis latissimus dorsi flap for various complex multi-directional large soft and bone tissue reconstruction.
        Cureus. 2020; 12: e6974https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6974
        • Taminato M.
        • Tomita K.
        • Nomori M.
        • et al.
        Fat-augmented latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for total breast reconstruction: A report of 54 consecutive Asian cases.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021; 74: 1213-1222https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.089
        • Germann G.
        • Steinau H.U.
        Breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 97: 519-526https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199603000-00004
        • Clough K.B.
        • Louis-Sylvestre C.
        • Fitoussi A.
        • Couturaud B.
        • Nos C.
        Donor site sequelae after autologous breast reconstruction with an extended latissimus dorsi flap.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109: 1904-1911https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200205000-00020
        • Jeon B.-.J.
        • Lee T.-.S.
        • Lim S.-.Y.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for donor-site seroma formation after immediate breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap: A statistical analysis of 120 consecutive cases.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2012; 69: 145-147https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182259337
        • Sinna R.
        • Delay E.
        • Garson S.
        • Delaporte T.
        • Toussoun G.
        Breast fat grafting (lipomodelling) after extended latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction: A preliminary report of 200 consecutive cases.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63: 1769-1777https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.12.002
        • Thekkinkattil D.K.
        • Salhab M.
        • McManus P.L.
        Feasibility of autologous fat transfer for replacement of implant volume in complicated implant-assisted latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2015; 74: 397-402https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182a6adfc
        • Sood R.
        • Easow J.M.
        • Konopka G.
        • Panthaki Z.J.
        Latissimus dorsi flap in breast reconstruction: Recent innovations in the workhorse flap.
        Cancer Control. 2018; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274817744638
        • Page M.J.
        • McKenzie J.E.
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • et al.
        The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
        BMJ. 2021; 372: n71https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
        • Inthout J.
        • Ioannidis J.P.
        • Borm G.F.
        The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14: 25
        • Riley R.D.
        • Higgins J.P.T.
        • Deeks J.J.
        Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses.
        BMJ. 2011; : 342
        • VanderWeele T.J.
        • Vansteelandt S.
        Odds ratios for mediation analysis for a dichotomous outcome.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2010; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq332
        • Higgins J.P.T.
        • Green S.
        Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011
        • Deeks J.
        • Higgins J.
        • Altman D.
        Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses.
        in: Higgins JPT Green S Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 (March 11)
        • Egger M.
        • Smith G.D.
        • Schneider M.
        • Minder C.
        Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.
        Br Med J. 1997; 315: 629-634
        • Sterne J.A.
        • Hernán M.A.
        • Reeves B.C.
        • et al.
        ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.
        BMJ. 2016; 355: i4919https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
        • Murad M.H.
        • Sultan S.
        • Haffar S.
        • Bazerbachi F.
        Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports.
        Evid Based Med. 2018; 23: 60-63
        • Durieux N.
        • Pasleau F.
        • Howick J.
        • OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group
        The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence.
        2011 (Group. Published online)
        • Palve J.
        • Luukkaala T.
        • Kääriäinen M.
        Comparison of different techniques in latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction: Plain, immediately lipofilled, and implant enhanced.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2022; 88: 20-24https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002798
        • Streit L.
        • Dražan L.
        • Schneiderová M.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative fat grafting into the pectoralis and latissimus dorsi muscles – Novel modification of autologous breast reconstruction with extended latissimus dorsi flap.
        Acta Chir Plast. 2017; 59: 72-81
        • Marcos Quispe J.L.
        Autologous breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap and microfat grafting.
        Cir plást iberolatinoam. 2017; 43: 293-303https://doi.org/10.4321/S0376-78922017000400011
        • Economides J.M.
        • Song D.H.
        Latissimus Dorsi and Immediate Fat Transfer (LIFT) for complete autologous breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018; 6: e1656https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001656
        • Brondi R.S.
        • de Oliveira V.M.
        • Bagnoli F.
        • Mateus E.F.
        • Rinaldi J.F.
        Autologous breast reconstruction with the latissimus dorsi muscle with immediate fat grafting: Long-term results and patient satisfaction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2019; 82: 152-157https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001764
        • Maitani K.
        • Tomita K.
        • Taminato M.
        • Kubo T.
        Scarless total breast reconstruction with a fat-augmented latissimus dorsi flap.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9: e3887https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003887
        • Santanelli di Pompeo F.
        • Laporta R.
        • Sorotos M.
        • Pagnoni M.
        • Falesiedi F.
        • Longo B.
        Latissimus dorsi flap for total autologous immediate breast reconstruction without implants.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134 (871e–879e)https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000859
        • Novak M.D.
        • Blough J.T.
        • Abraham J.T.
        • et al.
        Breast reconstruction in obese patients: The fat grafted latissimus versus abdominal free tissue transfer.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020; 8: e2668https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002668
        • Demiri E.C.
        • Tsimponis A.
        • Pagkalos A.
        • et al.
        Fat-augmented latissimus dorsi versus deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: Comparative study in delayed autologous breast reconstruction.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021; 37: 208-215https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716348
        • Demiri E.C.
        • Dionyssiou D.D.
        • Tsimponis A.
        • Goula C.-.O.
        • Pavlidis L.C.
        • Spyropoulou G.-.A.
        Outcomes of Fat-Augmented Latissimus Dorsi (FALD) flap versus implant-based latissimus dorsi flap for delayed post-radiation breast reconstruction.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018; 42: 692-701https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1081-6
        • Couto-González I.
        • Vila I.
        • Brea-García B.
        • et al.
        Safety of large-volume immediate fat grafting for latissimus dorsi-only breast reconstruction: Results and related complications in 95 consecutive cases.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021; 45: 64-75https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01882-0
        • Black C.K.
        • Zolper E.G.
        • Economides J.M.
        • Abadeer A.
        • Fan K.L.
        • Song D.H.
        Comparison of the pedicled latissimus dorsi flap with immediate fat transfer versus abdominally based free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 146 (137e–146e)https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007027
        • Ahmed Y.S.
        • Abd El Maksoud W.M.
        • Sultan M.H.
        • El-Bakoury E.A
        Latissimus dorsi flap enhancement by lipofilling as an immediate breast reconstruction technique for skin-preserving mastectomy.
        Breast J. 2021; 27: 222-230https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.14116
        • Taglialatela Scafati S.
        • Cavaliere A.
        • Aceto B.
        • Somma F.
        • Cremone L.
        Combining autologous and prosthetic techniques: The breast reconstruction scale principle.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017; 5: e1602https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001602
        • Johns N.
        • Fairbairn N.
        • Trail M.
        • et al.
        Autologous breast reconstruction using the immediately lipofilled extended latissimus dorsi flap.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018; 71: 201-208https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.10.015
        • Piat J.-.M.
        • Tomazzoni G.
        • Giovinazzo V.
        • Dubost V.
        • Maiato A.P.
        • Ho Quoc C.
        Lipofilled mini dorsi flap: An efficient less invasive concept for immediate breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2020; 85: 369-375https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002237
        • Zhu L.
        • Mohan A.T.
        • Vijayasekaran A.
        • et al.
        Maximizing the volume of latissimus dorsi flap in autologous breast reconstruction with simultaneous multisite fat grafting.
        Aesthetic Surg J. 2016; 36: 169-178https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv173
        • Cha H.G.
        • Kwon J.G.
        • Kim E.K.
        Shaping an anatomical breast using extended latissimus dorsi flap and lipofilling in immediate breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2020; 85: 476-480https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002295
        • Hudson D.A.
        Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2004; 52: 15-21https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000099962.79156.16
        • Nahabedian M.Y.
        Achieving ideal breast aesthetics with autologous reconstruction.
        Gland Surg. 2015; 4: 134-144https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.03.03
        • Khouri R.K.
        • Rigotti G.
        • Cardoso E.
        • Khouri R.K.J.
        • Biggs T.M.
        Megavolume autologous fat transfer: Part I. Theory and principles.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133: 550-557https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000438044.06387.2a
        • Khouri R.K.
        • Rigotti G.
        • Cardoso E.
        • Khouri R.K.J.
        • Biggs T.M.
        Megavolume autologous fat transfer: Part II. Practice and techniques.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133: 1369-1377https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000179
        • Ho Quoc C.
        • Taupin T.
        • Guérin N.
        • Delay E.
        Volumetric evaluation of fat resorption after breast lipofilling.
        Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2015; 60: 495-499https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2015.06.011
        • Shi Y.
        • Yuan Y.
        • Dong Z.
        • Gao J.
        • Lu F.
        The fate of fat grafts in different recipient areas: Subcutaneous plane, fat pad, and muscle.
        Dermatologic Surg. 2016; 42: 535-542https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000615
        • Nguyen A.
        • Pasyk K.A.
        • Bouvier T.N.
        • Hassett C.A.
        • Argenta L.C.
        Comparative study of survival of autologous adipose tissue taken and transplanted by different techniques.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990; 85: 378-379
        • Guerrero Santos J.
        • Gonzalez-Mendoza A.
        • Masmela Y.
        • Gonzalez M.A.
        • Deos M.
        • Diaz P.
        Long-term survival of free fat grafts in muscle: An experimental study in rats.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1996; 20: 403-408https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390315
        • Tanabe Y.
        • Koga M.
        • Saito M.
        • Matsunaga Y.
        • Nakayama K.
        Inhibition of adipocyte differentiation by mechanical stretching through ERK-mediated downregulation of PPARgamma2.
        J Cell Sci. 2004; 117: 3605-3614https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01207
        • Vissers D.
        • Verrijken A.
        • Mertens I.
        • et al.
        Effect of long-term whole body vibration training on visceral adipose tissue: A preliminary report.
        Obes Facts. 2010; 3: 93-100https://doi.org/10.1159/000301785
        • Baek R.M.
        • Park S.O.
        • Jeong E.C.
        • et al.
        The effect of botulinum toxin A on fat graft survival.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012; 36: 680-686https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9864-z
        • Kazzazi F.
        • Ching R.C.
        • Malata C.M.
        Postmastectomy breast reconstruction with the totally autologous latissimus dorsi flap in the thin, small-breasted woman: Give it more thought!.
        Eplasty. 2018; 18: e13
        • Nam S.B.
        • Oh H.C.
        • Choi J.Y.
        • et al.
        Volumetric change of the latissimus dorsi muscle after immediate breast reconstruction with an extended latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap.
        Arch Plast Surg. 2019; 46: 135-139https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.01690
        • Momoh A.O.
        • Colakoglu S.
        • Westvik T.S.
        • et al.
        Analysis of complications and patient satisfaction in pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2012; 69: 19-23https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e318221b578
        • Thorarinsson A.
        • Fröjd V.
        • Kölby L.
        • et al.
        A retrospective review of the incidence of various complications in different delayed breast reconstruction methods.
        J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016; 50: 25-34https://doi.org/10.3109/2000656X.2015.1066683
        • Fan K.L.
        • Luvisa K.
        • Black C.K.
        • et al.
        Gabapentin decreases narcotic usage: Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in free autologous breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg – Glob Open. 2019; 7https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002350