Advertisement

Utilisation of a 3D printed ex vivo flexor tendon model to improve surgical training.

Published:November 20, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.027

      Abstract

      Background

      Surgery for hand trauma accounts for a significant proportion of the plastic surgery trainee activity. The aim of this article is to create a standardised simulation training module for flexor tendon repair techniques for residents prior to their first encounter in the clinical setting.

      Methods

      A step-ladder approach flexor tendon repair training with four levels of difficulty was conducted using a 3D printed anatomical simulation model and a silicone tendon rod on a cohort of 28 plastic surgery Senior House Officers (SHOs) of various stages in their training (n=28). Assessment of knowledge (online questionnaire) and practical skills using validated score systems (global rating scale and task specific score) was performed at the beginning and end of the module by hand experts of our unit.

      Results

      The overall average knowledge-based score of the cohort pre- and post-assessment were 1.48/5 (29.6%) and 3.56/5 (71.5%) respectively. The overall average skills-based score of the cohort pre- and post-assessment were 3.05/5 (61%) and 4.12/5 (82.5%) respectively Significant (p<0.01) difference of improvement of knowledge and skills was noted on all trainees. All trainees confirmed that the training module improved their confidence with flexor tendon repair.

      Conclusion

      We demonstrate a standardized simulation training framework that employs a 3D printed flexor tendon simulation model proven to improve the skills of residents especially during their early learning curve and which paves the way to a more universal, standardized and validated training across hand-surgery.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Dean B
        • Pereira E.
        Surgeons and training time.
        BMJ. 2011; 343: d6724
        • Maxwell AJ
        • Crocker M
        • Jones TL
        • Bhagawati D
        • Papadopoulos MC
        • Bell BA.
        Implementation of the European Working Time Directive in neurosurgery reduces continuity of care and training opportunities.
        Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010; 152: 1207-1210
        • McCarthy M.
        Reduced surgical training hours harm patients and education, Canada study finds.
        BMJ. 2014; 348: g2627
        • Morris-Stiff GJ
        • Sarasin S
        • Edwards P
        • Lewis WG
        • Lewis MH.
        The European Working Time Directive: one for all and all for one?.
        Surgery. 2005; 137: 293-297
        • West D
        • Codispoti M
        • Graham T
        Specialty Advisory Board in Cardiothoracic Surgery of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. The European Working Time Directive and training in cardiothoracic surgery in the United Kingdom.
        Surgeon. 2007; 5: 81-85
        • Herrmann-Werner A
        • Nikendei C
        • Keifenheim K
        • Bosse HM
        • Lund F
        • Wagner R
        • Celebi N
        • Zipfel S
        • Weyrich P.
        Best Practice” Skills Lab Training vs. a “see one, do one” Approach in Undergraduate Medical Education: An RCT on Students’ Long-Term Ability to Perform Procedural Clinical Skills.
        PLOS ONE. 2013; 8: e76354
        • Gurusamy KS
        • Aggarwal R
        • Palanivelu L
        • Davidson BR.
        Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 1
        • Sturm LP
        • Windsor JA
        • Cosman PH
        • Cregan P
        • Hewett PJ
        • Maddern GJ.
        A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training.
        Ann Surg. 2008; 248: 166-179
        • Rimmer A.
        Simulation training to become part of surgical curriculum.
        BMJ. 2013; 347: f6707
        • Boursicot K
        • Etheridge L
        • Setna Z
        • Sturrock A
        • Ker J
        • Smee S
        • et al.
        Performance in assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa conference.
        Med Teach. 2011; 33: 370-383
        • Thomopoulos S
        • Parks WC
        • Rifkin DB
        • Derwin KA.
        Mechanisms of tendon injury and repair.
        J Orthop Res. 2015; 33: 832-839
        • Vinnicombe Z
        • Asher C.M
        • Super J
        • Bystrzonowski N
        • Katsarma E.
        A qualitative study of seven simulation models for tendon repairs.
        Journal of hand surgery. 2021; (February 20available online)
        • Guerreschi P
        • Qassemyar A
        • Thevenet J
        • et al.
        Reducing the number of animals used for microsurgery training programs by using a task-trainer simulator.
        Lab Anim. 2014; 48: 72-77
        • Venkatramani H
        • Varadharajan V
        • Bhardwaj P
        • Vallurupalli A
        • Sabapathy SR.
        Flexor tendon injuries.
        J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019; 10: 853-861
        • Agrawal N
        • Turner A
        • Grome L
        • et al.
        Use of Simulation in Plastic Surgery Training.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020; 8: e2896
        • Ingraham J.M.
        • Weber R.A.
        • Weber R.A
        Utilizing a Simulated Tendon to Teach Tendon Repair Technique.
        Hand. 2009; 4: 150-155
        • Papavasiliou T
        • Chatzimichail S
        • Chan J.C.Y
        • Bain C.J
        • Uppal L
        A Standardized Hand Fracture Fixation Training Framework using Novel 3D Printed Ex Vivo Hand Models.
        Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open. 2021; 9: e3406
        • Rawson S
        • Cartmell S
        • Wong J.
        Suture techniques for tendon repair; a comparative review.
        Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013; 3: 220-228
        • Low cost income countries- Chihena HB
        • Pafitanis G
        • Mitsunaga N
        • et al.
        Challenges in global reconstructive microsurgery: the sub-Saharan African Surgeon's perspective.
        JPRAS Open. 2019; 20: 19-26