Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 72, ISSUE 4, e9-e14, April 2019

Supraclavicular flap as a salvage procedure in reconstruction of head and neck complex defects

  • Helio R.N. Alves
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Present address: Al. Jau, 361 AP.32. Jardim Paulista, 01420-000 Sao Paulo, Brazil.
    Affiliations
    Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Division of Plastic Surgery, Sao Paulo University Medical School, Av Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, 8th floor, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jose Carlos Marques de Faria
    Affiliations
    Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Division of Plastic Surgery, Sao Paulo University Medical School, Av Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, 8th floor, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Search for articles by this author
  • Rafael Varella dos Santos
    Affiliations
    Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Division of Plastic Surgery, Sao Paulo University Medical School, Av Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, 8th floor, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Search for articles by this author
  • Claudio Cernea
    Affiliations
    Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Division of Plastic Surgery, Sao Paulo University Medical School, Av Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, 8th floor, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Search for articles by this author
  • Fabio Busnardo
    Affiliations
    Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Division of Plastic Surgery, Sao Paulo University Medical School, Av Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, 8th floor, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Search for articles by this author
  • Rolf Gemperli
    Affiliations
    Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Division of Plastic Surgery, Sao Paulo University Medical School, Av Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, 8th floor, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 07, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.12.050

      Summary

      The supraclavicular island flap (SCIF) is an interesting therapeutic option in head and neck reconstruction. Since popularized by Pallua in the late 90s, several clinical series have been published showing its versatility and usefulness. However, only a few studies have focused on factors associated with complications from SCIF use. In this study, we analyzed the factors contributing to SCIF unreliability. We performed a retrospective review of the data of 87 patients undergoing SCIF reconstruction between 2008 and 2015. No significant differences in mean complication rates were observed when the SCIF was used for primary or salvage reconstruction (28% versus 25%, respectively, p = 0.816) or for cutaneous or intraoral reconstruction (27% versus 28%, respectively, p = 0.932). Flap folding, preoperative radiotherapy, and microsurgery were associated with significantly increased complication rates (p = 0.002, p = 0.043, and p = 0.001, respectively), whereas smoking (p = 0.431) had no impact with regard to this. In conclusion, the SCIF is a versatile flap and an important therapeutic tool for use in salvage surgeries, particularly in those performed in patients with poor clinical conditions and limited flap options.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chen H.C.
        • Demirkan F.
        • Wei F.C.
        • Cheng S.L.
        • Cheng M.H.
        • Chen I.H.
        Free fibula osteoseptocutaneous-pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap combination in reconstruction of extensive composite mandibular defects.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 103: 839-845
        • Koshima I.
        • Yamamoto H.
        • Hosodo M.
        • Moriquchi T.
        • Orita Y.
        • Nagayama H.
        Free combined composite flaps using the lateral circumflex femoral system for repair of massive defects of the head and neck regions: an introduction to the chimeric flap principle.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92: 411
        • Blackwell K.E.
        • Buchbinder D.
        • Biller H.F.
        • Urken M.L
        Reconstruction of massive defects in the head and neck: the role of simultaneous distant and regional flaps.
        Head Neck. 1997; 19: 620
        • Wei F.C.1
        • Demirkan F.
        • Chen H.C.
        • et al.
        The outcome of failed free flaps in head and neck and extremity reconstruction what is next in the reconstructive ladder.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Oct; 108 (discussion 1161-2): 1154-1160
        • Okazaki M.1
        • Asato H.
        • Takushima A.
        • Sarukawa S.
        • Nakatsuka T.
        • Yamada A.
        • Harii K.
        Analysis of salvage treatments following the failure of free flap transfer caused by vascular thrombosis in reconstruction for head and neck cancer.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119: 1223
        • Ariyan S.
        The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap: a versatile flap for reconstruction in the head and neck.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979; 63: 73
        • Koh K.S.1
        • Eom J.S.
        • Kirk I.
        • Kim S.Y.
        • Nam S.
        Pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap in oropharyngeal reconstruction revisited.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Oct; 118 (discussion 1150): 1145-1149
        • Pallua N.
        • Magnus N.E.
        The tunneled supraclavicular island flap: an optimized technique for head and neck reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 842-851
        • Chiu E.S.
        • Liu P.H.
        • Friedlander P.L.
        Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: indications, complications, and outcomes.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 115-123
        • Henderson M.M.
        • Chiu E.S.
        • Jaffer A.S.
        A simple approach of tubularizing the supraclavicular flap for circumferential pharyngoesophageal defects.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126 (28e–29e)
        • Levy J.M.
        • Eko F.N.
        • Hilaire H.S.
        • Friedlander P.L.
        • Melgar M.A.
        • Chiu E.S.
        Posterolateral skull base reconstruction using the supraclavicular artery island flap.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2011; 22: 1751-1754
        • Epps M.T.
        • Cannon C.L.
        • Wright M.J.
        • et al.
        Aesthetic restoration of parotidectomy contour deformity using the supraclavicular artery island flap.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 1925-1931
        • Alves H.R.
        • Ishida L.C.
        • Ishida L.H.
        • et al.
        A clinical experience of the supraclavicular flap used to reconstruct head and neck defects in late-stage cancer patients.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Oct; 65: 1350-1356
        • Baek S.M.
        • Biller H.F.
        • Krespi Y.P.
        • Lawson W.
        The lower trapezius island myocutaneous flap.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1980; 5: 108-114
        • Chandrasekhar B.
        • Terz J.J.
        • Kokal W.A.
        • Beatty J.D.
        • Gottlieb M.E.
        The inferior trapezius musculocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1988; 21: 201-209
        • Cummings C.W.
        • Eisele D.W.
        • Coltrera M.D.
        Lower trapezius myocutaneous island flap.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989; 115: 1181-1185
        • McLean J.N.1
        • Carlson G.W.
        • Losken A.
        The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap revisited: a reliable technique for head and neck reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2010; 64: 570-573
        • Neligan P.C.
        • Gullane P.J.
        • Vesely M.
        • Murray D.
        The internal mammary artery perforator flap: New variation on an old theme.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119: 891-893
        • Iyer N.G.
        • Clark J.R.
        • Ashford B.G.
        Internal mammary artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction.
        ANZ J Surg. 2009; 79: 799-803
        • Yu B.T.
        • Hsieh C.H.
        • Feng G.M.
        • Jeng S.F.
        Clinical application of the internal mammaryartery perforator flap in head and neck reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Apr; 131 (520e–526e)
        • Nakatsuka T.
        • Harii K.
        • Asato H.
        • et al.
        Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 2003; 19: 363
        • Baek C.H.
        • Park W.
        • Choi N.
        • Gu S.
        • Sohn I.
        • Chung M.K
        Free flap outcome of salvage surgery compared to primary surgery for head and neck defects: a propensity score analysis.
        Oral Oncol. 2016; 62: 85-89
        • Sandu K.
        • Monnier P.
        • Pasche P.
        Supraclavicular flap in head and neck reconstruction: experience in 50 consecutive patients.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012; 269: 1261-1267
        • Ramirez C.A.
        • Fernandes R.P
        The supraclavicular artery island and trapezius myocutaneous flaps in head and neck reconstruction.
        Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2014; 26: 411-420
        • Razdan S.N.
        • Albornoz C.R.1
        • Ro T.1
        • et al.
        Safety of the supraclavicular artery island flap in the setting of neck dissection and radiation therapy.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015 Jun; 31: 378-383
        • Su T.
        • Pirgousis P.
        • Fernandes R.P.
        Versatility of supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction of vessel-depleted and difficult necks.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 71: 622-627