Advertisement
Review| Volume 72, ISSUE 3, P410-418, March 2019

Download started.

Ok

“Reduction mammaplasty with superomedial pedicle technique: A literature review and retrospective analysis of 938 consecutive breast reductions”

  • Author Footnotes
    1 Active role in literature review, data collection and analysis, statistics analysis, manuscript writing, creation of figures and tables, and revisions.
    Adam J. Bauermeister
    Correspondence
    Correspondence to: Adam J. Bauermeister, Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL 33331, USA
    Footnotes
    1 Active role in literature review, data collection and analysis, statistics analysis, manuscript writing, creation of figures and tables, and revisions.
    Affiliations
    Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    2 Participated in project development and data collection.
    Kiranjeet Gill
    Footnotes
    2 Participated in project development and data collection.
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    3 Participated in manuscript surgical techniques and discussion sections writing and revisions.
    Alexander Zuriarrain
    Footnotes
    3 Participated in manuscript surgical techniques and discussion sections writing and revisions.
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    4 One of the main surgeons in the study. Participated overseeing project, review, and suggested revisions.
    Steven A. Earle
    Footnotes
    4 One of the main surgeons in the study. Participated overseeing project, review, and suggested revisions.
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    4 One of the main surgeons in the study. Participated overseeing project, review, and suggested revisions.
    Martin I. Newman
    Footnotes
    4 One of the main surgeons in the study. Participated overseeing project, review, and suggested revisions.
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Active role in literature review, data collection and analysis, statistics analysis, manuscript writing, creation of figures and tables, and revisions.
    2 Participated in project development and data collection.
    3 Participated in manuscript surgical techniques and discussion sections writing and revisions.
    4 One of the main surgeons in the study. Participated overseeing project, review, and suggested revisions.
Published:December 13, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.12.004

      Summary

      Background

      The superomedial pedicle reduction mammaplasty has been noted in the literature to provide superior aesthetic results and longevity as well as shorter operative times. However, the inferior pedicle continues to be the most commonly utilized technique in the United States. There is a lack of large-volume outcome studies examining how the superomedial pedicle technique compares against more established reduction methods.

      Methods

      A retrospective review of 938 reduction mammaplasties was performed at a single institution over a 10-year period. A literature review of superomedial and inferior pedicle complication rates were performed. Study variables were compared against overall mean complication rates for the two techniques. Logistic regression, paired student T-Tests, and Chi-square analyses were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios and to compare continuous and categorical variables.

      Results

      Mean reduction weight was 730 g per breast, ranging from 100 to 4700 g. Overall complication rate was 16%, of which 10% were minor complications related to delayed wound healing. No cases of skin flap necrosis occurred. Increased complications were highly correlated with a BMI > 30, breast reduction weights > 831 g, and sternal notch to nipple distances > 35.5 cm.

      Conclusions

      The superomedial pedicle reduction mammaplasty technique is safe and reliable with a complication rate lower than the inferior pedicle technique. Based on our findings we propose that residents should be exposed to this method of reduction mammaplasty as part of a compilation of techniques learned in residency and that practicing surgeons would benefit from becoming familiar with its applications.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Boschert MT
        • Barone CM
        • Puckett CL
        Outcome Analysis of reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 98: 451-454
        • Gonzalez F
        • Walton RL
        • Shafer B
        • Matory EW
        • Borah GL
        Reduction mammaplasty improves symptoms of macromastia.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 91: 1270-1276
        • Setälä L
        • Papp A
        • Joukainen S
        • et al.
        Obesity and complications in breast reduction surgery: are restrictions justified?.
        J Plastic Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62: 195-199
        • Rogliani M
        • Gentile P
        • Labardi L
        • Donfrancesco A
        • Cervelli V
        Improvement of physical and psychological symptoms after breast reduction.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62: 1647-1649
        • Collins DE
        • Kerrigan CL
        • Kim M
        • et al.
        The effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical interventions in relieving the symptoms of macromastia.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109: 1556-1566
        • Scholz T
        • Diedrichson J
        • Olbrisch R
        • Liebau J
        Cost analysis of conservative versus operative therapy of macromastia (in German).
        Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, & Plastische Chirurgie. 2008; 40: 100-104
        • Saariniemi KMM
        • Keranen UH
        • Salminen-Peltola PK
        • Kuokkanen HOM
        Reduction mammaplasty is effective treatment according to two quality of life instruments. A prospective randomized clinical trial.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008; 61: 1472-1478
        • Freire M
        • Neto MS
        • Garcia EB
        • Quaresma MR
        • Ferreira LM
        Functional capacity and postural pain outcomes after reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119: 1149-1156
        • O'Blenes CAE
        • Delbridge CL
        • Miller BJ
        • Pantelis A
        • Morris SF
        Prospective study of outcomes after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117: 351-358
        • Miller BJ
        • Morris SF
        • Sigurdson LL
        • et al.
        Prospective study of outcomes after reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 1025-1031
        • Cherchel A
        • Azzam C
        • De Mey A
        Breastfeeding after vertical reduction mammaplasty using a superior pedicle.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007; 60: 465-470
        • Blomqvist L
        • Eriksson A
        • Brandberg Y
        Reduction mammaplasty provides long-term improvement in health status and quality of life.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 991-997
        • Brown A
        • Hill C
        • Khan K
        Outcome of reduction mammaplasty - a patients’ perspective.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2000; 53: 584-587
        • Chao JD
        • Memmel HC
        • Redding JF
        • Egan L
        • Odom LC
        • Casas LA
        Reduction mammaplasty is a functional operation, improving quality of life in symptomatic women: a prospective, single-center breast reduction outcome study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 110: 1644-1652
        • Eggert E
        • Schuss R
        • Å Edsander-Nord
        Clinical outcome, quality of life, patients’ satisfaction, and aesthetic results, after reduction mammaplasty.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009; 43: 201-206
        • Dabbah A
        • Lehman JA
        • Parker MG
        • Tantri D
        • Wagner DS
        Reduction mammaplasty.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1995; 35: 337-341
        • Mello AA
        • Domingos NAM
        • Miyazaki CM
        Improvement in quality of life and self-esteem after breast reduction surgery.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010; 34: 59-64
        • Romeo M
        • Cuccia G
        • Zirilli A
        • Weiler-Mithoff E
        • d’ Alcontres SF
        Reduction mammaplasty and related impact on psychosexual function.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63: 2112-2116
        • Saariniemi KM
        • Joukamaa M
        • Raitasalo R
        • Kuokkanen HO
        Breast reduction alleviates depression and anxiety and restores self-esteem: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009; 43: 320-324
        • Iwuagwu O
        • Stanley P
        • Platt A
        • Drew P
        • Walker L
        Effects of bilateral breast reduction on anxiety and depression: results of a prospective randomized trial.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006; 40: 19-23
        • Singh KA
        • Losken A.
        Additional benefits of reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 562-570
      1. Plastic Surgery Statistics Report 2017. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2017/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2017.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2018.

        • Kerrigan CL
        • Slezak SS
        Evidence-based medicine: reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132: 1670-1683
        • Arie G
        A new mastoplasty technique.
        Cirugía Plástica Ibero Latino Americana. 1957; 3
        • Georgiade NG
        • Serafin D
        • Riefkohl R
        • Georgiade GS
        Is there a reduction mammaplasty for ‘all seasons?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979; 63: 765-773
        • Bostwick J.
        Breast reduction, in plastic and reconstructive breast surgery.
        Quality Medical Publishing, Inc, St. Louis, MO1990
        • Orlando JC
        • Guthrie RH
        The superomedial dermal pedicle for nipple transposition.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1975; 28: 42-45
        • Hall-Findlay EJ
        A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104: 748-759
        • Finger RE
        • Vasquez B
        • Drew SG
        • Given KS
        • Hauben DJ
        Superomedial pedicle technique of reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 83: 479-480
        • Antony AK
        • Yegiyants SS
        • Danielson KK
        • et al.
        A matched cohort study of superomedial pedicle vertical scar breast reduction (100 breasts) and traditional inferior pedicle wise-pattern reduction (100 breasts).
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132: 1068-1076
        • Hauben DJ
        Experience and refinements with the supero-medial dermal pedicle for nipple-areola transposition in reduction mammoplasty.
        Aesthet Plast Surg. 1984; 8: 189-194
        • Hauben D
        Superomedial pedicle technique of reduction mammaplasty (Discussion).
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 83: 471-480
        • Makboul M
        • Abdelhamid M
        • Al-Attar G
        Long term follow up and patient satisfaction after reduction mammoplasty: superomedial versus inferior pedicle.
        World J Plast Surg. 2017; 6: 82-87
        • Kemaloğlu CA
        • Özocak H.
        Comparative outcomes of inferior pedicle and superomedial pedicle technique with wise pattern reduction in gigantomastic patients.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2018; 80: 217-222
        • Antony AK
        • Yegiyants S
        • Wisel S
        • et al.
        A matched cohort study of superomedial pedicle vertical scar breast reduction (100 breasts) and traditional wise-pattern breast reduction (100 breasts).
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130: 37
        • Amini P
        • Stasch T
        • Theodorou P
        • Altintas AA
        • Phan V
        • Spilker G
        Vertical reduction mammaplasty combined with a superomedial pedicle in gigantomastia.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2010; 64: 279-285
        • Spear SL
        • Davison SP
        • Ducic I
        Superomedial pedicle reduction with short scar.
        Semin Plast Surg. 2004; 18: 203-210
        • McCulley SJ
        • Schaverien MV
        Superior and superomedial pedicle wise-pattern reduction mammaplasty.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2009; 63: 128-134
        • Davison S
        • Mesbahi A
        • Ducic I
        • Sarcia M
        • Dayan J
        • Spear S
        The versatility of the superomedial pedicle with various skin reduction patterns.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120: 1466-1476
        • Landau AG
        • Hudson DA
        Choosing the superomedial pedicle for reduction mammaplasty in gigantomastia.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 735-739
        • Serra MP
        • Longhi P
        • Sinha M
        Breast reduction with a superomedial pedicle and a vertical scar (Hall-Findlayʼs technique).
        Ann Plast Surg. 2010; 64: 275-278
        • Lewin R
        • Göransson M
        • Elander A
        • Thorarinsson A
        • Lundberg J
        • Lidén M
        Risk factors for complications after breast reduction surgery.
        J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014; 48: 10-14
        • Neaman KC
        • Armstrong SD
        • Mendonca SJ
        • et al.
        Vertical reduction mammaplasty utilizing the superomedial pedicle: is it really for everyone?.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2012; 32: 718-725
        • Iorio ML
        • Endara M
        • Ducic I
        Reduction mammaplasty in patients with a medialized nipple-areola complex.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131: 302e-303e
        • Lugo LM
        • Prada M
        • Kohanzadeh S
        • Mesa JM
        • Long JN
        • de la Torre J
        Surgical outcomes of gigantomastia breast reduction superomedial pedicle technique.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2013; 70: 533-537
        • Brown RH
        • Siy R
        • Khan K
        • et al.
        The superomedial pedicle wise-pattern breast reduction: reproducible, reliable, and resilient.
        Semin Plast Surg. 2015; 29: 94-101
        • Hunter J
        • Ceydeli A.
        Correlation between complication rate and tissue resection volume in inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty: a retrospective study.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2006; 26: 153-156
        • Mandrekas AD
        • Zambacos GJ
        • Anastasopoulos A
        • Hapsas DA
        Reduction mammaplasty with the inferior pedicle technique: early and late complications in 371 patients.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1996; 49: 442-446
        • Lewin R
        • Göransson M
        • Elander A
        • Thorarinsson A
        • Lundberg J
        • Lidén M
        Risk factors for complications after breast reduction surgery.
        J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014; 48: 10-14
        • Hunter-Smith DJ
        • Smoll NR
        • Marne B
        • et al.
        Comparing breast-reduction techniques: time-to-event analysis and recommendations.
        Aesthet Plast Surg. 2012; 36: 600-606
        • Carty MJ
        • Chan R
        • Huckman R
        • Snow D
        • Orgill DP
        A detailed analysis of the reduction mammaplasty learning curve: a statistical process model for approaching surgical performance improvement.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 706-714
        • James A
        • Verheyden C.
        A retrospective study comparing patient outcomes of wise pattern-inferior pedicle and vertical pattern-medial pedicle reduction mammoplasty.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2011; 67: 481-483
        • Gulcelik MA
        • Dogan L
        • Camlibel M
        • et al.
        Early complications of a reduction mammoplasty technique in the treatment of macromastia with or without breast cancer.
        Clin Breast Cancer. 2011; 11: 395-399
        • Gerzenshtein J
        • Oswald T
        • McCluskey P
        • Caplan J
        • Angel MF
        Avoiding free nipple grafting with the inferior pedicle technique.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 55: 245-249
        • Scott GR
        • Carson CL
        • Borah GL
        Maximizing outcomes in breast reduction surgery: a review of 518 consecutive patients.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 116: 1633-1639
        • Wagner DS
        • Alfonso DR
        The influence of obesity and volume of resection on success in reduction mammaplasty: an outcomes study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 1034-1038
        • Ramon Y
        • Sharony Z
        • Moscona R
        • Peled I
        Evaluation and comparison of aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with bilateral breast reduction using the inferior pedicle and McKissock's vertical bipedicle dermal flap techniques.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 289-295
        • Wallace W
        • Thompson W
        • Smith R
        • Barraza K
        • Davidson S
        Reduction mammaplasty using the inferior pedicle technique.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1998; 40: 235-240
        • Davis G
        • Ringler S
        • Short K
        • Sherrick D
        • Bengtson B
        Reduction mammaplasty: long-term efficacy, morbidity, and patient satisfaction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995; 96: 1106-1110
        • Schnur P
        • Schnur D
        • Petty P
        • Hanson T
        • Weaver A
        Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100: 875-883
        • Bolger WE
        • Seyfer AE
        • Jackson SM
        Reduction Mammaplasty using the inferior glandular ‘pyramid’ pedicle.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987; 80: 75-84
        • O'Grady K
        • Thoma A
        • Dal Cin A
        A comparison of complication rates in large and small inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 736-742
        • DeFazio MV
        • Fan KL
        • Avashia YJ
        • et al.
        Inferior pedicle breast reduction: a retrospective review of technical modifications influencing patient safety, operative efficiency, and postoperative outcomes.
        Am J Surg. 2012; 204: e7-e14
        • Manahan MA
        • Buretta KJ
        • Chang D
        • et al.
        An outcomes analysis of 2142 breast reduction procedures.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2015; 74: 289-292
        • Henry SL
        • Crawford LJ
        • Puckett CL
        Risk factors and complications in reduction mammaplasty: novel associations and preoperative assessment.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1040-1046
        • Cunningham BL
        • Gear AJL
        • Kerrigan CL
        • Collins DE
        Analysis of breast reduction complications derived from the BRAVO study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 1597-1604
        • Fischer JP
        • Cleveland EC
        • Shang EK
        • Nelson JA
        • Serletti JM
        Complications following reduction mammaplasty: a review of 3538 cases from the 2005-2010 NSQIP data sets.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2013; 34: 66-73
        • Roehl K
        • Craig SE
        • Gómez V
        • Phillips LG
        Breast reduction: safe in the morbidly obese?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122: 370-378
        • Blomqvist L.
        Reduction mammaplasty: analysis of patients’ weight, resection weights, and late complications.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1996; 30: 207-210
        • Atterhem H
        • Holmner S.
        Reduction mammaplasty: symptoms, complications, and late results.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998; 32: 281-286
        • Zubowski R
        • Zins JE
        • Foray-Kaplon A
        • et al.
        Relationship of obesity and specimen weight to complications in reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 998-1003
        • Gamboa-Bobadilla MG
        • Killingsworth C
        Large-volume reduction mammaplasty: the effect of body mass index on postoperative complications.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 58: 246-249
        • Schumacher HHA
        Breast reduction and smoking.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 54: 117-119
        • Kreithen J
        • Caffee H
        • Rosenberg J
        • et al.
        A comparison of the LeJour and Wise pattern methods of breast reduction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 54: 236-241
        • Lista F
        • Ahmad J
        Vertical scar reduction mammaplasty: a 15-year experience including a review of 250 consecutive cases.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117: 2152-2165
        • Jackson IT
        • Bayramicli M
        • Gupta M
        • Yavuzer R
        Importance of the pedicle length measurement in reduction mammaplasty.
        Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104: 398-400
        • Erdogan B
        • Ayhan M
        • Deren O
        • Tuncel A
        Importance of pedicle length in inferior pedicle technique and long-term outcome of areola-to-fold distance.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002; 26: 436-443
        • Corrine W
        • Vucovich M
        • Rohrich R
        Mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty pedicles and skin resection patterns.
        Plastic Reconstr Surg Global Open. 2014; 2: e202
        • Bouwer LR
        • Biezen van der JJ
        • Spronk CA
        • van der Lei B.
        Vertical scar versus the inverted-T scar reduction mammaplasty: a 10-year follow-up.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012; 65: 1298-1304

      Linked Article