Autologous fat grafting: A comparative study of four current commercial protocols

  • Vincent Hivernaud
    Corresponding author. INSERM, LIOAD, UMR-S 791, Nantes, France.
    INSERM, LIOAD, UMR-S 791, Nantes, France

    Université de Nantes, UMR-S 791, LIOAD, UFR Odontologie, Nantes, France

    ONIRIS, UMR-S 791, LIOAD, Nantes, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Bruno Lefourn
    Clinique Bretéché, Département de Chirurgie Plastique et Reconstructive, Nantes, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Myriam Robard
    Cellular and Tissular Imaging Core Facility of Nantes University (MicroPICell), Structure Fédérative de Recherche François Bonamy, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jérôme Guicheux
    INSERM, LIOAD, UMR-S 791, Nantes, France

    Université de Nantes, UMR-S 791, LIOAD, UFR Odontologie, Nantes, France

    ONIRIS, UMR-S 791, LIOAD, Nantes, France

    CHU Nantes, PHU 4 OTONN, Nantes, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Pierre Weiss
    INSERM, LIOAD, UMR-S 791, Nantes, France

    Université de Nantes, UMR-S 791, LIOAD, UFR Odontologie, Nantes, France

    ONIRIS, UMR-S 791, LIOAD, Nantes, France

    CHU Nantes, PHU 4 OTONN, Nantes, France
    Search for articles by this author
Published:December 13, 2016DOI:



      Autologous fat grafting is a widely used technique that gives natural results when treating soft tissue deficiencies. However, there is no consensus on which is the best procedure to use, leading to unpredictable results because of fat graft resorption.


      This study compared four commercial lipotransfer devices by analyzing the behavior of the processed adipose tissue and outcome of the adipose graft in an in vivo model.


      Four different protocols that used manual, power-assisted or water-assisted lipoaspiration and then decantation, centrifugation, or filtration were used on each of eight patients to process lipoaspirate. Harvested adipose tissue was assessed in vitro for tissue resorption, oil formation, and cytokine secretion. Graft resorption rate was calculated and histological analyses were performed after subcutaneously injecting the harvested adipose tissue in a murine model.


      All protocols resulted in very low oil formation and histologically healthy grafts. The tissue volume was significantly greater after 2 days in culture when using manual lipoaspiration and soft centrifugations/washing steps (Microfill®/Macrofill®) compared to Water-Assisted Lipoaspiration/Decantation (BodyJet®) and Power-Assisted Lipoaspiration/Filtration (PAL® + PureGraft®). These results were confirmed in mice 1 month after subcutaneous injection, with greater efficiency obtained with protocols that used (A) manual aspiration, (B) soft centrifugations, and (C) washing steps.


      We confirmed that the choice of technique used to process adipose tissue during lipotransfer surgery can highly influence fat grafting efficacy. In our study, the use of manual aspiration combined with soft centrifugations led to the best results in the selected models.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Gutowski K.
        • Force A.F.G.T.
        Current applications and safety of autologous fat grafts: a report of the ASPS fat graft task force.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 272-280
        • Hivernaud V.
        • Lefourn B.
        • Guicheux J.
        • et al.
        Autologous fat grafting in the breast: critical points and technique improvements.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015; 39: 547-561
        • Leopardi D.
        • Thavaneswaran P.
        • Mutimer K.
        • Olbourne N.
        • Maddern G.
        Autologous fat transfer for breast augmentation: a systematic review.
        ANZ J Surg. 2014; 84: 225-230
        • Condé-Green A.
        • de Amorim N.
        • Pitanguy I.
        Influence of decantation, washing and centrifugation on adipocyte and mesenchymal stem cell content of aspirated adipose tissue: a comparative study.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg – JPRAS. 2010; 63: 1375-1381
        • Zhu M.
        • Cohen S.
        • Hicok K.
        • et al.
        Comparison of three different fat graft preparation methods: gravity separation, centrifugation, and simultaneous washing with filtration in a closed system.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131: 873-880
        • Kling R.
        • Mehrara B.
        • Pusic A.
        • et al.
        Trends in autologous fat grafting to the breast: a national survey of the american society of plastic surgeons.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132: 35-46
        • Hoareau L.
        • Bencharif K.
        • Girard A.
        • et al.
        Effect of centrifugation and washing on adipose graft viability: a new method to improve graft efficiency.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg – JPRAS. 2013; 66: 712-719
        • Kurita M.
        • Matsumoto D.
        • Shigeura T.
        • et al.
        Influences of centrifugation on cells and tissues in liposuction aspirates: optimized centrifugation for lipotransfer and cell isolation.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 1033
        • Fodor P.
        • Vogt P.
        Power-assisted lipoplasty (PAL): a clinical pilot study comparing PAL to traditional lipoplasty (TL).
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999; 23: 379-385
        • Hoppe D.
        • Ueberreiter K.
        • Surlemont Y.
        • Peltoniemi H.
        • Stabile M.
        • Kauhanen S.
        Breast reconstruction de novo by water-jet assisted autologous fat grafting–a retrospective study.
        GMS Ger Med Sci. 2013; 11
        • Girard A.
        • Mirbeau S.
        • Gence L.
        • et al.
        Effect of washes and centrifugation on the efficacy of lipofilling with or without local anesthetic.
        Surg–Global Open. 2015; 3: e496
        • Ansorge H.
        • Garza J.
        • McCormack M.
        • et al.
        Autologous fat processing via the revolve system: quality and quantity of fat retention evaluated in an animal model.
        Aesthetic Surg J. 2014; 34: 438-447
        • Ferraro G.
        • De Francesco F.
        • Tirino V.
        • et al.
        Effects of a new centrifugation method on adipose cell viability for autologous fat grafting.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011; 35: 341-348
        • Minn K.
        • Min K.
        • Chang H.
        • Kim S.
        • Heo E.
        Effects of fat preparation methods on the viabilities of autologous fat grafts.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010; 34: 626-631
        • Cheriyan T.
        • Kao H.
        • Qiao X.
        • Guo L.
        Low harvest pressure enhances autologous fat graft viability.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133: 13651368
        • Shiffman M.A.
        • Mirrafati S.
        Fat transfer techniques: the effect of harvest and transfer methods on adipocyte viability and review of the literature.
        Dermatol Surg Off Publ Am Soc Dermatol Surg. 2001; 27: 819-826
        • Wang W.
        • Fang X.
        • Williams S.
        • et al.
        Lidocaine-induced ASC apoptosis (tumescent vs. local anesthesia).
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014; 38: 1017-1023
        • Lee J.
        • Kirkham J.
        • McCormack M.
        • Nicholls A.
        • Randolph M.
        • Austen W.
        The effect of pressure and shear on autologous fat grafting.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131: 1125-1136
        • Li K.
        • Gao J.
        • Zhang Z.
        • et al.
        Selection of donor site for fat grafting and cell isolation.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013; 37: 153-158
        • Keck M.
        • Kober J.
        • Riedl O.
        • et al.
        Power assisted liposuction to obtain adipose-derived stem cells: impact on viability and differentiation to adipocytes in comparison to manual aspiration.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg – JPRAS. 2014; 67: 8
        • Fisher C.
        • Grahovac T.
        • Schafer M.
        • Shippert R.
        • Marra K.
        • Rubin J.
        Comparison of harvest and processing techniques for fat grafting and adipose stem cell isolation.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132: 351-361
        • Salinas H.
        • Broelsch G.
        • Fernandes J.
        • et al.
        Comparative analysis of processing methods in fat grafting.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 1
        • Khouri R.K.
        • Rigotti G.
        • Cardoso E.
        • Khouri R.K.
        • Biggs T.M.
        Megavolume autologous fat transfer: Part I. Theory and principles.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133: 550
        • Peltoniemi H.
        • Salmi A.
        • Miettinen S.
        • et al.
        Stem cell enrichment does not warrant a higher graft survival in lipofilling of the breast: a prospective comparative study.
        J Plast, Reconstr Aesthet Surg – JPRAS. 2013; 66: 1494-1503
        • Ueberreiter K.
        • von Finckenstein J.G.
        • Cromme F.
        • Herold C.
        • Tanzella U.
        • Vogt P.
        BEAULI™–a new and easy method for large-volume fat grafts.
        Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir: Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Handchirurgie: Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefässe: Organ der Vereinigung der Deutschen Plastischen Chirurgen. 2010; 42: 379-385
        • Yin S.
        • Luan J.
        • Fu S.
        • Zhuang Q.
        Is centrifugation necessary for processing lipoaspirate harvested via water-jet force assisted technique before grafting? Evidence of lipoaspirate concentration with enhanced fat graft survival.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2016; 77: 477-484
        • Dos-Anjos Vilaboa S.
        • Llull R.
        • Mendel T.
        Returning fat grafts to physiologic conditions using washing.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132: 323-326
        • Moore J.
        • Kolaczynski J.
        • Morales L.
        • et al.
        Viability of fat obtained by syringe suction lipectomy: effects of local anesthesia with lidocaine.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1995; 19: 335-339
        • Nelissen X.
        • Lhoest F.
        • Preud'Homme L.
        Refined method of lipofilling following DIEP breast reconstruction: 3D analysis of graft survival.
        Plast Reconstr Surg – Glob Open. 2015; 3