Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 66, ISSUE 10, P1360-1364, October 2013

The trap door flap: A reliable, reproducible method of anterior pinna reconstruction

  • N.M. McInerney
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Department of Plastic Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland. Tel.: +353 864011740.
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland

    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
    Search for articles by this author
  • R.P. Piggott
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland

    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
    Search for articles by this author
  • P.J. Regan
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland

    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
    Search for articles by this author

      Summary

      Introduction

      Resection of skin cancers of the conchal fossa and anti-helical rim presents a challenging reconstructive problem. A full thickness skin graft is often used following excision of the cartilage underlying the lesion. Colour mismatch, a contour defect and a donor site scar are potential drawbacks to this method of reconstruction. The postauricular trap door flap offers a superior option for these defects.

      Aims

      This study aims to assess the reliability and outcomes of the trap door flap for defects of the anterior surface of the pinna.

      Methods

      A retrospective review of all trap door flaps carried out in Galway University Hospital was carried out. Charts were reviewed in order to examine operative notes and assess for any complications and length of follow up.

      Results

      45 Patients were operated on by a single surgeon. The age range was 61–93 years. The majority of lesions excised were from the conchal area with 6 defects predominantly involving the scapha. No partial or complete flap loss occurred. 2 patients required further excision due to an incomplete margin and a local recurrence respectively. Follow up ranged from 3 months to 4 years with excellent cosmetic results were achieved in all cases with no scar issues at the flap or donor sites.

      Conclusion

      The trap door flap is an excellent method of conchal reconstruction. It is reliable and reproducible with no flap loss demonstrated in our series of 45 patients. Large defects can be reconstructed with this flap and the cosmetic result in terms of colour and contour, as well as a hidden donor site scar, make this a superior option to a full thickness skin graft.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Pless J.
        Carcinoma of the external ear.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976; 10 ([Epub 1976/01/01]): 147-151
        • Masson J.K.
        A simple island flap for reconstruction of concha-helix defects.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1972; 25 ([Epub 1972/10/01]): 399-403
        • Lynch J.
        • Mahajan A.L.
        • Regan P.
        The trap door flap for reconstructing defects of the concha.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2003; 56 ([Epub 2003/09/13]): 709-711
        • Dessy L.A.
        • Figus A.
        • Fioramonti P.
        • Mazzocchi M.
        • Scuderi N.
        Reconstruction of anterior auricular conchal defect after malignancy excision: revolving-door flap versus full-thickness skin graft.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63 ([Epub 2009/04/10]): 746-752
        • Larcher L.
        • Plotzeneder I.
        • Tasch C.
        • Riml S.
        • Kompatscher P.
        Retroauricular pull-through island flap for defect closure of auricular scapha defects – a safe one-stage technique.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011; 64 ([Epub 2010/12/15]): 934-936
        • Braga A.R.
        • Pereira L.C.
        • Grave M.
        • et al.
        Tunnelised inferiorly based preauricular flap repair of antitragus and concha after basal cell carcinoma excision: case report.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011; 64 ([Epub 2010/10/19]): e73-e75
        • Talmi Y.P.
        • Horowitz Z.
        • Bedrin L.
        • Kronenberg J.
        Auricular reconstruction with a postauricular myocutaneous island flap: flip-flop flap.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 98: 1191-1199
        • Yang D.
        • Morris S.F.
        Vascular basis of the retroauricular flap.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1998; 40 ([Epub 1998/02/17]): 28-33
        • Patterson A.R.
        • Brady G.
        • Walker P.D.
        • Telfer M.R.
        The perichondrial cutaneous graft and “flip-flop” flap in facial reconstruction: a series of 41 cases.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 46 ([Epub 2007/12/18]): 114-118
        • Ladocsi L.
        Perforator-preserving chondrocutaneous rotation flap reconstruction of auricular defects.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 112 ([Epub 2003/10/28]): 1566-1572

      Linked Article