Advertisement

Prospective outcome study of 106 cases of vertical mastopexy, augmentation/mastopexy, and breast reduction

Published:April 12, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2013.03.021

      Summary

      Background

      Patient-reported data, including effects on patient satisfaction and quality of life, have not been rigorously studied in women treated with mastopexy and augmentation/mastopexy. This prospective outcome study evaluates and compares mastopexy (n = 36), augmentation/mastopexy (n = 47), and reduction (n = 20) from the patient's perspective.

      Methods

      Over a 5-year period, 125 consecutive women underwent vertical mammaplasties incorporating a medial pedicle. In-person interviews were conducted among 106 women at least 1 month after surgery (response rate, 84.8%). Questions were asked in six categories: patient data, indications, recovery, results, complications, and psychological effects. A follow-up study examined the incidence of subjective nipple numbness.

      Results

      The mean pain rating was 4.5 on a 1–10 scale. Both mastopexy (resection weight <300 g per breast) and reduction patients reported a significant reduction in physical symptoms after surgery (p < 0.001). The mean result rating was 9.0 on a scale of 1–10. Expectations were met or exceeded in 91.5% of augmentation/mastopexy patients. The reported complication rate was 15.1%. The incidence of persistent nipple numbness was 10.6%. All procedures reduced breast self-consciousness (p < 0.001). A correlation was found between the result rating and a lack of complications (p = 0.01).

      Conclusions

      All three breast procedures provide a high level of patient satisfaction (94.3%), improved self-esteem (89.3%), and improved quality of life (69.5%). Mastopexy patients report a symptomatic benefit in addition to correction of ptosis. Vertical augmentation/mastopexy provides a high level of patient satisfaction.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Thoma A.
        • Sprague S.
        • Veltri K.
        • Duku E.
        • Furlong W.
        A prospective study of patients undergoing breast reduction surgery: health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120: 13-26
        • Faria F.S.
        • Guthrie E.
        • Bradbury E.
        • Brain A.N.
        Psychological outcome and patient satisfaction following breast reduction surgery.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1999; 52: 448-452
        • Saariniemi K.M.M.
        • Keranen U.H.
        • Salminen-Peltola P.K.
        • Kuokkanen H.O.M.
        Reduction mammaplasty is effective treatment according to two quality of life instruments. A prospective randomized clinical trial.
        J Plast Reconst Aesthet Surg. 2008; 61: 1472-1478
        • Gorney M.
        Ten years' experience in aesthetic surgery malpractice claims.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2001; 21: 569-571
        • Spear S.L.
        Augmentation/mastopexy: “Surgeon, beware”.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 112: 905-906
        • Handel N.
        Secondary mastopexy in the augmented patient: a recipe for disaster.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118: 152S-163S
        • Nahai F.
        Clinical decision-making in breast surgery.
        in: Nahai F. The art of aesthetic surgery. Principles & techniques. Quality Medical Publishing, St. Louis2005: 1818
        • Pusic A.L.
        • Klassen A.F.
        • Scott A.M.
        • Klok J.A.
        • Cordeiro P.G.
        • Cano S.J.
        Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the Breast-Q.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 345-353
        • Ching S.
        • Thoma A.
        • McCabe R.
        • Antony M.M.
        Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111: 469-477
        • Sackett D.L.
        • Straus S.E.
        • Richardson W.S.
        • Rosenberg W.
        • Haynes R.B.
        Therapy.
        in: Evidence-based medicine. 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone, Toronto2000: 105-154
      1. Swanson E. Prospective outcome study of 225 cases of breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg, in press.

        • Hall-Findlay E.J.
        A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104: 748-759
        • Sprole A.M.
        • Adepoju I.
        • Ascherman J.
        • Gayle L.B.
        • Grant R.T.
        • Talmor M.
        Horizontal or vertical? An evaluation of patient preferences for reduction mammaplasty scars.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2007; 27: 257-262
        • Sarwer D.B.
        • Gibbons L.M.
        • Magee L.
        • et al.
        A prospective, multisite investigation of patient satisfaction and psychosocial status following cosmetic surgery.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2005; 25: 263-269
        • Cano S.J.
        • Klassen A.F.
        • Scott A.M.
        • Cordeiro P.G.
        • Pusic A.L.
        The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129 ([discussion 303–304]): 293-302
        • Ferreira M.C.
        Evaluation of results in aesthetic plastic surgery: preliminary observations on mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 1630-1635
        • Sigurdson L.
        • Mykhalovskiy E.
        • Kirkland S.A.
        • Pallen A.
        Symptoms and related severity experienced by women with breast hypertrophy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119: 481-486
        • Cruz-Korchin N.
        • Korchin L.
        Vertical versus wise pattern breast reduction: patient satisfaction, revision rates, and complications.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 112: 1573-1578
        • Godwin Y.
        • Wood S.H.
        • O'Neill T.J.
        A comparison of the patient and surgeon opinion on the long-term aesthetic outcome of reduction mammaplasty.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1998; 51: 444-449
        • Harbo S.O.
        • Jorum E.
        • Roald H.E.
        Reduction mammaplasty: a prospective study of symptom relief and alterations of skin sensibility.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111: 103-110
        • Cerovac S.
        • Ali F.S.
        • Blizard R.
        • Lloyd G.
        • Butler P.E.M.
        Psychosexual function in women who have undergone reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 116: 1306-1313
        • Slezak S.
        • Dellon A.L.
        Quantitation of sensibility in gigantomastia and alteration following reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 91: 1265-1269
        • Gonzales F.
        • Brown F.E.
        • Gold M.E.
        • Walton R.L.
        • Shafer B.
        Preoperative and postoperative nipple-areola sensibility in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92: 809-814
        • Temple C.L.F.
        • Hurst L.N.
        Reduction mammaplasty improves breast sensibility.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104: 72-76
        • Courtiss E.H.
        • Goldwyn R.M.
        Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976; 58: 1-13
        • Hoffmann A.K.
        • Wuestner-Hofmann M.C.
        • Bassetto F.
        • Scarpa C.
        • Mazzoleni F.
        Breast reduction: modified “Lejour technique” in 500 large breasts.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120: 1095-1104
        • Schlenz I.
        • Rigel S.
        • Schemper M.
        • Kuzbari R.
        Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 743-751
        • Hall-Findlay E.J.
        Pedicles in vertical breast reduction and mastopexy.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2002; 29: 379-391
        • Greuse M.
        • Hamdi M.
        • DeMey A.
        Breast sensitivity after vertical mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 970-976
        • Ahmad J.
        • Lista F.
        Vertical reduction mammaplasty: the fate of nipple-areola complex position and inferior pole length.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 1084-1091
        • Swanson E.
        A retrospective photometric study of 82 published reports of mastopexy and breast reduction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128: 1282-1301
        • Spector J.A.
        • Karp N.S.
        Reduction mammaplasty: a significant improvement at any size.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120: 845-850
        • Spear S.L.
        • Pelletiere C.V.
        • Menon N.
        One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
        Aesthet Plast Surg. 2004; 28: 259-267
        • Hammond D.C.
        Augmentation mastopexy: general considerations.
        in: 2nd ed. Surgery of the breast. Principles and art. vol. 2. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2006: 1403
        • Kerrigan C.L.
        • Collins E.D.
        • Kneeland T.S.
        • et al.
        Measuring health state preferences in women with breast hypertrophy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 280-288
        • Pickford M.A.
        • Boorman J.G.
        Early experience with the Lejour vertical scar reduction mammaplasty technique.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1993; 46: 516-522
        • Berthe J.-V.
        • Massaut J.
        • Greuse M.
        • Coessens B.
        • DeMey A.
        The vertical mammaplasty: a reappraisal of the technique and its complications.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111: 2192-2202
        • Cunningham B.L.
        • Gear A.J.L.
        • Kerrigan C.L.
        • Collins E.D.
        Analysis of breast reduction complications derived from the BRAVO study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 1597-1604
      2. Swanson E. Prospective comparative clinical evaluation of 784 consecutive cases of breast augmentation and vertical mammaplasty, performed individually and in combination. Plast Reconstr Surg. Scheduled for publication July 2013.

        • Shermak M.A.
        • Chang D.
        • Buretta K.
        • Mithani S.
        • Mallalieu J.
        • Manahan M.
        Increasing age impairs outcomes in breast reduction surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128: 1182-1187