Research Article| Volume 66, ISSUE 3, P323-328, March 2013

Immediate breast reconstruction using porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™): Long-term outcomes and complications

Published:November 14, 2012DOI:



      There has been limited reported experience with the use of Strattice™ (LifeCell Corp., Branchburg, NJ), a porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix, in implant-based breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate our experience with this matrix.


      Patients who underwent immediate single-stage or two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with the assistance of Strattice were included in this study. Patient charts were reviewed for indications for mastectomy, adjunctive radiotherapy use, implant or expander volume, length of follow-up period, and type and incidence of complications during the follow-up period. Biopsies of Strattice were taken for histological analyses.


      A total of 105 reconstructions were performed in 54 patients: 77% were prophylactic and 23% were oncologic. All, but 4, reconstructions were single stage. Mean implant volume of single-stage reconstructions were 444.1 (range: 150–700 cc) and mean expander volume after completion of expansion was 400 (range: 350–450). Mean follow-up period was 41.3 months (range: 35.5–48.4 months). Total complication rate was 8.6%. Complications occurred in 9 breasts: implant loss or explantation (3.8%), infection (3.8%), skin breakdown or necrosis (2.9%), seroma (1.9%), implant exposure (1.0%), and delayed skin healing (1.0%). Histological analyses of implanted Strattice revealed a viable matrix with fibroblast infiltration and revascularization.


      Over a mean 3.5-year follow-up period, low complication rates and good outcomes were observed with the use of Strattice that are comparable to those reported with human acellular dermal matrices.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Gurunluoglu R.
        • Gurunluoglu A.
        • Williams S.A.
        • Tebockhorst S.
        Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2011 Aug 22; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Lanier S.T.
        • Wang E.D.
        • Chen J.J.
        • et al.
        The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2010; 64: 674-678
        • Salzberg C.A.
        Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm).
        Ann Plast Surg. 2006; 57: 1-5
        • Spear S.L.
        • Parikh P.M.
        • Reisin E.
        • Menon N.G.
        Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction.
        Aesthet Plast Surg. 2008; 32: 418-425
        • Sbitany H.
        • Sandeen S.N.
        • Amalfi A.N.
        • Davenport M.S.
        • Langstein H.N.
        Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1735-1740
        • Hanna K.R.
        • Degeorge Jr., B.R.
        • Mericli A.F.
        • Lin K.Y.
        • Drake D.B.
        Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2011 Aug 22; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Breuing K.H.
        • Warren S.M.
        Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 55: 232-239
        • Salzberg C.A.
        • Ashikari A.Y.
        • Koch R.M.
        • Chabner-Thompson E.
        An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm).
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 514-524
        • Breuing K.H.
        • Colwell A.S.
        Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 59: 250-255
        • Zienowicz R.J.
        • Karacaoglu E.
        Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120: 373-381
        • Bindingnavele V.
        • Gaon M.
        • Ota K.
        • Kulber D.A.
        • Lee D.J.
        Use of acellular cadaveric dermis and tissue expansion in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007; 60: 1214-1218
        • Namnoum J.D.
        Expander/implant reconstruction with AlloDerm: recent experience.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 387-394
        • Xu H.
        • Wan H.
        • Zuo W.
        • et al.
        A porcine-derived acellular dermal scaffold that supports soft tissue regeneration: removal of terminal galactose-α-(1,3)-galactose and retention of matrix structure.
        Tissue Eng Part A. 2009; 15: 1807-1819
        • Connor J.
        • McQuillan D.
        • Sandor M.
        • et al.
        Retention of structural and biochemical integrity in a biological mesh supports tissue remodeling in a primate abdominal wall model.
        Regen Med. 2009; 4: 185-195
        • Katerinaki E.
        • Zanetto U.
        • Sterne G.D.
        Histological appearance of Strattice tissue matrix used in breast reconstruction.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63: e840-e841
        • Israeli R.
        • Feingold R.S.
        Acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction in the setting of radiotherapy.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2011; 31: 51S-64S
        • Glasberg S.B.
        • Light D.
        AlloDerm and Strattice in breast reconstruction: a comparison and techniques for optimizing outcomes.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Feb 9; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Himsl I.
        • Drinovac V.
        • Lenhard M.
        • Stöckl D.
        • Weissenbacher T.
        • Dian D.
        The use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in silicone implant-based breast reconstruction.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Mar 2; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Maxwell G.P.
        • Gabriel A.
        Use of the acellular dermal matrix in revisionary aesthetic breast surgery.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2009; 29: 485-493
        • Spear S.L.
        • Seruya M.
        • Clemens M.W.
        • Teitelbaum S.
        • Nahabedian M.Y.
        Acellular dermal matrix for the treatment and prevention of implant-associated breast deformities.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 1047-1058
      1. Pozner JN, White J, Ramirez OM, Newman MI. The use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in revision cosmetic breast augmentation. Presented at the Aesthetic Meeting 2011; Boston, MA. Available at: [accessed 24.04.11].

        • Shestak K.C.
        Acellular dermal matrix inlays to correct significant implant malposition in patients with compromised local tissues.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2011 Sep; 31: 85S-94S
        • Cicilioni Jr., O.
        • Araujo G.
        • Mimbs N.
        • Cox M.D.
        Initial experience with the use of porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice) for abdominal wall reinforcement after transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2011 Aug 22; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Patel K.M.
        • Nahabedian M.Y.
        • Gatti M.
        • Bhanot P.
        Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2011 Dec 9; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Rosen M.J.
        • Denoto G.
        • Itani K.M.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of surgical outcomes of retro-rectus versus intraperitoneal reinforcement with bio-prosthetic mesh in the repair of contaminated ventral hernias.
        Hernia. 2012 Mar 14; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Newman M.I.
        • Swartz K.A.
        • Samson M.C.
        • Mahoney C.B.
        • Diab K.
        The true incidence of near-term postoperative complications in prosthetic breast reconstruction utilizing human acellular dermal matrices: a meta-analysis.
        Aesthet Plast Surg. 2010; 35: 100-106
        • Kim J.Y.
        • Davila A.A.
        • Persing S.
        • et al.
        A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 28-41
        • Vardanian A.J.
        • Clayton J.L.
        • Roostaeian J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128: 403e-410e
        • Cassileth L.
        • Kohanzadeh S.
        • Amersi F.
        One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implants: a new option for immediate reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2011 Jul 5; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Jansen L.A.
        • Macadam S.A.
        The use of AlloDerm in postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: part II. A cost analysis.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 2245-2254