Review| Volume 65, ISSUE 11, P1474-1480, November 2012

Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: A meta-analysis



      Countless studies have compared the use of autologous tissue for breast reconstruction; however, rates of donor-site morbidity differ greatly. This study examined the donor-site morbidity of superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA), deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps when used for unilateral breast reconstruction.


      Searches in PubMed and Medline as well as three manual search strategies for English-language articles published from 1 January 1995 to 1 January 2011 resulted in 2154 publications. Four levels of screening identified five studies suitable for the meta-analysis. StatsDirect software was used to perform the Mantel–Haenszel fixed-effect model.


      Only one study reported rates of donor-site morbidity for SIEA flaps. It was therefore impossible to perform any analysis regarding SIEA flaps. Five studies reported rates for both DIEP and MS-TRAM flaps and were used to estimate pooled relative risk (RR) and confidence intervals (CIs) of bulging. There was a 20% reduced risk of bulging when DIEP flaps were used compared to MS-TRAM flaps (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.48–1.35). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the risk of bulging in DIEP flap patients was one-third of MS-TRAM flap patients (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.06–1.36), when rates were reported by clinical examinations. However, when rates were reported by surveys there was no difference in bulge formation between DIEP and MS-TRAM flap patients (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.59–1.79). The adjusted RR of hernia in DIEP flap patients was approximately one-half of MS-TRAM flap patients (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.07–2.63).


      This analysis demonstrated a clear trend towards a favourable outcome when DIEP flaps were used compared to MS-TRAM flaps.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Holmström H.
        The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction. An experimental study and clinical case report.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979; 13: 423-427
        • Hartrampf C.R.
        • Schlefan M.
        • Black P.W.
        Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982; 69: 216-225
        • Koshima I.
        • Soeda S.
        Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1989; 42: 645-648
        • Allen R.J.
        • Treece P.
        Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1994; 32: 32-38
        • Blondeel P.N.
        • Boeckx W.D.
        Refinements in free flap breast reconstruction: the free bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap anastomosed to the internal mammary artery.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1994; 47: 495-501
        • Futter C.M.
        • Webster M.H.
        • Hagen S.
        • Mitchell S.L.
        A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2000; 53: 578-583
        • Nahabedian M.Y.
        • Tsangaris T.
        • Momen B.
        Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Feb; 115: 436-444
        • Wu L.C.
        • Bajaj A.
        • Chang D.W.
        • Chevray P.M.
        Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122: 702-709
        • Nelson J.A.
        • Guo Y.
        • Sonnad S.S.
        • et al.
        A comparison between DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps in breast reconstruction: a single surgeon's recent experience.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 1428-1435
        • Vyas R.M.
        • Dickinson B.P.
        • Fastekjian J.H.
        • Watson J.P.
        • Dalio A.L.
        • Crisera C.A.
        Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 1519-1526
        • Selber J.C.
        • Samra F.
        • Bristol M.
        • et al.
        A head-to-head comparison between the muscle-sparing free TRAM and the SIEA flaps: is the rate of flap loss worth the gain in abdominal wall function?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Aug; 122: 348-355
        • Bonde C.T.
        • Lund H.
        • Fridberg M.
        • Danneskiold-Samsoe B.
        • Elberg J.J.
        Abdominal strength after breast reconstruction using a free abdominal flap.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007; 60: 519-523
        • Schaverien M.V.
        • Perks A.G.
        • McCulley S.J.
        Comparison of outcomes and donor-site morbidity in unilateral free TRAM versus DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007; 60: 1219-1224
        • Bajaj A.K.
        • Chevray P.M.
        • Chang D.W.
        Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Mar; 117: 737-746
        • Stroup D.F.
        • Berlin J.A.
        • Morton S.C.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group.
        JAMA. 2000; 283: 2008-2012
        • Ascherman J.A.
        • Seruya M.
        • Bartsich S.A.
        Abdominal wall morbidity following unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flaps: an outcomes analysis of 117 consecutive patients.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Jan; 121: 1-8
        • Vega S.J.
        • Bossert R.P.
        • Serletti J.M.
        Improving outcomes in bilateral breast reconstruction using autogenous tissue.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2006 May; 56: 487-490
        • Chun Y.S.
        • Sinha I.
        • Turko A.
        • et al.
        Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Oct; 126: 1133-1141
        • Blondeel N.
        • Vanderstraeten G.G.
        • Monstrey S.
        • et al.
        The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1997; 50: 322-330
        • Rozen W.M.
        • Whitaker I.S.
        • Chubb D.
        • Ashton M.W.
        Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 2286-2288
        • Wolfram D.
        • Schoeller T.
        • Hussl H.
        • Wechselberger G.
        The superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap. Indications for breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2006; 57: 593-596
        • Lindsey J.T.
        Integrating the DIEP and muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM techniques optimizes surgical outcomes: presentation of an algorithm for microsurgical breast reconstruction based on perforator anatomy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119: 18-27
        • Nahabedian M.Y.
        • Dooley W.
        • Singh N.
        • Manson P.N.
        Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: the role of muscle preservation.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109: 91-101
        • Nahabedian M.Y.
        • Manson P.N.
        Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction: a multifactorial analysis.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jan; 109: 81-87
        • Rossetto L.A.
        • Abla L.E.
        • Vidal R.
        • et al.
        Factors associated with hernia and bulge formation at the donor site of the pedicled TRAM flap.
        Eur J Plast Surg. 2010 Aug; 33: 203-208
        • Banic A.
        • Boeckx W.
        • Greulich M.
        • et al.
        Late results of breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps: a prospective multicentric study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Jun; 95: 1195-1204
        • Chang D.W.
        • Wang B.
        • Robb G.L.
        • et al.
        Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 1640-1648
        • Lee B.T.
        • Chen C.
        • Nguyen M.D.
        • Lin S.J.
        • Tobias A.M.
        A new classification system for muscle and nerve preservation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
        Microsurgery. 2010; 30: 85-90
        • Garvey P.B.
        • Salavati S.
        • Feng L.
        • Butler C.E.
        Abdominal donor-site outcomes for medial versus lateral deep inferior epigastric artery branch perforator harvest.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jun; 127: 2198-2205