Advertisement
Correspondence and Communication| Volume 65, ISSUE 11, P1603-1605, November 2012

Pre-expanded bipedicled deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap for paediatric lower limb reconstruction

  • Damien Grinsell
    Affiliations
    Jack Brockhoff Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Research Unit, Room E533, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Melbourne, Grattan St, Parkville, 3050 Victoria, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Vladimir Saravolac
    Affiliations
    Jack Brockhoff Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Research Unit, Room E533, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Melbourne, Grattan St, Parkville, 3050 Victoria, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Warren M. Rozen
    Affiliations
    Jack Brockhoff Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Research Unit, Room E533, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Melbourne, Grattan St, Parkville, 3050 Victoria, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Iain S. Whitaker
    Affiliations
    Jack Brockhoff Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Research Unit, Room E533, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Melbourne, Grattan St, Parkville, 3050 Victoria, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
      We would like to present a challenging case, successfully managed with a unique combination of operative strategies, relying on basic principles. A 16-year old caucasian female with a large cutaneous neurofibroma on the right lower limb measuring 26 × 19 cm, presented for excision and reconstruction. A diagnosis of type 1 neurofibromatosis was made based on the presence of a large cutaneous neurofibroma, multiple typical neurofibromas, more than 6 large café-au-lait spots and iris hamartomas (Lisch nodules). She had no other previous medical history and no previous surgery. Due to the size of the defect and the need for a large pliable fasciocutaneous flap, a lower abdominal flap was planned, however the patient's low body mass index (BMI) and lack of abdominal tissue suggested that closure of the donor site would present a problem. Other reconstructive options entertained in this setting included an anterolateral thigh flap, although the donor site was considered sub-optimal, and other flaps such as the groin flap would not have spanned the defect. A pre-expanded, bipedicled free ‘stacked’ deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEP) flap was thus selected as the option of choice.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rozen W.M.
        • Ashton M.W.
        • Grinsell D.
        • et al.
        Establishing the case for CT angiography in the preoperative imaging of abdominal wall perforators.
        Microsurgery. 2008; 28: 306-313
        • Hallock G.G.
        A systematic approach for improvement of the donor sites of fasciocutaneous flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104: 993-998
        • Hallock G.G.
        The preexpanded anterolateral thigh free flap.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2004; 53: 170-173
        • Pandya A.N.
        • Vadodaria S.
        • Coleman D.J.
        Tissue expansion in the limbs: a comparative analysis of limb and non-limb sites.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2002; 55: 302-306
        • Clifton M.S.
        • Heiss K.F.
        • Keating J.J.
        • Mackay G.
        • Ricketts R.R.
        Use of tissue expanders in the repair of complex abdominal wall defects.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2011; 46: 372-377
        • Wiese K.G.
        Osmotically induced tissue expansion with hydrogels: a new dimension in tissue expansion? A preliminary report.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1993; 21: 309-313
        • Böttcher-Haberzeth S.
        • Kapoor S.
        • Meuli M.
        • et al.
        Osmotic expanders in children: no filling–no control–no problem?.
        Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2011; 21: 163-167
        • Ronert M.A.
        • Hofheinz H.
        • Manassa E.
        • Asgarouladi H.
        • Olbrisch R.R.
        The beginning of a new era in tissue expansion: self-filling osmotic tissue expander–four-year clinical experience.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114: 1025-1031
        • Obdeijn M.C.
        • Nicolai J.-P.A.
        • Werker P.M.N.
        The osmotic tissue expander: a three-year clinical experience.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62: 1219-1222
        • Rivera R.
        • LoGiudice J.
        • Gosain A.K.
        Tissue expansion in pediatric patients.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2005; 32: 35-44