Research Article| Volume 65, ISSUE 11, P1496-1505, November 2012

Histopathological comparisons of irradiated and non-irradiated breast skin from the same individuals


      Because of increasing indications for post-mastectomy irradiation and a growing demand for breast reconstruction using expanders and implants, both these procedures are performed in increasing numbers of patients. Although it is known that irradiation increases the difficulty of subsequent breast reconstruction, there is still insufficient information regarding differences in radiation-induced histopathological changes between individuals. In this study, we had the opportunity to take skin biopsy specimens from both the irradiated and non-irradiated breasts of 20 patients, and examine the histopathological differences between them. Skin was taken from the irradiated breast of 20 patients at the time of breast reconstruction, and skin was taken from the contralateral non-irradiated breast at the time of contralateral reconstruction, reduction or implant insertion for augmentation. A horizontally oriented specimen of skin was taken from both sides. Specimens were horizontally sliced and histopathologically examined by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). We identified five characteristic histological changes in the irradiated breast skin: (1) hyperplasia of the epidermis; (2) flattening of the papillary layer; (3) atrophy of dermal appendages; (4) high density of dermal collagen fibres; and (5) unidirectional alignment of the dermal collagen fibres (UACF). UACF was further confirmed by SEM. UACF seemed to be strongly associated with complications. These histopathological findings correlated with the difficulty of expanding irradiated skin, resulting in poor aesthetic outcomes such as capsular contracture and expander/implant extrusion. Careful attention should be paid to the techniques of breast reconstruction after irradiation.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Spear S.L.
        • Spittler C.J.
        Breast reconstruction with implants and expanders.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107 (quiz 88): 177-187
        • O'Shaughnessy K.
        • Fine N.
        Issues related to choice of breast reconstruction in early-stage breast cancer.
        Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2006; 7: 129-139
        • Iwahira Y.
        • Yamakawa T.
        • Maruyama Y.
        • Saze M.
        Breast reconstruction using textured, integrated-valve tissue expanders.
        J Jpn P R S. 2004; 24 ([in Japanese]): 771-778
        • Breuing K.H.
        • Colwell A.S.
        Immediate breast tissue expander-implant reconstruction with Inferolateral AlloDerm Hammock and postoperative radiation: a Preliminary Report.
        Eplasty. 2009; 9: e16
        • Behranwala K.A.
        • Dua R.S.
        • Ross G.M.
        • et al.
        The influence of radiotherapy on capsule formation and aesthetic outcome after immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical expander implants.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006; 59: 1043-1051
        • Benediktsson K.
        • Perbeck L.
        Capsular contracture around saline-filled and textured subcutaneously placed implants in irradiated and non-irradiated breast cancer patients: five years of monitoring of a prospective trial.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006; 59: 27-34
        • Pinsolle V.
        • Grinfeder C.
        • Mathoulin-Pelissier S.
        • Faucher A.
        Complications analysis of 266 immediate breast reconstructions.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006; 59: 1017-1024
        • Kronowitz S.J.
        • Robb G.L.
        Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 395-408
        • Nava M.B.
        • Pennati A.E.
        • Lozza L.
        • et al.
        Outcome of different timings of radiotherapy in implant-based breast reconstructions.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128: 353-359
        • Evans G.R.
        • Schusterman M.A.
        • Kroll S.S.
        • et al.
        Reconstruction and the radiated breast: is there a role for implants?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995; 96 (discussion, 6-8): 1111-1115
        • Forman D.L.
        • Chiu J.
        • Restifo R.J.
        • et al.
        Breast reconstruction in previously irradiated patients using tissue expanders and implants: a potentially unfavorable result.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1998; 40 (discussion 3–4): 360-363
        • Hymes S.R.
        • Strom E.A.
        • Fife C.
        Radiation dermatitis: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and treatment 2006.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006; 54: 28-46
        • Archambeau J.O.
        • Pezner R.
        • Wasserman T.
        Pathophysiology of irradiated skin and breast.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995; 31: 1171-1185
        • Harper J.L.
        • Franklin L.E.
        • Jenrette J.M.
        • Aguero E.G.
        Skin toxicity during breast irradiation: pathophysiology and management.
        South Med J. 2004; 97: 989-993
        • Junkins-Hopkins J.M.
        Disorders associated with physical agents: heat, cold, radiation, and trauma.
        in: Elder D.E. Elenitsas R. Johnson B.L. Murphy G.E. Xu X. Lever's Histopathology of the skin. 10th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2009: 343-360
        • Lipa J.E.
        • Qiu W.
        • Huang N.
        • Alman B.A.
        • Pang C.Y.
        Pathogenesis of radiation-induced capsular contracture in tissue expander and implant breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125: 437-445
        • Hoeller U.
        • Borgmann K.
        • Bonacker M.
        • et al.
        Individual radiosensitivity measured with lymphocytes may be used to predict the risk of fibrosis after radiotherapy for breast cancer.
        Radiother Oncol. 2003; 69: 137-144
        • Svensson J.P.
        • Stalpers L.J.
        • Esveldt-van Lange R.E.
        • et al.
        Analysis of gene expression using gene sets discriminates cancer patients with and without late radiation toxicity.
        PLoS Med. 2006; 3: 1904-1914
        • Tucker S.L.
        • Turesson I.
        • Thames H.D.
        Evidence for individual differences in the radiosensitivity of human skin.
        Eur J Cancer. 1992; 28A: 1783-1791
        • Parsa A.A.
        • Jackowe D.J.
        • Johnson E.W.
        • et al.
        Selection criteria for expander/implant breast reconstruction following radiation therapy.
        Hawaii Med J. 2009; 68: 66-68
        • Iwahira Y.
        The analysis of expander/implant reconstruction for irradiated patients.
        J Jpn P R S. 2009; 29 ([in Japanese]): 337-346
        • Huang L.
        • Nakagami G.
        • Minematsu T.
        • et al.
        Ulceration and delayed healing following pressure loading in hyperglycemic rats with an immature dermal collagen fiber network.
        WOUNDS. 2010; 22: 237-244
        • Sarfati I.
        • Ihrai T.
        • Kaufman G.
        • Nos C.
        • Clough K.B.
        Adipose-tissue grafting to the post-mastectomy irradiated chest wall: preparing the ground for implant reconstruction.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011; 64: 1161-1166