Plastic surgeons and other doctors who perform cosmetic procedures face relatively high risks of malpractice claims and complaints. In particular, alleged problems with the consent process abound in this area, but little is known about the clinical circumstances of these cases.
We reviewed 481 malpractice claims and serious health care complaints resolved in Australia between 2002 and 2008 that alleged failures in the informed consent process for cosmetic and other procedures. We identified all “cases” involving cosmetic procedures and reviewed them in-depth. We calculated their frequency, and described the treatments, allegations, and outcomes involved.
A total of 16% (77/481) of the legal disputes over informed consent involved cosmetic procedures. In 70% (54/77) of these cases, patients alleged that the doctor failed to disclose risks of a particular complication, in 39% patients claimed that potential lack of benefit was not explained, and in 26% patients allegations centred on the process by which consent was sought. Five treatment types—liposuction, breast augmentation, face/neck lifts, eye/brow lifts, and rhinoplasty/septoplasty—featured in 70% (54/77) of the cases. Scarring (30/77) and the need for reoperation (18/77) were among the most prevalent adverse health outcomes at issue.
A mix of factors “supercharges” the informed consent process for cosmetic procedures. Doctors who deliver these procedures should take special care to canvas the risks and possible outcomes that matter most to patients.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Claim trend analysis.2009 ed. Physicians Insurers Association of America, Rockville, MD2009
- Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.N Engl J Med. 2011; 365: 629-636
- Review of independent sector cosmetic surgery claims.Medical Defence Union, London2006
- Consenting and consulting for cosmetic surgery.Br J Plas Surg. 1998; 51: 547-550
- Recognition and management of the patient unsuitable for aesthetic surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 2268-2271
- The hard sell in cosmetic surgery advertising.BMJ. 2010; 340: c1223
- Cosmetic surgery and the internal morality of medicine.Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2000; 9: 353-364
- Better than well.Norton and Company, New York2003
- The beauty myth: how images of beauty are used against women.HarperPerennial, New York1991
- On the face of it: a review of the organisational structures surrounding cosmetic surgery.(National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death)
- Medical litigation in cosmetic plastic surgery.Med Law. 2004; 23: 479-488
- Ethical issues in plastic and reconstructive surgery.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011; 35: 262-267
- When informed consent goes poorly: a descriptive study of negligence claims and patient complaints in Australia.Med J Aust. 2011; 195: 340-344
- A measure of malpractice: medical injury, malpractice litigation, and patient compensation.Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass1993
- Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation.New Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 2024-2033
Anderson DM. Dorland's medical dictionary. 31st ed. Saunders Elsevier: Philadelphia.
- Remedies sought and obtained in healthcare complaints.BMJ Qual Saf. 2011; 20: 806-810
- Cosmetic surgery national data bank statistics. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, California2010
- Empirical research on informed consent – an annotated bibliography.Hastings Cent Rep. 1999; 29: S1-S42
- A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions.World J Surg. 2010; 34: 1406-1415
- The practice of autonomy: patients, doctors, and medical decisions.Oxford University Press, New York1998 (p. 307)
- Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 3
- Negligent care and malpractice claiming behavior in Utah and Colorado.Med Care. 2000; 38: 250-260
- Factors affecting quality of informed consent.BMJ. 1993; 306: 885
- Relationship between complaints and quality of care in New Zealand: a descriptive analysis of complainants and non-complainants following adverse events.Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15: 17-22
- Patient ombudsmen in seven European countries: an effective way to implement patients' rights?.Eur J Health L. 2003; 10: 343-357
- The patients' complaints system in New Zealand.Health Aff. 2002; 21: 70-79
- Beneficence, non-maleficence, distributive justice and respect for patient autonomy – reconcilable ends in aesthetic surgery?.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011; 64: 11-16
Published online: June 04, 2012
Accepted: May 3, 2012
Received: February 14, 2012
© 2012 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.