Research Article| Volume 65, ISSUE 10, P1363-1367, October 2012

Anatomical evaluation of the internal mammary vessels based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)



      The rib-sparing technique to access the internal mammary vessels for microanastomosis is the current practice in our hospital nowadays. This study is performed to analyse the best intercostal space to expose those vessels.

      Patients and methods

      Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the chest wall of 133 women was evaluated. The Schwabegger classification (representing the anatomical variation), the intercostal space between ribs two, three and four, and the surface of the internal mammary artery and veins in the second and third intercostal space were determined on multiplanar reconstructed T2-weighted images.


      In more than half of the cases, the anatomy followed Schwabegger variation two; one lateral artery and one medial vein were symmetrical. If a second vein was present, the bifurcation was most commonly in the third intercostal space. The second intercostal space above the mammary vessels was significantly wider than the third one. The surface of the artery and vein(s) was significantly larger in the second intercostal space.


      In most clinical situations, the second intercostal space is most likely the best approach to the internal mammary vessels for microanastomosis using a rib-sparing technique because of wider intercostal space and larger artery and vein.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Shaw W.W.
        Breast reconstruction by superior gluteal microvascular free flaps without silicone implants.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983; 72: 490
        • Feller A.M.
        Free TRAM:results and abdominal wall function.
        Clin Plast Surg. 1994; 21: 223
        • Dupin C.L.
        • Allen R.
        • Glass C.A.
        • Bunch R.
        The internal mammary artery and vein as recipient site for free-flap breast reconstruction: a report of 110 consecutive cases.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 98: 685-689
      1. Clark CP, Pittman CE, Rohrich RJ. An anatomical study of the internal mammary artery and vein. In: Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, Marco island; 1995.

        • Parrett B.
        • Caterson S.A.
        • Tobias A.
        • Lee B.T.
        The rib-sparing technique for internal mammary vessel exposure in microsurgical breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2008; 60: 241-243
        • Sacks J.M.
        • Chang D.W.
        Rib-sparing internal mammary vessel harvest for microvascular breast reconstruction in 100 consecutive cases.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123: 14031407
        • Malata C.M.
        • Moses M.
        • Mickute Z.
        • Di Candia M.
        Tips for successful microvascular abdominal flap reconstruction utilizing the “total rib preservation” technique for internal mammary vessel exposure.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2011; 66: 36-42
        • Levine J.L.
        • Allen R.J.
        • Khoobehi K.
        Opened book technique for accessing the internal mammary vessels for microanastomosis.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 2006; : 22
        • Schoeller T.
        • Schubert H.M.
        • Wechselberger G.
        Rib cartilage replacement to prevent contour deformity after internal mammary vessel access.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008; 61: 464-466
        • Guzzetti T.
        • Thione A.
        A successful breast reconstruction with a perforator to deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2001; 46: 641-643
        • Munoz A.M.
        • Ishida L.H.
        • Montag E.
        • et al.
        Perforator flap breast reconstruction using internal mammary perforator branche as a recipient site: an anatomical and clinical analysis.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114: 62-68
        • Hartrampf C.R.
        • Scheflan M.
        • Black P.W.
        Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982; 69: 216-225
        • Hanasono M.M.
        • Kocak E.
        • Ogunleye O.
        • Hartley C.J.
        • Miller M.J.
        One versus two venous anastomoses in microvascular free flap surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov; 126: 1548-1557
        • Greer-Bayramoglu R.J.
        • Chu M.W.
        • Fortin A.J.
        Feasibility of internal mammary vessel use in breast reconstruction versus coronary artery bypass surgery: an anatomic, cadaveric evaluation.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 May; 127: 1783-1789