The latissimus dorsi muscle flap is a common method for the reconstruction of the breast following mastectomy. The study aimed to assess the quality of this reconstruction using a three-dimensional (3D) imaging method. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in volume between the reconstructed breast and the opposite side.
This study was conducted in forty-four patients who had had immediate unilateral breast reconstruction by latissimus dorsi muscle flap. The breast was captured using the 3D imaging system. Ten landmarks were digitised on the 3D images. The volume of each breast was measured by the application of Breast Analysis Tool software. The symmetry of the breast was measured using Procrustes analysis. The impact of breast position, orientation, size and intrinsic shape on the overall breast asymmetry was investigated.
The null hypothesis was rejected. The reconstructed breast showed a significantly smaller volume when compared to the opposite side, p < 0.0001, a mean difference of 176.8 cc and 95% CI (103.5, 250.0). The shape and the position of the reconstructed breast were the main contributing factors to the measured asymmetry score.
3D imaging was efficient in evaluating the outcome of breast surgery. The latissimus dorsi muscle flap on its own for breast reconstruction did not restore the volume and shape of the breast fully lost due to complete mastectomy. The modification of this method and the selection of other or additional surgical techniques for breast reconstruction should be considered. The asymmetry analysis through reflection and Procrustes matching was a useful method for the objective shape analysis of the female breast and presented a new approach for breast shape assessment. The intrinsic breast shape and the positioning of the breast were major components of postoperative breast asymmetry. The reconstructed breast was smaller overall than the un-operated breast at a significant level when assessing the breast volume using the surface area. 3D imaging by multiple stereophotogrammetry was a useful tool for volume measurements, shape analysis and the evaluation of symmetry.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Validation of a vision-based three dimensional facial imaging system.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003; 40: 523-529
- On the measurement and analysis of asymmetry with applications to facial modeling.J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat). 2006; 55: 77-91
- A method of assessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application.Br J Plast Surg. 1999; 52: 355-359
- Investigation into accuracy and reproducibility of a 3D breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras.JPRAS. 2011; 64: 577-582
- Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed breast using a 3-dimensional laser light scanner.Ann Plast Surg. 2006; 56: 237-242
- Validation and reproducibility of a high resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 46: 27-32
- New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging.Ann Plast Surg. 2006; 57: 602-610
- Validating three dimensional imaging of the breast.Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 54: 471-476
- Congenital breast asymmetry: subjective and objective assessment.Br J Plast Surg. 1994; 47: 95-102
- Three-dimensional digital evaluation of breast symmetry after breast conservation therapy.J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 227-232
Oehler SB. BAT. Breast analysis tool for volume and surface measurement of breast segment for clinical purposes. MSc thesis: University of Glasgow; September 11th, 2006.
Published online: April 23, 2012
Accepted: March 27, 2012
Received: November 29, 2011
© 2012 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.