Case report| Volume 65, ISSUE 10, P1425-1429, October 2012

Correction of breast contour deformities using polyurethane breast implant capsule in revisional breast surgery

Published:April 16, 2012DOI:


      Surgeons are commonly confronted with breast contour deformities and defects that result from previous surgical interventions. These soft tissue deformities can be corrected by conventional reconstructive flap surgery using autologous tissue, but there can be donor site morbidity. Smaller volume replacement is possible using temporary fillers such as hyaluronic acid or polylactic acid, or by using ‘permanent’ fillers such as autologous fat, but large defects are notoriously difficult to fill and often the fillers resorb or migrate.
      The patient described in this case report had an exchange of polyurethane implant (PU) in the left breast and correction of a contralateral breast contour filling deformity. A left breast partial capsulectomy was performed after implant removal and the capsule graft was inserted into a predissected pocket where soft tissue augmentation was required. A biopsy from the PU capsule was reported to show a foreign body type giant cell reaction to PU material in a fibrous capsule, lined by synovial metaplasia. The post-operative result showed satisfactory soft tissue revolumisation.
      PU breast implant structured capsule has thus been used as filler to correct breast soft tissue deformity and contour defects. Clearly it may have a use in other anatomical sites.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Surgeons British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons. Cosmetic Rates of Inflation: Male, Female Breast Ops on the Rise (London, U.K.) 2009 Report of 2008 Statistics. [accessed 06.03.12].

        • Bassetto F.
        • Scarpa C.
        • Caccialanza E.
        • Montesco M.C.
        • Magnani P.
        Histological features of periprosthetic mammary capsules: silicone vs. polyurethane.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010; 34: 481-485
        • Spear S.L.
        • Murphy D.K.
        • Slicton A.
        • Walker P.S.
        • Inamed Silicone Breast Implant U.S. Study Group
        Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120: 8-16
        • Codner M.A.
        • Mejia J.D.
        • Locke M.B.
        • et al.
        A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 1300-1310
        • Ashley F.
        A new type of breast prosthesis.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1970; 45: 421-424
        • Vazquez G.
        A ten-year experience using polyurethane-covered breast implants.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999; 23: 189-196
        • Frame J.D.
        • Frame J.E.
        Modifying integra as a regeneration template in deep tissue planes.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006; 59: 460-464
        • Hester Jr., T.R.
        • Ford N.F.
        • Gale P.J.
        • et al.
        Measurement of 2,4-toluenediamine in urine and serum samples from women with meme or replicon breast implants.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100: 1291-1298
        • Isenburg J.S.
        Further clinical experience in permanent lip augmentation using autologous breast implant capsule.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1998; 40/3: 265-267
        • Imran D.
        • Javaid M.
        • Lewis D.
        • Attar K.H.
        Capsular flap for correction of contour deformities of the breast.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 54: 662-663