Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 65, ISSUE 8, P1041-1050, August 2012

Tug ‘O’ war: Challenges of transverse upper gracilis (TUG) myocutaneous free flap breast reconstruction

  • Michelle B. Locke
    Affiliations
    University of Toronto, Department of Surgery and Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 8N-865, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada

    University of Auckland, Department of Surgery, Auckland, New Zealand
    Search for articles by this author
  • Toni Zhong
    Affiliations
    University of Toronto, Department of Surgery and Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 8N-865, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Marc A.M. Mureau
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • Stefan O.P. Hofer
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 416 340 3449; fax: +1 416 340 4403.
    Affiliations
    University of Toronto, Department of Surgery and Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 8N-865, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
Published:March 14, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.02.020

      Summary

      Autologous tissue microsurgical breast reconstruction is increasingly requested by women following mastectomy. While the abdomen is the most frequently used donor site, not all women have enough abdominal tissue excess for a unilateral or bilateral breast reconstruction. A secondary choice in such women may be the transverse upper gracilis (TUG) myocutaneous flap. This study reviews our experience with TUG flap breast reconstruction looking specifically at reconstructive success rate and the requirement for secondary surgery. A total of 16 free TUG flaps were performed to reconstruct 15 breasts in eight patients over a period of five years. Data were collected retrospectively by chart review. Follow up ranged from 14 to 41 months. During the follow up period, there was one (6.3%) complete flap loss in an immediate breast reconstruction patient. Four further flaps (25%) failed in their primary aim of breast reconstruction, as they required additional significant reconstruction with either deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps (two flaps (12.5%), one patient) or augmentation with silicone breast implants (two flaps (12.5%), one patient), giving a successful breast reconstruction rate with the TUG flap of only 66.7%. In all of the remaining reconstructed breasts, deficient flap volume or breast contour was seen. Eight flaps were augmented by lipofilling. A total of 62.5% of the donor sites had complications, namely sensory disturbance of the medial thigh (25%) and poor scar (37.5%) requiring revision. This series demonstrates a high rate of reconstructive failure and unsatisfactory outcomes from TUG flap breast reconstruction. We feel this reinforces the necessity of adequate pre-operative patient assessment and counselling, including discussion regarding the likelihood of subsequent revisional surgery, before embarking on this form of autologous breast reconstruction.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Canadian Cancer Society
        Canadian cancer statistics. 2010.
        2011
        • Elder E.E.
        • Brandberg Y.
        • Bjorklund T.
        • et al.
        Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study.
        Breast. 2005; 14: 201-208
        • Wilkins E.G.
        • Cederna P.S.
        • Lowery J.C.
        • et al.
        Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the michigan breast reconstruction outcome study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 1014-1025
        • Werdin F.
        • Peek A.
        • Martin N.C.S.
        • Baumeister S.
        Superior gluteal artery perforator flap in bilateral breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2010; 64: 17-21
        • LoTempio M.M.
        • Allen R.J.
        Breast reconstruction with SGAP and IGAP flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 393-401
        • Mathes S.
        • Nahai F.
        Gracilis flap.
        in: Reconstructive surgery: principles, anatomy and technique. Churchill Livingstone, New York1997: 1173-1191
        • Yousif N.J.
        • Matloub H.S.
        • Kolachalam R.
        • Grunert B.K.
        • Sanger J.R.
        The transverse gracilis musculocutaneous flap.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1992; 29: 482-490
        • Coquerel-Beghin D.
        • Milliez P.-Y.
        • Auquit-Auckbur I.
        • Lemierre G.
        • Duparc F.
        The gracilis musculocutaneous flap: vascular supply of the muscle and skin components.
        Surg Radiol Anat. 2006; 28: 588-595
        • Wechselberger G.
        • Schoeller T.
        The transverse myocutaneous gracilis free flap: a valuable tissue source in autologous breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114: 69-73
        • Arnez Z.M.
        • Pogorelec D.
        • Planinsek F.
        • Ahcan U.
        Breast reconstruction by the free transverse gracilis (TUG) flap.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2004; 57: 20-26
        • Schoeller T.
        • Wechselberger G.
        Breast reconstruction by the free transverse gracilis (TUG) flap.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2004; 57: 481-482
        • Fansa H.
        • Schirmer S.
        • Warnecke I.C.
        • Cervelli A.
        • Frerichs O.
        The transverse myocutaneous gracilis muscle flap: a fast and reliable method for breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122: 1326-1333
        • Schoeller T.
        • Huemer G.M.
        • Wechselberger G.
        The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap for breast reconstruction: guidelines for flap and patient selection.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122: 29-38
        • Enajat M.
        • Smit J.M.
        • Rozen W.M.
        • et al.
        Aesthetic refinements and reoperative procedures following 370 consecutive DIEP and SIEA flap breast reconstructions: important considerations for patient consent.
        Aesthet Plast Surg. 2010; 34: 306-312
        • Damen T.H.C.
        • Mureau M.A.M.
        • Timman R.
        • Rakhorst H.A.
        • Hofer S.O.P.
        The pleasing end result after DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a review of additional operations.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62: 71-76
        • Hofer S.O.P.
        • Damen T.H.C.
        • Mureau M.A.M.
        • Rakhorst H.A.
        • Roche N.A.
        A critical review of perioperative complications in 175 free deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstructions.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 59: 137-142
        • Visser N.J.
        • Damen T.H.C.
        • Timman R.
        • Hofer S.O.P.
        • Mureau M.A.M.
        Surgical results, aesthetic outcome, and patient satisfaction after microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction following failed implant reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 26-36
        • Vega S.J.
        • Sandeen S.N.
        • Bossert R.P.
        • et al.
        Gracilis myocutaneous free flap in autologous breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1400-1409
        • Fattah A.
        • Figus A.
        • Mathur B.
        • Ramakrishnan V.V.
        The transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap: technical refinements.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63: 305-313
        • Schmalbruch H.
        • al-Amood W.S.
        • Lewis D.M.
        Morphology of long-term denervated rat soleus muscle and the effect of chronic electrical stimulation.
        J Physiol. 1991; 441: 233-241
        • Kauhanen M.S.C.
        • Salmi A.M.
        • Von Boguslawsky E.K.
        • Leivo I.V.V.
        • Asko-Seljavaara S.L.
        Muscle fiber diameter and muscle type distribution following free microvascular muscle transfers: a prospective study.
        Microsurgery. 1998; 18: 137-144