Summary
Introduction
Alveolar bone grafting is known to reduce nasal asymmetry by supporting a defective
alar base and a sunken nostril. However, there are no studies which include details
of changes to the upper lip with appropriate measurements. The purpose of this study
was to measure the change in the upper lip height and nostril sill after alveolar
bone grafting, using photogrammetry.
Materials and methods
The study included 18 unilateral cleft lip alveolus (UCLA) patients who were diagnosed
with unilateral cleft lip and palate (mean age, 9.87 years). The patients underwent
alveolar bone grafting with iliac bone between June 2007 and June 2008. The average
follow-up period was 16.6 months. The average bone graft volume was 2.39 cm3.
We obtained photographs of the frontal, lateral and basal views using standardised
photographic techniques. We defined 14 landmarks and measured the distance of 11 points
(distance items) for the determination of upper lip height, upper lip projection and
nostril sill elevation. We defined the proportion index as the ratio of the cleft
side to non-cleft side or reference line (R). We compared the preoperative proportion
index with the postoperative proportion index for each distance items.
Results
The height of the upper lip increased significantly in four of five distance items.
The projection of the upper lip was more prominent, but it was not statistically significant.
The nostril sill was significantly elevated in all four distance items.
Conclusion
The height of the upper lip was elongated and the nostril sill was elevated after
alveolar bone grafting in UCLA patients.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment.Cleft Palate J. 1986; 23: 175-205
- The reconstruction of anterior residual bone defects in patients with cleft lip, alveolus and palate. A review.J Maxillofac Surg. 1985; 13: 197-208
- Ensuring success in alveolar bone grafting: a three-dimensional approach.J Craniofac Surg. 2007; 18: 855-859
- Free periosteal graft repair of maxillary clefts in adolescents.Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984; 73: 556-565
- Is photogrammetry of the face reliable?.Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980; 66: 346-355
- Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Anatolian Turkish adults.J Craniofac Surg. 2008; 19: 1481-1486
- Anthropometry of the head and face, chapter 2: examinations.2nd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, New York1985 (31–45)
- Anthropometry of the head and face, chapter 5: photogrammetry of the face.2nd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, New York1985 (113–165)
- Comparison of anthropometry with photogrammetry based on a standardized clinical photographic technique using a cephalostat and chair.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010; 38: 96-107
- Digital surface photogrammetry for anthropometric analysis of the cleft infant face.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006; 43: 350-355
- Photogrammetric facial analysis of attractive Korean entertainers.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009; 33: 167-174
- Three-dimensional analysis of facial symmetry in cleft lip and palate patients using optical surface data.J Orofac Orthop. 2008; 69: 268-282
- Photogrammetric assessment of the soft tissue profile in unilateral cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002; 39: 597-603
- Change in grafted secondary alveolar bone in patients with UCLP and UCLA. A three-dimensional computed tomography study.Angle Orthod. 2008; 78: 631-640
Article info
Publication history
Published online: December 23, 2011
Accepted:
November 21,
2011
Received:
June 15,
2011
Identification
Copyright
© 2011 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.