Advertisement
Case report| Volume 65, ISSUE 7, P966-968, July 2012

The deleterious impact of primary care-based commissioning on plastic surgery services and patients

  • Z. Ahmad
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 (0) 1782 552718; fax: +44 (0) 1782 553531.
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, City General Hospital, University Hospitals North Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire ST4 6QC, UK
    Search for articles by this author
  • W. Kisku
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, City General Hospital, University Hospitals North Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire ST4 6QC, UK
    Search for articles by this author
  • W. Jaffe
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, City General Hospital, University Hospitals North Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire ST4 6QC, UK
    Search for articles by this author
Published:December 02, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.11.020

      Summary

      The wide variation in the availability of treatments across the National Health Service (NHS) in England has led to a postcode lottery due to the rationing of available services by individual Primary Care Trusts (PCTs). In 2005 an NHS Modernisation Agency document, “Action on Plastic Surgery” was designed to aid PCTs making funding decisions on Plastic Surgery patients. Despite this and evidence in the Plastic Surgery literature, patients continue to experience difficulties in the primary care setting accessing our services.

      Policy and procedure for the authorisation and management of individual funding requests. Stoke on Trent Primary Care Trust, http://www.medlaw.eu/pdf/Stoke.PCT.IFR.23.11.10.pdf.

      The authors present two patients who presented to their GPs requesting to seen by the local Plastic Surgery service regarding their symptoms in an effort to explore the possible available treatment modalities. These patients were not referred and subsequently these patients operated upon themselves leading to complications which warranted inpatient management.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Henderson J.
        The plastic surgery postcode lottery in England.
        Int J Surg. 2009; 7 ([Epub Sep 30]): 550-558
      1. Information for commissioners of plastic surgery services. Action on Plastic Surgery, National Guidelines, NHS Modernisation Agency, http://www.glospct.nhs.uk/pdf/publications/innf/commissionersplasticsurgery.

      2. Policy and procedure for the authorisation and management of individual funding requests. Stoke on Trent Primary Care Trust, http://www.medlaw.eu/pdf/Stoke.PCT.IFR.23.11.10.pdf.

        • Greenbaum A.R.
        • Donne J.
        • Wilson D.
        • Dunn K.W.
        Intentional burn injury: an evidence-based, clinical and forensic review.
        Burns. 2004 Nov; 30: 628-642
        • Schlozman S.C.
        Upper-extremity self-amputation and replantation: 2 case reports and a review of the literature.
        J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Dec; 59: 681-686
        • Coons P.M.
        • Ascher-Svanum H.
        • Bellis K.
        Self-amputation of the female breast.
        Psychosomatics. 1986 Sep; 27: 667-668
        • Kannan R.Y.
        • Sankar T.K.
        • Ward D.J.
        The disaster of DIY breast augmentation.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63 ([Epub 2009 Feb 28]): e100-e101
        • Harper J.G.
        • Paetau A.A.
        • Georgi D.E.
        • Lind D.S.
        Self-inflicted chemical dermatitis presenting as a breast infection.
        Breast J. 2008 May–Jun; 14: 305-307
        • Schwartz D.L.
        • So H.B.
        • Schneider K.M.
        • Becker J.M.
        Chronic insertion of foreign bodies into the mature breast.
        J Pediatr Surg. 1977 Oct; 12: 743-744
        • Ping Tsao C.I.
        • Negrette G.
        • Riley A.
        Self-amputation of the nipples and penis in a nonpsychotic, non-gender-dysphoric man.
        Psychosomatics. 2009 Mar–Apr; 50: 178-180
        • Wraight W.M.
        • Tay S.K.
        • Nduka C.
        • Pereira J.A.
        Bilateral breast reduction surgery in England: a postcode lottery.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007; 60 ([Epub 2007 Apr 30]): 1039-1044
        • Jeevan R.
        • Birch J.
        • Armstrong A.P.
        Travelling abroad for aesthetic surgery: informing healthcare practitioners and providers while improving patient safety.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Feb; 64 ([Epub 2010 May 11]): 143-147
        • Veale D.
        Outcome of cosmetic surgery and DIY surgery in patients with Body Dysmorphic Disorder.
        Psychiatr Bull. 2000; 24: 218-221
      3. CEL 30, The exceptional aesthetic referral protocol. NHS Treatment Standard, http://www.18weeks.scot.nhs.uk/task-and-finish-groups/plastic-surgery.