We recently read the correspondence by Whitaker et al. in the journal and while we
appreciate their scientific efforts we find that some of the statements made in the
article to be rather misleading.
1
The authors correctly state that their group has been highly influential in the elucidation
of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) as a method of imaging the vascular anatomy
of the abdominal wall, although the idea was first published by others who have also
made considerable contributions.To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Dynamic infared thermography for the preoperative planning of microsurgical breast reconstruction: a comparison with CTA.J Plast Recons Aesth Surg. 2012; 65: 132
- Dynamic Infrared Thermography.in: Nahabedian M.Y. Toolbox for autologous breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. vol. 38. 2011: 277-292
- The value of Dynamic Infrared Thermography (DIRT) in perforator selection and planning of free DIEP flaps.Ann Plast Surg. 2009; 63: 278-283
- The deep inferior epigastric artery free skin flap: anatomic study and clinical application.Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 91: 853-863
- Computed Tomography Angiography: clinical applications.in: Nahabedian M.Y. Toolbox for autologous breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. vol. 38. 2011: 228-239
Article info
Publication history
Published online: November 30, 2011
Identification
Copyright
© 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Re: Digital infrared thermography for the pre-operative planning of microsurgical breast reconstruction: A comparison with CTAJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic SurgeryVol. 65Issue 5
- PreviewWe would like to take the opportunity to reply to the letter by de Weerd, Weum and Mercer.1 The authors present an emotive response to our ‘correspondence’ to this journal, using terms such as ‘misleading’ to describe our contribution to the Journal.2 Their personal attack on our original comparison of two techniques for imaging perforators is to a large degree unfounded, and we would like to clarify our position.
- Full-Text
- Preview