Research Article| Volume 65, ISSUE 3, P372-378, March 2012

Association between plate location and plate removal following facial fracture repair

Published:October 26, 2011DOI:



      Titanium-based plates used to repair facial fractures are sometimes removed despite their high biocompatibility. Local discomfort can lead to plate removal surgery. Local discomfort may differ according to patient characteristics, tissue properties and plate thickness; however, little is known about the relationship between these conditions and plate removal.


      We performed a hospital-based, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent internal fixation for facial or frontal bone fracture. To identify factors associated with plate removal, we used multivariate logistic regression models.


      Data from 138 patients were analysed. All plates were made of commercially pure titanium, and all screws were made of titanium, 6% aluminium and 4% vanadium alloy. Plate thickness was 1.2 mm or 0.6 mm. Among plate locations, the frontozygomatic suture showed the highest percentage of complications (84%, 86 of 102 patients). The majority consisted of palpability and visibility. In patients who underwent plate removal (n = 96), all plates and screws were removed successfully. All plate-related complications were resolved after plate removal. No complications were introduced by plate removal. Plates 1.2 mm in thickness on the frontozygomatic suture had a relative risk of complications 2.48 times (95% confidence interval, 1.13–5.43) that of plates 0.6 mm in thickness. By multivariate analysis, the presence of plates on the frontozygomatic suture was a significant and independent risk factor for removal. Patients with plates on the frontozygomatic suture had a risk of plate removal 3.95 times (95% confidence interval, 1.55–10.07; P < 0.01) that of patients without plates on the frontozygomatic suture.


      Plates on the frontozygomatic suture have a high rate of complications. Thick plates increase these risks. Patients with plates on the frontozygomatic suture are more likely to undergo plate removal surgery than patients without plates on the frontozygomatic suture.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Soejima K.
        • Sakurai H.
        • Nozaki M.
        • et al.
        Semi-closed reduction of tripod fractures of zygoma under intraoperative assessment using ultrasonography.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62: 499-505
        • Haug R.H.
        Retention of asymptomatic bone plates used for orthognathic surgery and facial fractures.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 54: 611-617
        • Jackson I.T.
        • Adham M.N.
        Metallic plate stabilisation of bone grafts in craniofacial surgery.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1986; 39: 341-344
        • von Domarus H.
        Stabilisation of the mandible by A.O. compression plate after mandibulotomy.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1981; 34: 389-391
        • Woodman J.L.
        • Black J.
        • Nunamaker D.M.
        Release of cobalt and nickel from a new total finger joint prosthesis made of vitallium.
        J Biomed Mater Res. 1983; 17: 655-668
        • Blake G.B.
        • MacFarlane M.R.
        • Hinton J.W.
        Titanium in reconstructive surgery of the skull and face.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1990; 43: 528-535
        • Merritt K.
        • Margevicius R.W.
        • Brown S.A.
        Storage and elimination of titanium, aluminum, and vanadium salts, in vivo.
        J Biomed Mater Res. 1992; 26: 1503-1515
        • Woodman J.L.
        • Jacobs J.J.
        • Galante J.O.
        • Urban R.M.
        Metal ion release from titanium-based prosthetic segmental replacements of long bones in baboons: a long-term study.
        J Orthop Res. 1984; 1: 421-430
        • Manor Y.
        • Chaushu G.
        • Taicher S.
        Risk factors contributing to symptomatic plate removal in orthognathic surgery patients.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 57: 679-682
        • Alpert B.
        • Seligson D.
        Removal of asymptomatic bone plates used for orthognathic surgery and facial fractures.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 54: 618-621
        • Kuvat S.V.
        • Cizmeci O.
        • Bicer A.
        • et al.
        Improving bony stability in maxillofacial surgery: use of osteogenetic materials in patients with profound (> or =5mm) maxillary advancement, a clinical study.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62: 639-645
        • Malata C.M.
        • McLean N.R.
        • Alvi R.
        • et al.
        An evaluation of the Wurzburg titanium miniplate osteosynthesis system for mandibular fixation.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1997; 50: 26-32
        • Islamoglu K.
        • Coskunfirat O.K.
        • Tetik G.
        • Ozgentas H.E.
        Complications and removal rates of miniplates and screws used for maxillofacial fractures.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2002; 48: 265-268
        • Chaushu G.
        • Manor Y.
        • Shoshani Y.
        • Taicher S.
        Risk factors contributing to symptomatic plate removal in maxillofacial trauma patients.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 521-525
        • Francel T.J.
        • Birely B.C.
        • Ringelman P.R.
        • Manson P.N.
        The fate of plates and screws after facial fracture reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992; 90: 568-573
        • Murthy A.S.
        • Lehman Jr., J.A.
        Symptomatic plate removal in maxillofacial trauma: a review of 76 cases.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 55: 603-607
        • Stone I.E.
        • Dodson T.B.
        • Bays R.A.
        Risk factors for infection following operative treatment of mandibular fractures: a multivariate analysis.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 91: 64-68
        • Mak P.H.
        • Campbell R.C.
        • Irwin M.G.
        • American Society of A
        The ASA physical status classification: inter-observer consistency. American Society of Anesthesiologists.
        Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002; 30: 633-640
        • Lim L.H.
        • Lam L.K.
        • Moore M.H.
        • Trott J.A.
        • David D.J.
        Associated injuries in facial fractures: review of 839 patients.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1993; 46: 635-638
        • Back C.P.
        • McLean N.R.
        • Anderson P.J.
        • David D.J.
        The conservative management of facial fractures: indications and outcomes.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007; 60: 146-151
        • MacKinnon C.A.
        • David D.J.
        • Cooter R.D.
        Blindness and severe visual impairment in facial fractures: an 11 year review.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2002; 55: 1-7
        • Nguyen V.
        • Wollstein R.
        Civilian gunshot wounds to the fingers treated with primary bone grafting.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62: e551-e555
        • Nagase D.Y.
        • Courtemanche D.J.
        • Peters D.A.
        Plate removal in traumatic facial fractures: 13-year practice review.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 55: 608-611
        • Lee J.W.
        Treatment of enophthalmos using corrective osteotomy with concomitant cartilage–graft implantation.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63: 42-53
        • Chen C.T.
        • Lai J.P.
        • Chen Y.R.
        • et al.
        Application of endoscope in zygomatic fracture repair.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2000; 53: 100-105
        • Kim M.G.
        • Kim B.K.
        • Park J.L.
        • et al.
        The use of bioabsorbable plate fixation for nasal fractures under local anaesthesia through open lacerations.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008; 61: 696-699
        • Xia Z.
        • Triffitt J.T.
        A review on macrophage responses to biomaterials.
        Biomed Mater. 2006; 1: R1-R9
        • Brown J.S.
        • Trotter M.
        • Cliffe J.
        • Ward-Booth R.P.
        • Williams E.D.
        The fate of miniplates in facial trauma and orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989; 27: 306-315
        • Iizuka T.
        • Lindqvist C.
        • Hallikainen D.
        • Paukku P.
        Infection after rigid internal fixation of mandibular fractures: a clinical and radiologic study.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991; 49: 585-593
        • Moreno J.C.
        • Fernandez A.
        • Ortiz J.A.
        • Montalvo J.J.
        Complication rates associated with different treatments for mandibular fractures.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 58 (discussion p. 80–1): 273-280
        • Assem F.L.
        • Levy L.S.
        A review of current toxicological concerns on vanadium pentoxide and other vanadium compounds: gaps in knowledge and directions for future research.
        J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2009; 12: 289-306
        • O’Connell J.
        • Murphy C.
        • Ikeagwuani O.
        • Adley C.
        • Kearns G.
        The fate of titanium miniplates and screws used in maxillofacial surgery: a 10 year retrospective study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38: 731-735