An analysis of delayed breast reconstruction outcomes as recorded in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

References

1. • Khuri S.F.
   • Daley J.
   • Henderson W.
   • et al.
   The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care.
   J Am Coll Surg. 1995; 180: 519-531
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • American College of Surgeons
   National surgical quality improvement programme [ACS NSQIP website].
   (Available at:)2008
   www.acsnsqip.org/
   ([accessed 20.09.10])
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Khuri S.F.
   • Daley J.
   • Henderson W.G.
   The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs.
   Arch Surg. 2002; 137: 20-27
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Khuri S.F.
   • Henderson W.G.
   • Daley J.
   • et al.
   Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the patient safety in surgery study.
   Ann Surg. 2008; 248: 329-336
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Neuman H.B.
   • Michelassi F.
   • Turner J.W.
   • et al.
   Surrounded by quality metrics: what do surgeons think of ACS-NSQIP?.
   Surgery. 2009; 145: 27-33
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Cohen M.E.
   • Bilimoria K.Y.
   • Ko C.Y.
   • et al.
   Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery.
   J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208: 1009-1016
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Cohen M.E.
   • Bilimoria K.Y.
   • Ko C.Y.
   • et al.
   Variability in length of stay after colorectal surgery: assessment of 182 hospitals in the national surgical quality improvement program.
   Ann Surg. 2009; 250: 901-907
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Feinglass J.
   • Pearce W.H.
   • Martin G.J.
   • et al.
   Postoperative and late survival outcomes after major amputation: findings from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
   Surgery. 2001; 130: 21-29
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Feinglass J.
   • Pearce W.H.
   • Martin G.J.
   • et al.
   Postoperative and amputation-free survival outcomes after femorodistal bypass grafting surgery: findings from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
   J Vasc Surg. 2001; 34: 283-290
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Gedaly R.
    • McHugh P.P.
    • Johnston T.D.
    • et al.
    Obesity, diabetes, and smoking are important determinants of resource utilization in liver resection: a multicenter analysis of 1029 patients.
    Ann Surg. 2009; 249: 414-419
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Grossmann E.M.
    • Longo W.E.
    • Virgo K.S.
    • et al.
    Morbidity and mortality of gastrectomy for cancer in Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.
    Surgery. 2002; 131: 484-490
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Hua H.T.
    • Cambria R.P.
    • Chuang S.K.
    • et al.
    Early outcomes of endovascular versus open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the national surgical quality improvement program-private sector (NSQIP-PS).
    J Vasc Surg. 2005; 41: 382-389
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Hutter M.M.
    • Randall S.
    • Khuri S.F.
    • et al.
    Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the national surgical quality improvement program.
    Ann Surg. 2006; 243 (Discussion 662–656): 657-662
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Johnson 3rd, O.N.
    • Sidawy A.N.
    • Scanlon J.M.
    • et al.
    Impact of obesity on outcomes after open surgical and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210: 166-177
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Kaafarani H.M.
    • Smith T.S.
    • Neumayer L.
    • et al.
    Trends, outcomes, and predictors of open and conversion to open cholecystectomy in Veterans Health Administration hospitals.
    Am J Surg. 2010; 200: 32-40
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Livingston E.H.
    • Arterburn D.
    • Schifftner T.L.
    • et al.
    National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis of bariatric operations: modifiable risk factors contribute to bariatric surgical adverse outcomes.
    J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 203: 625-633
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Margenthaler J.A.
    • Longo W.E.
    • Virgo K.S.
    • et al.
    Risk factors for adverse outcomes following surgery for small bowel obstruction.
    Ann Surg. 2006; 243: 456-464
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Margenthaler J.A.
    • Longo W.E.
    • Virgo K.S.
    • et al.
    Risk factors for adverse outcomes after the surgical treatment of appendicitis in adults.
    Ann Surg. 2003; 238: 59-66
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Neumayer L.
    • Hosokawa P.
    • Itani K.
    • et al.
    Multivariable predictors of postoperative surgical site infection after general and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study.
    J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204: 1178-1187
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Tuggle K.R.
    • Ortega G.
    • Bolorunduro O.B.
    • et al.
    Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in complicated appendicitis: a review of the NSQIP database.
    J Surg Res. 2010;
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Corman J.M.
    • Penson D.F.
    • Hur K.
    • et al.
    Comparison of complications after radical and partial nephrectomy: results from the national veterans administration surgical quality improvement program.
    BJU Int. 2000; 86: 782-789
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Wallner L.P.
    • Dunn R.L.
    • Sarma A.V.
    • et al.
    Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after urologic surgery: the national surgical quality improvement program.
    J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 904-913
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Fehringer E.V.
    • Mikuls T.R.
    • Michaud K.D.
    • et al.
    Shoulder arthroplasties have fewer complications than hip or knee arthroplasties in US veterans.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468: 717-722
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Radcliff T.A.
    • Henderson W.G.
    • Stoner T.J.
    • et al.
    Patient risk factors, operative care, and outcomes among older community-dwelling male veterans with hip fracture.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 34-42
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Podratz K.C.
    Quality improvement in gynecologic surgery: the new frontier.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 891-895
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Kezirian E.J.
    • Weaver E.M.
    • Yueh B.
    • et al.
    Incidence of serious complications after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty.
    Laryngoscope. 2004; 114: 450-453
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Schwartz S.R.
    • Yueh B.
    • Maynard C.
    • et al.
    Predictors of wound complications after laryngectomy: a study of over 2000 patients.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 131: 61-68
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Birkmeyer J.D.
    • Shahian D.M.
    • Dimick J.B.
    • et al.
    Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: national surgical quality improvement program.
    J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 777-782
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • American Society of Plastic Surgeons
    2010 report of the 2009 statistics; national clearinghouse of plastics surgery statistics [ASPS website].
    (Available at:)2010
    http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/Media/statistics/2009-US-cosmeticreconstructiveplasticsurgeryminimally-invasive-statistics.pdf
    ([accessed 20.09.10])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    User guide for the 2008 participant use data file [NSQIP online user guide].
    (Available at:)2009
    https://acsnsqip.org/puf/docs/ACS_NSQIP_Participant_User_Data_File_User_Guide.pdf
    ([accessed 20.09.10])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Vega S.
    • Smartt Jr., J.M.
    • Jiang S.
    • et al.
    500 Consecutive patients with free TRAM flap breast reconstruction: a single surgeon’s experience.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122: 329-339
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
32. • McCarthy C.M.
    • Mehrara B.J.
    • Riedel E.
    • et al.
    Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 1886-1892
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
33. • Chen C.M.
    • Halvorson E.G.
    • Disa J.J.
    • et al.
    Immediate postoperative complications in DIEP versus free/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120: 1477-1482
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
34. • Alderman A.K.
    • Wilkins E.G.
    • Kim H.M.
    • et al.
    Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the michigan breast reconstruction outcome study.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109: 2265-2274
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
35. • Olsen M.A.
    • Lefta M.
    • Dietz J.R.
    • et al.
    Risk factors for surgical site infection after major breast operation.
    J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 326-335
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
36. • Sullivan S.R.
    • Fletcher D.R.
    • Isom C.D.
    • et al.
    True incidence of all complications following immediate and delayed breast reconstruction.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122: 19-28
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
37. • Crespo L.D.
    • Eberlein T.J.
    • O’Connor N.
    • et al.
    Postmastectomy complications in breast reconstruction.
    Ann Plast Surg. 1994; 32: 452-456
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
38. • Chang D.W.
    • Wang B.
    • Robb G.L.
    • et al.
    Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 1640-1648
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
39. • Greco 3rd, J.A.
    • Castaldo E.T.
    • Nanney L.B.
    • et al.
    Autologous breast reconstruction: the Vanderbilt experience (1998 to 2005) of independent predictors of displeasing outcomes.
    J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 49-56
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
40. • Selber J.C.
    • Kurichi J.E.
    • Vega S.J.
    • et al.
    Risk factors and complications in free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
    Ann Plast Surg. 2006; 56: 492-497
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
41. • Tran N.V.
    • Evans G.R.
    • Kroll S.S.
    • et al.
    Postoperative adjuvant irradiation: effects on tranverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106 (Discussion 318–320): 313-317
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
42. • Woerdeman L.A.
    • Hage J.J.
    • Hofland M.M.
    • et al.
    A prospective assessment of surgical risk factors in 400 cases of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants to establish selection criteria.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119: 455-463
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
43. • Lee B.T.
    • Adesiyun T.A.
    • Colakoglu S.
    • et al.
    Postmastectomy radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: an analysis of complications and patient satisfaction.
    Ann Plast Surg. 2010; 64: 679-683
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
44. • Pinsolle V.
    • Grinfeder C.
    • Mathoulin-Pelissier S.
    • et al.
    Complications analysis of 266 immediate breast reconstructions.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006; 59: 1017-1024
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
45. • Spear S.L.
    • Ducic I.
    • Cuoco F.
    • et al.
    The effect of smoking on flap and donor-site complications in pedicled TRAM breast reconstruction.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 116: 1873-1880
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
46. • Goodwin S.J.
    • McCarthy C.M.
    • Pusic A.L.
    • et al.
    Complications in smokers after postmastectomy tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
    Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 55 (Discussion 19–20): 16-19
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
47. • Neumayer L.
    How do (and why should) I use the national surgical quality improvement program?.
    Am J Surg. 2009; 198: S36-S40
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
48. • Hall B.L.
    • Richards K.
    • Ingraham A.
    • et al.
    New approaches to the national surgical quality improvement program: the American College of Surgeons experience.
    Am J Surg. 2009; 198: S56-S62
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
49. • Hammermeister K.
    The national surgical quality improvement program: learning from the past and moving to the future.
    Am J Surg. 2009; 198: S69-S73
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
50. • British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons
    National mastectomy and breast reconstruction audit 2011.
    (Available at:)
    http://www.bapras.org.uk/page.asp?id=750
    ([accessed 17.05.11])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar