Case report| Volume 65, ISSUE 4, P513-516, April 2012

Artery only microanastomosis in nose replantation: A report of two cases

Published:October 19, 2011DOI:


      The nose is a central, prominent unit of the face. The surgical approach to complete nasal amputations is challenging and an experienced microsurgical team should always attempt microvascular replantation. This one-stage procedure could result in a superior clinical outcome compared to delayed reconstructive procedures.
      Two successful microvascular replantations of the distal half of the nose were performed. Both amputations were the result of two completely different aetiologies (sharp guillotine-like vs. avulsion trauma). However, we were not able to re-establish the venous drainage, which was managed through medicinal leeching.
      Both replantations resulted in an aesthetically pleasing result and no additional surgery was needed.
      A microsurgical replantation attempt should always be attempted in nasal amputations and the inability to perform venous anastomosis should not preclude the replant attempt.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Pederson W.C.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 823-841
        • Kim S.
        • Jeong H.
        • Choi T.H.
        • Kim J.S.
        Successful re-plantation of an amputated nasal segment by supermicrosurgery: a case report and review of the literature.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63: e380-e383
        • Hammond D.C.
        • Bouwense C.L.
        • Hankins W.T.
        • Maxwell-Davis G.S.
        • Furdyna J.
        • Capraro P.A.
        Microsurgical replantation of the amputated nose.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 2133-2136
        • Grabb W.C.
        • Dingman R.O.
        The fate of amputated tissues of the head and neck following replacement.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972; 49: 28-32
        • Hussain G.
        • Thomson S.
        • Zielinski V.
        Nasal amputation due to human bite: microsurgical replantation.
        Aust N Z J Surg. 1997; 67: 382-384
        • Nakajima H.
        • Imanishi N.
        • Aiso S.
        Facial artery in the upper lip and nose: anatomy and a clinical application.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109: 855-861
        • Niazi Z.
        • Lee T.C.
        • Eadie P.
        • Lawlor D.
        Succesful replantation of nose by microsurgical technique, and review of the literature.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1990; 43: 617-620
        • Sanchez-Olaso A.
        Replantation of an amputated nasal tip with open venous drainage.
        Microsurgery. 1993; 14: 380-383
        • Kayikcioglu A.
        • Karamürsel S.
        • Keçik A.
        Replantation of nearly total nose amputation without venous anastomosis.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 108: 702-704
        • Flores R.L.
        • Bastidas N.
        • Galiano R.D.
        Successful replantation of an amputated nose after dog bite injury.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 136: 326-327