Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 60, ISSUE 12, P1309-1312, December 2007

The Asplund-Davies vertical scar breast reduction technique preserves the sub-areolar skin thickness in the long term: a matched comparative study with the inverted T technique

      Summary

      Background and aim

      The inverted T technique, a popular method of breast reduction, relies on stretching the skin over glandular breast tissue to create the breast shape. The Asplund-Davies vertical scar method of breast reduction by contrast uses glanduloplasty to create the desired breast shape, achieving tension-free skin closure. Indeed the skin at the end of the vertical scar technique is wrinkled. It is known from tissue expansion literature that when skin is placed under tension the dermis becomes thinner. In this pilot cross-sectional study we compared breast skin thickness between two matched groups of patients undergoing breast reduction either with the inverted T or the vertical scar techniques, to determine whether the method of breast reduction impacts on breast skin thickness in the long term.

      Materials and Method

      With a high frequency ultrasound machine the breast skin thickness of 24 breasts, 12 in each group, was measured by an independent consultant radiologist. Patients were matched in terms of age, time since operation, Fitzpatrick skin type, preoperative cup size and the amount of tissue resected.

      Results

      The breast skin in the inverted T group was significantly thinner than the vertical scar group (P<0.001). The inverted T group also had thinner skin in comparison to its control point (P<0.05). The vertical scar group had comparable skin thickness compared to its control point (P>0.05).

      Conclusion

      This pilot study suggests that tension-free closure of skin with the vertical scar technique maintains breast skin thickness. Maintenance of breast skin thickness in this group may in turn contribute to the long term preservation of breast shape and form.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rohrich R.J.
        • Gosman A.A.
        • Brown S.A.
        • et al.
        Current preferences for breast reduction techniques: a survey of board-certified plastic surgeons 2002.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114 ([discussion 1734–6]): 1724-1733
        • Olenius M.
        • Jurell G.
        Breast reconstruction using tissue expansion.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1992; 26: 83-90
        • Lassus C.
        A 30-year experience with vertical mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 97: 373-380
        • Lassus C.
        Breast reduction: evolution of a technique–a single vertical scar.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1987; 11: 107-112
        • Lassus C.
        Reduction mammaplasty with short inframammary scars.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986; 77: 680-681
        • Lassus C.
        A technique for breast reduction.
        Int Surg. 1970; 53: 69-72
        • Lejour M.
        • Abboud M.
        • Declety A.
        • et al.
        Reduction of mammaplasty scars: from a short inframammary scar to a vertical scar.
        Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1990; 35: 369-379
        • Lejour M.
        Vertical mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92: 985-986
        • Lejour M.
        Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction of the breast.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994; 94: 100-114
        • Lejour M.
        Vertical mammaplasty: early complications after 250 personal consecutive cases.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104: 764-770
        • Asplund O.A.
        • Davies D.M.
        Vertical scar breast reduction with medial flap or glandular transposition of the nipple-areola.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1996; 49: 507-514
        • Strombeck J.O.
        Reduction mammaplasty.
        Surg Clin North Am. 1971; 51: 453-469
        • Alexander H.
        • Miller D.L.
        Determining skin thickness with pulsed ultra sound.
        J Invest Dermatol. 1979; 72: 17-19
        • Tan C.Y.
        • Statham B.
        • Marks R.
        • et al.
        Skin thickness measurement by pulsed ultrasound: its reproducibility, validation and variability.
        Br J Dermatol. 1982; 106: 657-667
        • Cammarota T.
        • Pinto F.
        • Magliaro A.
        • et al.
        Current uses of diagnostic high-frequency US in dermatology.
        Eur J Radiol. 1998; 27: S215-S223
        • Bauer J.A.
        • Sauer T.
        Cutaneous 10MHz ultrasound B scan allows the quantitative assessment of burn depth.
        Burns Incl Therm Inj. 1989; 15: 49-51
        • Milner S.M.
        • Memar O.M.
        • Gherardini G.
        • et al.
        The histological interpretation of high frequency cutaneous ultrasound imaging.
        Dermatol Surg. 1997; 23: 43-45
        • Ulger H.
        • Erdogan N.
        • Kumanlioglu S.
        • et al.
        Effect of age, breast size, menopausal and hormonal status on mammographic skin thickness.
        Skin Res Technol. 2003; 9: 284-289
        • Pope Jr., T.L.
        • Read M.E.
        • Medsker T.
        • et al.
        Breast skin thickness: normal range and causes of thickening shown on film-screen mammography.
        J Can Assoc Radiol. 1984; 35: 365-368
        • Willson S.A.
        • Adam E.J.
        • Tucker A.K.
        Patterns of breast skin thickness in normal mammograms.
        Clin Radiol. 1982; 33: 691-693
        • Argenta L.C.
        • Marks M.W.
        • Pasyk K.A.
        Advances in tissue expansion.
        Clin Plast Surg. 1985; 12: 159-171
        • Johnson T.M.
        • Lowe L.
        • Brown M.D.
        • et al.
        Histology and physiology of tissue expansion.
        J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1993; 19: 1074-1078