Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 60, ISSUE 9, P1067-1073, September 2007

Bibliographic characteristics of plastic surgeons in The Netherlands: a 55-year survey

  • Martijn P.J. Loonen
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • J. Joris Hage
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Address: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121 NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 512 2979; fax: +31 20 512 2554.
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • Moshe Kon
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author

      Summary

      Background

      The allotment of grants is increasingly dependent on benchmarking of scientific output. Still, data to benchmark such output for plastic surgeons are lacking. Therefore, we retrieved these data for plastic surgeons in The Netherlands.

      Methods

      We analysed the bibliographic and some biographic characteristics of all 223 plastic surgeons registered in The Netherlands from 1950 through 2004, as well as of all 61 trainee plastic surgeons. Biographic characteristics were obtained through the Netherlands Society of Plastic Surgery and bibliographic characteristics were retrieved from PubMed® and the Science Citation Index®. With these data, we established a trend of publications at various moments in the careers of plastic surgeons.

      Results

      The age at graduation from medical school (27 years) and at the defence of PhD before registration (32 years) did not differ between specialists and residents. Eighteen residents (0.30) had already obtained a PhD, compared to the 34 specialists (0.15) who obtained their PhD prior to registration. Specialists made 2396 contributions to 1758 PubMed-indexed articles and residents made 327 contributions to 323 articles. Sixty percent of the specialists had published by the time of registration, whereas 79% of the current residents had already done so. The resident-authors had contributed to more articles (mean 6.8) than their predecessors had done at the moment of their registration (mean 4.7). Surgeons and residents published the greater part of their work in plastic surgery journals with relatively high impact factors. Sixty percent of the articles by residents and 45% of the articles by specialists had been cited by others, and articles by residents obtained a mean of 3.8 citations as compared to 4.3 citations to articles by specialist. Most specialists published until six years after registration.

      Conclusions

      The quantity and quality of publications by plastic surgeons and residents from The Netherlands increased over the studied 55-year period. Most specialists published from the moment of their graduation at medical school until six years after their registration as plastic surgeon. The residents of 2004 published more and better than their predecessors.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Campbell E.G.
        • Weissman J.S.
        • Moy E.
        • et al.
        Status of clinical research in academic health centers: views from the research leadership.
        JAMA. 2000; 286: 800-806
        • Adzick N.S.
        • Scipione A.W.
        Pediatric surgical workload during the past decade: impact on clinical activity and hospital finance at a children's hospital.
        J Pediatr Surg. 1999; 34: 133-136
        • Ko C.Y.
        • Whang E.E.
        • Longmire Jr., W.P.
        • et al.
        Improving the Surgeon's participation in research: is it a problem of training or priority?.
        J Surg Res. 2000; 91: 5-8
        • Ta K.T.
        • Persing J.A.
        • Chauncey Jr., H.
        • et al.
        Effects of managed care on teaching, research, and clinical practice in academic plastic surgery.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2002; 48: 348-354
        • Rangel S.J.
        • Efron B.
        • Moss R.L.
        Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding of surgical research.
        Ann Surg. 2002; 236: 277-286
        • Jimenez-Contreras E.
        • Delgado Lopez-Cozar E.
        • Ruiz-Perez R.
        • et al.
        Impact-factor rewards affect Spanish research.
        Nature. 2002; 417: 898
        • Paladugu R.
        • Schein M.
        • Gardezi S.
        • et al.
        One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals.
        World J Surg. 2002; 26: 1099-1105
        • Seglen P.O.
        Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.
        BMJ. 1997; 314: 498-502
        • Guimaraes J.A.
        • Carlini C.R.
        Most cited papers in Toxicon.
        Toxicon. 2004; 44: 345-359
      1. N.C.B.I.-N.L.M.-N.I.H. Pubmed®. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/.

      2. Thompson-ISI. Science citation index expanded® 1946–2004. Available at: http://portal.isiknowledge.com/.

      3. Thompson-ISI. Journal citation reports®. Available at: http://portal.isiknowledge.com/.

        • Caelleigh A.S.
        PubMed Central and the new publishing landscape: shifts and tradeoffs.
        Acad Med. 2000; 75: 4-10
        • Dellon A.L.
        • Scally A.L.
        • Kuhlemeier K.V.
        Impact of the journal Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992; 90: 717-722
        • Brancati F.L.
        • Mead L.A.
        • Levine D.M.
        • et al.
        Early predictors of career achievement in academic medicine.
        JAMA. 1992; 267: 1372-1376
        • Goodman S.N.
        • Berlin J.
        • Fletcher S.W.
        • et al.
        Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine.
        Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121: 11-21
        • Goldwyn R.M.
        Authorship.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983; 71: 411-412
        • Halsey M.J.
        Science and anaesthesia.
        Anaesthesia. 1985; 40: 733-734
        • Jackson H.H.
        • Jackson J.D.
        • Mulvihill S.J.
        • et al.
        Trends in research support and productivity in the changing environment of academic surgery.
        J Surg Res. 2004; 116: 197-201
        • Umansky J.
        • Taub P.
        • Lorenz H.P.
        • et al.
        Factors determining the ultimate fate of a plastic surgery applicant.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111: 981-984
        • Zook E.G.
        Leaving the fold.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991; 88: 325-327