Research Article| Volume 60, ISSUE 9, P1039-1044, September 2007

Bilateral breast reduction surgery in England: a postcode lottery



      There is good evidence for the benefits of bilateral breast reduction (BBR). However, such surgery is often considered cosmetic and is rationed. The NHS Modernisation Agency and the British Association of Plastic Surgeons (as was) have produced national guidelines, but Primary Care Trusts adapt these for local implementation.


      We surveyed the funding criteria for BBR of all 303 Trusts in England. 245 (81%) responded.


      The NHS guidelines were followed accurately by only 11 Trusts. 198 trusts specified a maximum BMI (range 25 to 32; guideline 30). 187 accepted musculoskeletal symptoms as an indication and 117 accepted intertrigo. 31 required a professionally fitted bra.
      Many Trusts included other restricting criteria that are not in the NHS guidelines. Some Trusts mentioned the American Society of Plastic Surgeons' guidelines, but did not follow them wholly.


      Even with explicit guidelines, considerable variation in local funding criteria exists with resultant inequalities in provision. The so-called ‘postcode lottery’ of healthcare in the UK is rife within Plastic Surgery.
      The recent reconfiguration of English Primary Care Trusts provides an excellent opportunity for the rationalisation of BBR provision and to this end we will distribute our findings and the NHS guidelines to the new Trusts and to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Chadbourne E.B.
        • Zhang S.
        • Gordon M.J.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes in reduction mammaplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2001; 76: 503-510
        • Dabbah A.
        • Lehman Jr., J.A.
        • Parker M.G.
        • et al.
        Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome analysis.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1995; 35: 337-341
        • Klassen A.
        • Jenkinson C.
        • Fitzpatrick R.
        • et al.
        Patients' health related quality of life before and after aesthetic surgery.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1996; 49: 433-438
        • Gonzalez F.
        • Walton R.L.
        • Shafer B.
        • et al.
        Reduction mammaplasty improves symptoms of macromastia.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 91: 1270-1276
        • Kerrigan C.L.
        • Collins E.D.
        • Striplin D.
        • et al.
        The health burden of breast hypertrophy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 108: 1591-1599
        • Kerrigan C.L.
        • Collins E.D.
        • Kneeland T.S.
        • et al.
        Measuring health state preferences in women with breast hypertrophy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 280-288
        • Klassen A.
        • Fitzpatrick R.
        • Jenkinson C.
        • et al.
        Should breast reduction surgery be rationed? A comparison of the health status of patients before and after treatment: postal questionnaire survey.
        BMJ. 1996; 313: 454-457
        • Letterman G.
        • Schurter M.
        The effects of mammary hypertrophy on the skeletal system.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1980; 5: 425-431
        • Iwuagwu O.C.
        • Platt A.J.
        • Stanley P.W.
        • et al.
        Does reduction mammaplasty improve lung function test in women with macromastia? Results of a randomized controlled trial.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118: 1-6
        • O'Blenes C.A.
        • Delbridge C.L.
        • Miller B.J.
        • et al.
        Prospective study of outcomes after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117: 351-358
        • Boschert M.T.
        • Barone C.M.
        • Puckett C.L.
        Outcome analysis of reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 98: 451-454
        • Davis G.M.
        • Ringler S.L.
        • Short K.
        • et al.
        Reduction mammaplasty: long-term efficacy, morbidity, and patient satisfaction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995; 96: 1106-1110
        • Raispis T.
        • Zehring R.D.
        • Downey D.L.
        Long-term functional results after reduction mammaplasty.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1995; 34: 113-116
        • Blomqvist L.
        • Brandberg Y.
        Three-year follow-up on clinical symptoms and health-related quality of life after reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114: 49-54
        • Shakespeare V.
        • Postle K.
        A qualitative study of patients' views on the effects of breast-reduction surgery: a 2-year follow-up survey.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1999; 52: 198-204
      1. Information for Commissioners of Plastic Surgery Services: Referrals and Guidelines in Plastic Surgery. NHS Modernisation Agency, Action on Plastic Surgery.
        Department of Health, London2005
      2. ASPS Recommended Insurance Coverage Criteria for Third-Party Payers: Reduction Mammaplasty. [accessed 4 July 2006].

      3. NHS Health Episode Statistics. OPCS Code B31.1, Reduction Mammoplasty. [accessed 7 November 2006].

      4. Which? Online review – Bra fitting. [accessed 4 July 2006].

        • Greenbaum A.R.
        • Heslop T.
        • Morris J.
        • et al.
        An investigation of the suitability of bra fit in women referred for reduction mammaplasty.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2003; 56: 230-236
      5. [accessed 14 November 2006].

        • Moss A.L.
        Weight discrepancies in surgical and pathological specimens from breast reductions.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1999; 52: 239
        • Zubowski R.
        • Zins J.E.
        • Foray-Kaplon A.
        • et al.
        Relationship of obesity and specimen weight to complications in reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 998-1003
        • Wagner D.S.
        • Alfonso D.R.
        The influence of obesity and volume of resection on success in reduction mammaplasty: an outcomes study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 1034-1038
        • Brown T.P.
        • Ringrose C.
        • Hyland R.E.
        • et al.
        A method of assessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1999; 52 (and subsequent comment: Westreich M. Assessing female breast morphometry and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg 2000;53:358): 355-359
        • Netscher D.T.
        • Meade R.A.
        • Goodman C.M.
        • et al.
        Physical and psychosocial symptoms among 88 volunteer subjects compared with patients seeking plastic surgery procedures to the breast.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 2366-2373
        • Collins E.D.
        • Kerrigan C.L.
        • Kim M.
        • et al.
        The effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical interventions in relieving the symptoms of macromastia.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109: 1556-1566
        • Lahiri A.
        • Duff C.G.
        • Brown T.L.
        • et al.
        Anthropometric measurements and their value in predicting complications following reduction mammaplasty and abdominoplasty.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2006; 56: 248-250
        • Cunningham B.L.
        • Gear A.J.
        • Kerrigan C.L.
        • et al.
        Analysis of breast reduction complications derived from the BRAVO study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 1597-1604
        • Platt A.J.
        • Mohan D.
        • Baguley P.
        The effect of body mass index and wound irrigation on outcome after bilateral breast reduction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2003; 51: 552-555
        • Marin-Bertolin S.
        • Valia Vera J.C.
        • Gonzalez-Martinez R.
        • et al.
        Blood loss and hematological recovery following reduction mammaplasty and dermolipectomy: a prospective study.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1998; 22: 168-172
        • Bowditch M.G.
        • Villar R.N.
        Do obese patients bleed more? A prospective study of blood loss at total hip replacement.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999; 81: 198-200
        • Horan F.
        Obesity and joint replacement.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88: 1269-1271
        • McLaughlin J.R.
        • Lee K.R.
        The outcome of total hip replacement in obese and non-obese patients at 10- to 18-years.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88: 1286-1292
        • Shakespeare V.
        Breast-reduction surgery and obesity.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2000; 53: 172
        • McGregor J.C.
        Breast reduction – rationed or rational?.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1999; 52: 511
        • Tice J.A.
        • Kanaya A.
        • Hue T.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for mortality in middle-aged women.
        Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166: 2469-2477
        • Faria F.S.
        • Guthrie E.
        • Bradbury E.
        • et al.
        Psychosocial outcome and patient satisfaction following breast reduction surgery.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1999; 52: 448-452
        • Hollyman J.A.
        • Lacey J.H.
        • Whitfield P.J.
        • et al.
        Surgery for the psyche: a longitudinal study of women undergoing reduction mammoplasty.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1986; 39: 222-224
        • Shakespeare V.
        • Cole R.P.
        Measuring patient-based outcomes in a plastic surgery service: breast reduction surgical patients.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1997; 50: 242-248
        • Lee M.C.
        • Lehman Jr., J.A.
        • Tantri M.D.
        • et al.
        Bilateral reduction mammoplasty in an adolescent population: adolescent bilateral reduction mammoplasty.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2003; 14: 691-695
        • Evans G.R.
        • Ryan J.J.
        Reduction mammaplasty for the teenage patient: a critical analysis.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1994; 18: 291-297
        • McMahan J.D.
        • Wolfe J.A.
        • Cromer B.A.
        • et al.
        Lasting success in teenage reduction mammaplasty.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1995; 35: 227-231
        • Schumacher H.H.
        Breast reduction and smoking.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 54: 117-119
        • Moller A.
        • Villebro N.
        • Pedersen T.
        Interventions for preoperative smoking cessation.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; ([CD002294])
        • Kawachi I.
        • Colditz G.A.
        • Stampfer M.J.
        • et al.
        Smoking cessation in relation to total mortality rates in women. A prospective cohort study.
        Ann Intern Med. 1993; 119: 992-1000
        • Samet J.M.
        Health benefits of smoking cessation.
        Clin Chest Med. 1991; 12: 669-679
        • Gariti P.
        • Rosenthal D.I.
        • Lindell K.
        • et al.
        Validating a dipstick method for detecting recent smoking.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002; 11: 1123-1125
        • Chan L.K.
        • Withey S.
        • Butler P.E.
        Smoking and wound healing problems in reduction mammaplasty: is the introduction of urine nicotine testing justified?.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2006; 56: 111-115
        • Pearce M.S.
        • Hayes L.
        Newcastle Heart Project; Newcastle Thousand Families Study. Self-reported smoking status and exhaled carbon monoxide: results from two population-based epidemiologic studies in the North of England.
        Chest. 2005; 128: 1233-1238