Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 60, ISSUE 5, P503-508, May 2007

Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes after breast reconstruction: Cross-cultural comparisons of 1-year postoperative results

Published:February 09, 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.10.033

      Summary

      Breast reconstruction has been shown to improve quality of life in women following mastectomy for breast cancer. To date, there have been no published prospective reports looking at the effect nationality has on patient quality of life following breast reconstruction.
      Women from the USA, Sweden and Canada were recruited prior to reconstruction and followed prospectively for 1 year postoperatively. Thirteen centres with 24 plastic surgeons were involved. Preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, women completed the Short Form-36 questionnaire. Data were analysed using t-tests and analysis of variance.
      A total of 313 women were followed up. American women who had immediate expander/implant surgery were compared with Swedish patients, whilst Americans who had undergone transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstructions were compared with Canadians.
      Women benefited from having breast reconstruction, but this improvement was not dependent upon country of origin. Swedish women reported less improvement in one subscale, that of general health, compared with American women (P=0.01). There were no cultural differences detected between Americans and Canadians.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Dean C.
        • Chetty U.
        • Forrest A.P.
        Effects of immediate breast reconstruction on psychosocial morbidity after mastectomy.
        Lancet. 1983; 1: 459-462
        • Filiberti A.
        • Tamburini M.
        • Murru L.
        • et al.
        Psychologic effects and esthetic results of breast reconstruction after mastectomy.
        Tumori. 1986; 72: 585-588
        • Jonsson C.O.
        • Engman K.
        • Asplund O.
        Psychological aspects of breast reconstruction following mastectomy.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984; 18: 317-325
        • Noguchi M.
        • Earashi M.
        • Ohta N.
        • et al.
        Mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction using a musculocutaneous flap.
        Am J Surg. 1993; 166: 279-283
        • Cederna P.S.
        • Yates W.R.
        • Chang P.
        • et al.
        Postmastectomy reconstruction: comparative analysis of the psychosocial, functional, and cosmetic effects of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap versus breast implant reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1995; 35: 458-468
        • Corsten L.A.
        • Suduikis S.V.
        • Donegan W.L.
        Patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction.
        Wis Med J. 1992; 91 (p. 129): 125-126
        • Anderson S.G.
        • Rodin J.
        • Ariyan S.
        Treatment considerations in postmastectomy reconstruction: their relative importance and relationship to patient satisfaction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1984; 33: 263-270
        • Rowland J.H.
        • Holland J.C.
        • Chaglassian T.
        • et al.
        Psychological response to breast reconstruction. Expectations for and impact on postmastectomy functioning.
        Psychosomatics. 1993; 34: 241-250
        • Stevens L.A.
        • McGrath H.M.
        • Druss R.G.
        • et al.
        The psychological impact of immediate breast reconstruction for women with early breast cancer.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984; 73: 619-628
        • Teimourian B.
        • Adham M.N.
        Survey of patients' responses to breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1982; 9: 321-325
        • Brandberg Y.
        • Malm M.
        • Blomqvist L.
        A prospective and randomized study, “SVEA,” comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 66-74
        • Wilkins E.G.
        • Cederna P.S.
        • Lowery J.C.
        • et al.
        Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 1014-1025
        • Edsander-Nord Å
        • Brandberg Y.
        • Wickman M.
        Quality of life, patients' satisfaction, and aesthetic outcome after pedicled or free TRAM flap breast surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 1142-1153
        • Ashing-Giwa K.
        • Ganz P.A.
        • Petersen L.
        Quality of life of African-American and white long term breast carcinoma survivors.
        Cancer. 1999; 85: 418-426
        • Kagawa-Singer M.
        • Wellisch D.K.
        • Durvasula R.
        Impact of breast cancer on Asian American and Anglo American women.
        Cult Med Psychiatry. 1997; 21: 449-480
        • Tseng J.F.
        • Kronowitz S.J.
        • Sun C.C.
        • et al.
        The effect of ethnicity on immediate reconstruction rates after mastectomy for breast cancer.
        Cancer. 2004; 101: 1514-1523
        • Ware J.E.
        • Sherbourne C.D.
        The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey 1. Conceptual framework and item selection.
        Med Care. 1992; 30: 473-483
      1. Stewart A.L. Ware J.E. The medical outcomes study approach. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina1992
        • Stewart A.L.
        • Hays R.D.
        • Ware Jr., J.E.
        The MOS Short-Form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.
        Med Care. 1988; 26: 724-735
        • Sullivan M.
        • Karlsson J.
        • Ware Jr., J.E.
        The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey: I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden.
        Soc Sci Med. 1995; 41: 1349-1358
        • Ware J.E.
        • Snow K.K.
        • Kosinski M.
        • et al.
        SF-36 Health Survey, manual and interpretation guide.
        The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts1993
        • Goin M.K.
        • Goin J.M.
        Psychological reactions to prophylactic mastectomy synchronous with contralateral breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982; 70: 355-359
        • Ringberg A.
        • Tengrup I.
        • Aspegren K.
        • et al.
        Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999; 25: 470-476
        • Schain W.S.
        Breast reconstruction. Update of psychosocial and pragmatic concerns.
        Cancer. 1991; 68: 1170-1175
        • Elder E.E.
        • Brandberg Y.
        • Bjorklund T.
        • et al.
        Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study.
        Breast. 2005; 14: 201-208
        • Alderman A.K.
        • Wilkins E.G.
        • Lowery J.C.
        • et al.
        Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 769-776