Short reports and correspondence| Volume 60, ISSUE 5, P572-573, May 2007

Cross infection risk in surgical marking pens

Published:February 02, 2007DOI:
      Hospital acquired infection is a major issue for the NHS and is in the forefront of patient's minds when admitted to hospital. It has also stretched beyond healthcare into the political arena. Hospital equipment has been shown to be a vector for infection. It has long been known that stethoscopes, Doppler probes, otoscopes and even white coats have all been shown to carry pathogenic organisms.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • French G.
        • Rayner D.
        • Branson M.
        • et al.
        Contamination of doctors' and nurses' pens with nosocomial pathogens.
        Lancet. 1998; 351: 213
        • Datz C.
        • Jungwirth A.
        • Dusch H.
        • et al.
        What's on doctors' ball point pens?.
        Lancet. 1824; 1997: 350