I like this paper, not because it provides enormous insight into how I will practice
in future but because it crystallises a deeply important idea which is very simple
and, in my view, long over due.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Publication history
Published online: January 17, 2007
Accepted:
October 30,
2006
Received:
August 22,
2006
Footnotes
☆This commentary should have been published at the same time as the article to which it refers. Please accept apologies on behalf of JPRAS.
Identification
Copyright
© 2006 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- A simple classification for standardisation of nomenclature in free flap outcomeJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic SurgeryVol. 59Issue 12
- PreviewThe numbers of free flap donor site as well as their indications are constantly increasing. Despite increasing popularity of microvascular reconstructive procedures, literature lacks clear and objective outcome criteria. This paper reports on a simple outcome classification that has become a routine part of the unit's large workload of microvascular outcome recording. The classification was formed through a retrospective analysis of 241 consecutive cases from 2000 to 2001 and is a five graded numerical classification.
- Full-Text
- Preview
