Research Article| Volume 60, ISSUE 2, P152-162, February 2007

Reconstructive surgery of the leprosy nose: a new approach

Published:September 18, 2006DOI:


      There has still been no reduction in the detection rate worldwide for leprosy, despite supervised multi-drug therapy. In time, leprosy can result in a severe saddle-nose deformity leading to functional problems, disfiguration and stigmatization. In severe cases, only the nasal skin tissue and the lower lateral cartilages are preserved. In such cases, the ideal would be to restore the cartilaginous skeleton but, by contrast with other causes of saddle-nose deformities, this is complicated by the quantity and the poor quality of the remaining nasal mucosa. Leprosy-related saddle-nose deformities are therefore challenging and difficult to reconstruct with the techniques that have been proposed in the past. In this study, 24 patients underwent rhinoplastic surgery involving the use of autogenous costal and/or auricular cartilage or composite grafts. The nasal septum, the upper laterals and the anterior nasal spine were reconstructed with a dorsal onlay attached to a columellar strut with an extension on the proximal side. Before surgery, the saddle-nose deformities were classified according to severity with a new system based on clinical symptoms and signs. Postoperative evaluation was performed at least two years after surgery (N=17). Functional and aesthetic improvement, resorption rate, warping, infection and extrusion were analysed. Functional and aesthetic improvements were achieved in 15/17 patients. None of the patients developed an infection and extrusion or warping of the implants was not observed. The resorption rate depended on the localization and the type of cartilage implant. In general, auricular conchal cartilage implant grafts resulted in less resorption than costal cartilage. Least resorption (4/17 patients) was observed in the dorsal onlay grafts of both conchal (1/6) and costal cartilage grafts (3/11). Resorption of columellar strut implants and shield grafts was observed in 7/17 patients. No resorption was seen of composite grafts (0/4) and alar battens (0/7). Autogenous cartilage implants can be used to reconstruct saddle-nose deformities in leprosy with a minimum risk of complications. The preoperative grade of severity was used as a basis for the development of guidelines for optimal long-term functional and aesthetic outcome.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Britton W.J.
        • Lockwood D.N.J.
        Lancet. 2004; 363: 1209-1219
        • Ridley D.S.
        • Jopling W.H.
        Classification of leprosy according to immunity. A five-group system.
        Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1966; 68: 255-273
        • Rees R.J.W.
        The impact of experimental human leprosy in the mouse on leprosy research.
        Int J Lepr. 1971; 39: 201-215
        • Das P.K.
        • Naafs B.
        Lepra: Aetiologie, pathogenese en epidemiologie.
        Import Dermatologie. Glaxo, Nieuwegein1995 (p. 31–36)
        • Huang C.L.
        The transmission of leprosy in man.
        Int J Lepr. 1980; 48: 309-318
        • Pedley J.C.
        The nasal mucus in leprosy.
        Lepr Rev. 1973; 44: 33-35
        • Fokkens W.J.
        • Nolst Trenité G.J.
        • Vinmond M.
        • et al.
        The nose in leprosy: immunohistology of the nasal mucosa.
        Int J Lepr. 1998; 66: 328-339
        • Stucker F.J.
        • Gage-white L.
        Survey of surgical implants.
        Facial Plast Surg. 1986; 3: 141-144
        • Beekhuis G.J.
        Polyamide mesh used in facial plastic surgery.
        Arch Otolaryngol. 1980; 106: 642-644
        • Sheen J.H.
        Secondary rhinoplasty.
        in: Mac Carthy J.G. Plastic surgery. The face, part II. vol. 3. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia1990: 1895-1923
        • Ortiz-Monasterio F.
        • Olmedo A.
        • Oscoy L.O.
        The use of cartilage grafts in primary aesthetic rhinoplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981; 67: 597-605
        • Powell N.B.
        • Riley R.W.
        Facial contouring with outer table calvarian bone.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989; 115: 1454-1458
        • Kridel R.W.J.
        • Kraus W.M.
        Grafts and implants in revision rhinoplasty.
        Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1995; 3: 473-486
        • Daniel R.K.
        Rhinoplasty and ribgrafts: evolving a flexible operating technique.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994; 94: 597-609
        • Colton J.J.
        • Beekhuis G.J.
        Use of mersilene in nasal augmentation.
        Facial Plast Surg Int Quart Monogr. 1992; 8: 149-156
        • Farina R.
        • Villano J.B.
        Follow-up of bone grafts to the nose.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971; 48: 251-255
        • Lovice D.B.
        • Mingrone M.D.
        • Toriumi D.M.
        Grafts and implants in rhinoplasty and nasal reconstruction.
        Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1999; 32: 113-141
        • Vuyk H.D.
        • Adamson P.A.
        Biomaterials in rhinoplasty.
        Clin Otolaryngol. 1998; 23: 209-217
        • Burget G.C.
        • Menick F.J.
        Nasal support and lining: the marriage of beauty and blood supply.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 84: 189-203
        • Deva A.K.
        • Merten S.
        • Chang L.
        Silicone in nasal augmentation rhinoplasty: a decade of clinical experience.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 102: 1230-1237
        • Mendelsohn M.
        • Dun lop G.
        Gore-tex® augmentation grafting in rhinoplasty: is it safe?.
        J Otolaryngol. 1998; 27: 337-341
        • Godin M.S.
        • Waldman S.R.
        • Johnson C.M.
        Nasal augmentation using gore-tex®: a 10-year experience.
        Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999; 1: 118-121
        • Schwarz R.J.
        • Macdonald M.
        A rational approach to nasal reconstruction in leprosy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114: 876-882
        • Riechelmann H.
        • Rettinger G.
        Three-step reconstruction of complex saddle nose deformities.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130: 334-338
        • Toriumi D.M.
        Grafts in rhinoplasty: autogenous grafts are worth the extra time.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 126: 562-564
        • Parker Porter J.
        Grafts in rhinoplasty: alloplastic vs autogenous.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 126: 558-561
        • Fl Tovey
        Reconstruction of the Nose in Leprosy patients.
        Lep Rev. 1965; 36: 215-220
        • Wintsch K.
        Nasenrekonstruktion unter Berücksichtigung der Lepra-Nase.
        Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1986; 18: 231-235
        • Antia N.H.
        • Pandya N.J.
        Surgical treatment of the nasal deformities of leprosy: a 16-year review.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977; 60: 768-777
        • Malaviya G.N.
        • Husain S.
        Surgical correction of saddle nose deformity in leprosy – one stage procedure.
        Acta Leprologica. 1994; 9: 76-82
        • Antia N.H.
        Reconstruction of the face in leprosy.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1963; 32: 71
        • Wyss T.
        New method of nose reconstruction.
        Lep Rev. 1964; 35: 47-49
        • Gunter J.P.
        • Clark C.P.
        • Friedman R.M.
        Internal stabilization of autogenous rib cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty: a barrier to cartilage warping.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100: 161-169