Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 60, ISSUE 1, P48-60, January 2007

Hypospadias and associated penile anomalies: a histopathological study and a reconstruction of the pathogenesis

Published:September 07, 2006DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2006.05.020

      Summary

      Hypospadias is considered to be the result of inadequate fusion of urethral folds and, possibly, of canalization of a glandar epithelial cord during the formation of the spongy urethra. This theory had to be reconsidered because a recent study in normal human embryos has exposed such fusion and invagination as misconceptions. Autopsy specimens of five penises with hypospadias from foetuses and neonates were studied histologically. The findings complemented with data from the literature were correlated to the normal developmental process to reconstruct the pathogenesis of the disorder. Histopathological analysis revealed that the hypospadic orifice was the proximal part of a mucosal delta which revealed the structure of the roof and meatus of a flattened distal urethra. Branches of the raphe bordering the delta and terminating in prominent ‘dog ears’ had the characteristics of the transient urethral labia (folds). Associated curvature and torsion could be related to structural abnormalities of vascular structures, notably the distal corpus spongiosum, and fasciae predominantly proximal to the hypospadic orifice. Correlation with normal development indicated that hypospadias and associated anomalies are not caused by disturbed fusion or glandar invagination but by maldevelopment of a complex of primordial fascial and vascular tissue proximal to the urethral orifice which normally form the venter side of the penis by disproportionately strong proliferation and make the urethral orifice shift distalward. Insufficient growth may disturb that shift with the degree of deficiency determining the precise position of the urethral orifice, size of the urethral delta and defect of the prepuce. Shortage and/or poor organisation of these tissues explain curvature and, if asymmetrical, torsion, both of which can occur also with minimal urethral deformity or as congenital ventral curvature and torsion without hypospadias.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Snodgrass W.
        • Patterson K.
        • Plaire J.C.
        • et al.
        Histology of the urethral plate: implications for hypospadias repair.
        J Urol. 2000; 164: 988-990
        • Stephens F.D.
        Embryogenesis of hypospadias.
        in: Stephens F.D. Smith E.D. Hutson J.M. Congenital anomalies of the urinary and genital tracts. Isis Medical Media, Oxford, United Kingdom1996: 80-90
      1. Van der Meulen JCHM. Hypospadias. Thesis Leiden [Stenfert Kroese 1964]. American edition: Springfield, Illinois, USA [Ch. Thomas 1964].

        • Avellán L.
        Morphology of hypospadias.
        Scand J Plast Surg. 1980; 14: 239-247
        • Sievers R.
        Anomalien am Penis. Ihre Beziehungen zur Hypospadie und ihre Deutung.
        Dtsch Z Chirurgie. 1926; 199: 286-306
        • Marshall M.
        • Beh W.P.
        • Johnson S.H.
        • et al.
        Etiologic considerations in penoscrotal hypospadias repair.
        J Urol. 1978; 120: 229-231
        • Smith D.R.
        Hypospadias: its anatomic and therapeutic considerations.
        J Int Coll Surg. 1955; 24: 64-71
        • Wettlaufer J.N.
        Cutaneous chordee. Fact and fancy.
        Urology. 1974; 4: 293-296
        • Kaplan G.W.
        • Brock W.A.
        The etiology of chordee.
        Urol Clin North Am. 1981; 8: 383-387
        • Page R.E.
        Hypospadias revisited.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1981; 34: 149-151
        • Williams D.I.
        The development and abnormalities of the penile urethra.
        Acta Anat. 1952; 15: 176-187
        • Avellán L.
        • Knuttson F.
        Microscopic studies of curvature-causing structures in hypospadias.
        Scan J Plast Surg. 1980; 14: 249-258
        • Paul M.
        • Kanagasuntheram R.
        The congenital anomalies of the lower urinary tract.
        Br J Urol. 1956; 28: 118-125
        • Rowsell A.R.
        • Morgan B.D.G.
        Hypospadias and the embryogenesis of the penile urethra.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1987; 40: 201-206
        • Baskin L.S.
        • Erol A.
        • Li Y.W.
        • et al.
        Anatomical studies of hypospadias.
        J Urol. 1998; 160: 1108-1115
        • Van der Putte S.C.J.
        The development of the perineum in the human.
        Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2005; 177: 1-135
        • Glenister T.W.
        The origin and fate of the urethral plate.
        J Anat (London). 1954; 88: 413-425
        • Devine C.J.
        Embryology of the male external genitalia.
        Clin Plast Surg. 1980; 7: 141-148
        • Larsen W.J.
        Human embryology.
        Churchill Livingstone, New York, Edinburgh, London, Melbourne, Tokyo2001 (p. 256–74)
        • Spiro A.S.
        • Seitzinger J.W.
        • Hanna M.K.
        Hypospadias with dorsal chordee.
        Urology. 1992; 39: 389-392
      2. Van der Werff JFA. The assessment of hypospadias. Thesis, Rotterdam 1999. p. 33–46.

        • Hynes P.J.
        • Fraher J.P.
        The development of the male genitourinary system: III. The formation of the spongiose and glandar urethra.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2004; 57: 203-214
        • Hatch D.A.
        • Maizels M.
        • Zaontz M.R.
        • et al.
        Hypospadias hidden by a complete prepuce.
        Surg Gyn Obstet. 1989; 169: 233-234
        • Bergerhof H.D.
        • Gelbke H.
        Hypospadismus sine hypospadia und Harnröhrenverkürzung (short urethra).
        Der Chirurg. 1962; 33: 114-118
        • Dickie W.R.
        • Sharpe C.
        Crypto-hypospadias – a review of 38 cases.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1973; 26: 227-234
        • Devine C.J.
        • Horton C.E.
        Chordee without hypospadias.
        J Urol. 1973; 110: 264-271
        • Daskalopoulos E.I.
        • Baskin L.
        • Duckett J.W.
        • et al.
        Congenital penile curvature (chordee without hypospadias).
        Urology. 1993; 42: 708-712
        • Cendron J.
        • Melin Y.
        Congenital curvature of the penis without hypospadias.
        Urol Clin North Am. 1981; 8: 389-395
        • Ebbehoj J.
        • Metz P.
        Congenital penile angulation.
        Br J Urol. 1987; 60: 264-266
        • Ben Ari J.
        • Merlob P.
        • Mimouni F.
        • et al.
        Characteristics of the male genitalia in the newborn: penis.
        J Urol. 1985; 134: 521-522