Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 60, ISSUE 6, P672-681, June 2007

Comparing conventional gauze therapy to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: A prospective randomised trial

  • C.M. Mouës
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Department of Surgery (Resident Plastic Surgery), P.O. Box 5011, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 15 2604867; fax: +31 15 2603599.
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Currently researcher at the Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
    G.J.C.M. van den Bemd
    Footnotes
    1 Currently researcher at the Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • F. Heule
    Affiliations
    Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • S.E.R. Hovius
    Affiliations
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Currently researcher at the Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

      Summary

      Background

      Vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy (vacuum therapy) has been used in our department since 1997 as a tool to bridge the period between debridement and definite surgical closure in full-thickness wounds. We performed a prospective randomised clinical trial to compare the efficacy of vacuum therapy to conventional moist gauze therapy in this stage of wound treatment.

      Methods

      Treatment efficacy was assessed by semi-quantitative scoring of the wound conditions (signs of rubor, calor, exudate and fibrinous slough) and by wound surface area measurements. Tissue biopsies were performed to quantify the bacterial load. Besides this, the duration until ‘ready for surgical therapy’ and complications encountered during therapy and postoperatively were recorded.

      Results

      Fifty-four patients were included (vacuum n=29, conventional n=25). With vacuum therapy, healthier wound conditions were observed. Furthermore, a tendency towards a shorter duration of therapy was found, which was most prominent in late-treated wounds. In addition, the wound surface area reduced significantly faster with vacuum therapy. Surprisingly, these results were obtained without a decrease in the number of bacteria colonising the wound. Complications were minor, except for one case of septicaemia and one case of increased tissue necrosis, which compelled us to stop vacuum therapy. For the treatment of full-thickness wounds, vacuum therapy has proven to be a valid wound healing modality.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Attinger C.E.
        • Bulan E.J.
        Debridement. The key initial first step in wound healing.
        Foot Ankle Clin. 2001; 6: 627-660
        • Schultz G.S.
        • Sibbald R.G.
        • Falanga V.
        • et al.
        Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management.
        Wound Repair Regen. 2003; 11: S1-S28
        • Redon H.
        La fermeture des plaies etendues sous depression.
        Presse Med. 1955; 63: 1034
        • Fleischmann W.
        • Strecker W.
        • Bombelli M.
        • et al.
        Vacuum sealing as treatment of soft tissue damage in open fractures.
        Unfallchirurg. 1993; 96: 488-492
        • Fleischmann W.
        • Lang E.
        • Russ M.
        Treatment of infection by vacuum sealing.
        Unfallchirurg. 1997; 100: 301-304
        • Fleischmann W.
        • Russ M.
        • Westhauser A.
        • et al.
        Vacuum sealing as carrier system for controlled local drug administration in wound infection.
        Unfallchirurg. 1998; 101: 649-654
        • Morykwas M.J.
        • Argenta L.C.
        • Shelton-Brown E.I.
        • et al.
        Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1997; 38: 553-562
        • Argenta L.C.
        • Morykwas M.J.
        Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1997; 38 ([discussion 577]): 563-576
        • Wu S.H.
        • Zecha P.J.
        • Feitz R.
        • et al.
        Vacuum therapy as an intermediate phase in wound closure: a clinical experience.
        Eur J Plast Surg. 2000; 23: 174-177
        • DeFranzo A.J.
        • Argenta L.C.
        • Marks M.W.
        • et al.
        The use of vacuum-assisted closure therapy for the treatment of lower-extremity wounds with exposed bone.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 108: 1184-1191
        • Garner G.B.
        • Ware D.N.
        • Cocanour C.S.
        • et al.
        Vacuum-assisted wound closure provides early fascial reapproximation in trauma patients with open abdomens.
        Am J Surg. 2001; 182: 630-638
        • Argenta P.A.
        • Rahaman J.
        • Gretz 3rd, H.F.
        • et al.
        Vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of complex gynecologic wound failures.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99: 497-501
        • Song D.H.
        • Wu L.C.
        • Lohman R.F.
        • et al.
        Vacuum assisted closure for the treatment of sternal wounds: the bridge between debridement and definitive closure.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111: 92-97
        • Pinocy J.
        • Albes J.M.
        • Wicke C.
        • et al.
        Treatment of periprosthetic soft tissue infection of the groin following vascular surgical procedures by means of a polyvinyl alcohol-vacuum sponge system.
        Wound Repair Regen. 2003; 11: 104-109
        • Evans D.
        • Land L.
        Topical negative pressure for treating chronic wounds: a systematic review.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2001; 54: 238-242
        • Joseph E.
        • Hamori C.A.
        • Bergman S.B.
        • et al.
        A prospective randomized trial of vacuum assisted closure versus standard therapy of chronic nonhealing wounds.
        Wounds. 2000; 12: 60-67
        • McCallon S.K.
        • Knight C.A.
        • Valiulus J.P.
        • et al.
        Vacuum-assisted closure versus saline-moistened gauze in the healing of postoperative diabetic foot wounds.
        Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000; 46: 28-34
        • Ford C.N.
        • Reinhard E.R.
        • Yeh D.
        • et al.
        Interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure versus the healthpoint system in the management of pressure ulcers.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2002; 49: 55-61
        • Eginton M.T.
        • Brown K.R.
        • Seabrook G.R.
        • et al.
        A prospective randomized evaluation of negative-pressure wound dressings for diabetic foot wounds.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 2003; 17: 645-649
        • Wanner M.B.
        • Schwarzl F.
        • Strub B.
        • et al.
        Vacuum-assisted wound closure for cheaper and more comfortable healing of pressure sores: a prospective study.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003; 37: 28-33
        • Etris M.B.
        • Pribble J.
        • LaBrecque J.
        Evaluation of two wound measurement methods in a multi-center, controlled study.
        Ostomy Wound Manage. 1994; 40: 44-48
        • Miller Q.
        • Bird E.
        • Bird K.
        • et al.
        Effect of subatmospheric pressure on the acute healing wound.
        Curr Surg. 2004; 61: 205-208
        • Shah M.
        • Mohanraj M.
        High levels of fusidic acid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in dermatology patients.
        Br J Dermatol. 2003; 148: 1018-1020
        • Filius P.M.
        • Gyssens I.C.
        Impact of increasing antimicrobial resistance on wound management.
        Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002; 3: 1-7
        • Lineaweaver W.
        • Howard R.
        • Soucy D.
        • et al.
        Topical antimicrobial toxicity.
        Arch Surg. 1985; 120: 267-270
        • Lineaweaver W.
        • McMorris S.
        • Soucy D.
        • et al.
        Cellular and bacterial toxicities of topical antimicrobials.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985; 75: 394-396
        • Hidalgo E.
        • Bartolome R.
        • Dominguez C.
        Cytotoxicity mechanisms of sodium hypochlorite in cultured human dermal fibroblasts and its bactericidal effectiveness.
        Chem Biol Interact. 2002; 139: 265-282
        • Moues C.M.
        • van den Bemd G.J.
        • Meerding W.J.
        • et al.
        An economic evaluation of the use of TNP on full thickness wounds.
        J Wound Care. 2005; 14: 224-227
        • Krasner D.L.
        Managing wound pain in patients with vacuum-assisted closure devices.
        Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002; 48: 38-43
        • Lange de M.Y.
        • Schasfoort R.A.
        • Obdeijn M.C.
        • et al.
        Vacuum-assisted closure: indications and clinical experience.
        Eur J Plast Surg. 2000; 23: 178-182
        • Bowler P.G.
        The 10(5) bacterial growth guideline: reassessing its clinical relevance in wound healing.
        Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003; 49: 44-53
        • Thomson P.D.
        • Smith Jr., D.J.
        What is infection?.
        Am J Surg. 1994; 167 ([discussion 10S–11S]): 7S-10S
        • Robson M.C.
        • Heggers J.P.
        Bacterial quantification of open wounds.
        Mil Med. 1969; 134: 19-24
        • Robson M.C.
        • Lea C.E.
        • Dalton J.B.
        • et al.
        Quantitative bacteriology and delayed wound closure.
        Surg Forum. 1968; 19: 501-502
        • Heller W.A.
        • Gottlieb L.J.
        • Zachary L.S.
        • et al.
        The use of quantitative bacteriologic assessment of bone.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100: 397-401
        • Breidenbach W.C.
        • Trager S.
        Quantitative culture technique and infection in complex wounds of the extremities closed with free flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995; 95: 860-865
        • Isago T.
        • Nozaki M.
        • Kikuchi Y.
        • et al.
        Negative-pressure dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
        J Dermatol. 2003; 30: 299-305
        • Weed T.
        • Ratliff C.
        • Drake D.B.
        Quantifying bacterial bioburden during negative pressure wound therapy: does the wound VAC enhance bacterial clearance?.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2004; 52: 276-279
        • Moues C.M.
        • Vos M.C.
        • van den Bemd G.J.
        • et al.
        Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial.
        Wound Repair Regen. 2004; 12: 11-17
        • Clare M.P.
        • Fitzgibbons T.C.
        • McMullen S.T.
        • et al.
        Experience with the vacuum assisted closure negative pressure technique in the treatment of non-healing diabetic and dysvascular wounds.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2002; 23: 896-901
        • Jukema G.N.
        • Menon A.G.
        • Bernards A.T.
        • et al.
        Amputation-sparing treatment by nature: “surgical” maggots revisited.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2002; 35: 1566-1571