Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 60, ISSUE 5, P543-555, May 2007

Macroporous gelatine spheres as culture substrate, transplantation vehicle, and biodegradable scaffold for guided regeneration of soft tissues. In vivo study in nude mice

  • Fredrik R.M. Huss
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Department of Hand-, Plastic-, and Burn Surgery, University Hospital of Linköping, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden. Tel.: +46 13 222000; fax: +46 13 223705.
    Affiliations
    Laboratory for Experimental Plastic Surgery, Institute of Biomedicine and Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköpings universitet, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden
    Search for articles by this author
  • Johan P.E. Junker
    Affiliations
    Laboratory for Experimental Plastic Surgery, Institute of Biomedicine and Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköpings universitet, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden
    Search for articles by this author
  • Hans Johnson
    Affiliations
    Laboratory for Experimental Plastic Surgery, Institute of Biomedicine and Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköpings universitet, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden
    Search for articles by this author
  • Gunnar Kratz
    Affiliations
    Laboratory for Experimental Plastic Surgery, Institute of Biomedicine and Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköpings universitet, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden
    Search for articles by this author

      Summary

      In the course of development of a new type of filler for the correction of small defects in soft tissues we studied macroporous gelatine spheres as culture substrate, transplantation vehicle, and biodegradable scaffold for guided regeneration of soft tissues in vivo. We injected intradermally in nude mice gelatine spheres that had either been preseeded with human fibroblasts or preadipocytes, or left unseeded. We compared the extent of regenerated tissue with that found after injections of saline or single-cell suspensions of human fibroblasts or preadipocytes. Routine histological examinations and immunohistochemical staining for von Willebrand factor (indicating neoangiogenesis) were made after 7, 21, and 56 days. Injected saline or single-cell suspensions had no effect. However, a quick and thorough tissue regeneration with developing neoangiogenesis was elicited by the gelatine spheres and the effect of spheres preseeded with preadipocytes surpassed the effect of spheres preseeded with fibroblasts, which in turn surpassed the effect of unseeded gelatine spheres. We suggest that minor soft tissue defects such as wrinkles or creases can be corrected by injection of naked macroporous gelatine spheres, whereas larger defects are best corrected by injection of macroporous gelatine spheres preseeded with fibroblasts, or preadipocytes, or both.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kononas T.C.
        • Bucky L.P.
        • Hurley C.
        • et al.
        The fate of suctioned and surgically removed fat after reimplantation for soft-tissue augmentation: a volumetric and histologic study in the rabbit.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 91: 763-768
        • Niechajev I.
        • Sevcuk O.
        Long-term results of fat transplantation: clinical and histological studies.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994; 94: 496-506
        • Saray A.
        Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for facial contour augmentation: preliminary report.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003; 27: 368-375
        • Fagien S.
        Facial soft-tissue augmentation with injectable autologous and allogenic human tissue collagen matrix (Autologen and Dermalogen).
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 362-373
        • Coleman S.R.
        Facial recontouring with lipostructure.
        Clin Plast Surg. 1997; 24: 347-367
        • Watson D.
        • Keller G.S.
        • Lacombe V.
        • et al.
        Autologous fibroblasts for treatment of rhytids and dermal depressions – a pilot study.
        Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999; 1: 165-170
        • Lemperle G.
        • Morhenn V.
        • Charrier U.
        Human histology and persistence of various injectable filler substances for soft tissue augmentation.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003; 27: 354-366
        • Kimura Y.
        • Ozeki M.
        • Inamoto T.
        • et al.
        Adipose tissue engineering based on human preadipocytes combined with gelatine microspheres containing basic fibroblast growth factor.
        Biomaterials. 2003; 24: 2513-2521
        • Liu J.Y.
        • Hafner J.
        • Dragieva G.
        • et al.
        Autologous cultured keratinocytes on porcine gelatine microbeads effectively heal chronic venous leg ulcers.
        Wound Repair Regen. 2004; 12: 148-156
        • von Heimburg D.
        • Zachariah S.
        • Low A.
        • et al.
        Influence of different biodegradable carriers on the in vivo behavior of human adipose precursor cells.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 108: 411-420
        • van Wezel A.L.
        Growth of cell-strains and primary cells on micro-carriers in homogeneous culture.
        Nature. 1967; 216: 64-65
        • Levine D.W.
        • Wang D.I.C.
        • Thilly W.G.
        Optimization of growth surface parameters in microcarrier cell culture.
        Biotechnol Bioeng. 1979; 21: 821-845
        • Johansson A.
        • Nielsen V.
        Biosilon a new microcarrier.
        Dev Biol Stand. 1980; 46: 125-129
        • Nilsson K.
        • Mosbach K.
        Preparation of immobilized animal cells.
        FEBS Lett. 1980; 118: 145-150
        • Reuveny S.
        • Mizrahi A.
        • Kotler M.
        • et al.
        Factors affecting cell attachment, spreading and growth on derivatized microcarriers. I. Establishment of working system and effect of the type of the amino-charged groups.
        Biotechnol Bioeng. 1983; 25: 469-480
        • Nilsson K.
        • Buzsaky F.
        • Mosbach K.
        Growth of anchorage-dependent cells on macroporous microcarriers.
        Bio/Technology. 1986; 4: 989-990
        • Malda J.
        • Kreijveld E.
        • Temenoff J.S.
        • et al.
        Expansion of human nasal chondrocytes on macroporous microcarriers enhances redifferentiation.
        Biomaterials. 2003; 24: 5153-5161
        • Hamid M.
        • McCluskey J.T.
        • McClenaghan N.H.
        • et al.
        Culture and function of electrofusion-derived clonal insulin-secreting cells immobilized on solid and macroporous microcarrier beads.
        Biosci Rep. 2000; 20: 167-176
        • Del Guerra S.
        • Bracci C.
        • Nilsson K.
        • et al.
        Entrapment of dispersed pancreatic islet cells in CultiSpher-S macroporous gelatine microcarriers: preparation in vitro characterization, microencapsulation.
        Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001; 75: 741-744
        • Voigt M.
        • Schauer M.
        • Schaeffer D.J.
        • et al.
        Cultured epidermal keratinocytes on a microspherical transport system are feasible to re-constitute the epidermis in full-thickness wounds.
        Tissue Eng. 1999; 5: 563-572
        • Entenmann G.
        • Hauner H.
        Relationship between replication and differentiation in cultured human adipocyte precursor cells.
        Am J Physiol. 1996; 270: C1011-C1016
        • de Cássia Novaes W.
        • Berg A.
        Experiences with a new biodegradable hydrogel (Aquamid): a pilot study.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003; 27: 376-380
        • Drury J.L.
        • Mooney D.J.
        Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications.
        Biomaterials. 2003; 24: 4337-4351
        • Bensaïd W.
        • Trifitt J.T.
        • Blanchat C.
        • et al.
        A biodegradable fibrin scaffold for mesenchymal stem cell transplantation.
        Biomaterials. 2003; 24: 2497-2502