Advertisement
Case Report| Volume 60, ISSUE 2, P205-209, February 2007

Successful separation of pygopagus conjoined twins and primary skin closure using V-shaped flaps

Published:March 13, 2006DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2006.01.009

      Summary

      Pygopagus conjoined twins were born by caesarean section at 34 weeks of gestation. Initial evaluation revealed no other abnormalities apart from their attachment at lower back, buttocks and perineum. They had two separate anal and urogenital openings. Their investigations included roentgenograms, ultrasound, barium enema, cystourethrogram, CT scan and MRI. There were two separate spinal columns fused distally at the lower sacral level. Lower gastrointestinal studies showed two separate rectums and cystourethrogram showed normal and separate urinary tracts. MRI showed a single dural sac between two fused sacral bones with no other vertebral anomalies. They were successfully separated with primary skin closure using V-shaped flaps.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Spitz L.
        • Kiely E.M.
        Experience in the management of conjoined twins.
        Br J Surg. 2000; 89: 1188-1192
        • McDowell B.C.
        • Morton B.E.
        • Janik J.S.
        • et al.
        Separation of conjoined pygopagus twins.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111: 1998-2002
        • Janik J.S.
        • Hendrickson R.J.
        • Janik J.P.
        • et al.
        Spectrum of anorectal anomalies in pygopagus twins.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2003; 38: 608-612
        • Spiegel D.A.
        • Ganley T.J.
        • Akbarnia H.
        • et al.
        Congenital vertebral anomalies in ischiopagus and pygopagus conjoined twins.
        Clin Orthop. 2000; 381: 137-144
        • Fieggen A.G.
        • Millar A.J.W.
        • Rode H.
        • et al.
        Spinal cord involvement in pygopagus conjoined twins: case report and review of the literature.
        Childs Nerv Syst. 2003; 19: 183-187
        • Hilfiker M.L.
        • Hart M.
        • Holmes R.
        Expansion and division of conjoined twins.
        J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33: 768-770
        • Zuker R.M.
        • Filler R.M.
        • Lalla R.
        Intra-abdominal tissue expansion: an adjunct in the separation of conjoined twins.
        J Pediatr Surg. 1986; 21: 1198-1200
        • Canty T.G.
        • Mainwaring Sr., R.
        • Vecchione T.
        Separation of omphalopagus twins: unique reconstruction using syngeneic cryopreserved tissue.
        J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33: 750-753
        • Cywes S.
        • Millar A.J.
        • Rode H.
        • Brown R.A.
        Conjoined twins—the Cape Town experience.
        Pediatr Surg Int. 1997; 12: 234-248
        • Spencer R.
        Anatomic description of conjoined twins: a plea for standardized terminology.
        J Pediatr Surg. 1996; 31: 941-944
        • Spencer R.
        Conjoined twins; theoretical embryologic basis.
        Teratology. 1992; 45: 591-602
        • Schmidt W.
        • Hebarling D.
        • Kubli F.
        Antepartum ultrasonographic diagnosis of conjoined twins in early pregnancy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 139: 961-963
        • Votteler T.P.
        Conjoined twins.
        in: Welch K.J. Randolph J.G. Ravitch M.M. Neill J.A.O. Rowe M.I. Pediatric Surgery. 4th ed. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago1986: 829-836
        • Hoyle R.M.
        Surgical separation of conjoined twins.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990; 170: 540-562