Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 56, ISSUE 8, P812-814, December 2003

Manoeuvring a-head in plastic surgery

      Abstract

      Surgical training has undergone a rapid transformation over the last decade. One outcome of these changes is the interest that has been generated in the possibility of training surgical skills outside the operating theatre. We describe a cost-effective tool that may be used to improve surgical handling and improve surgical concepts in facial plastic surgery.

      Keywords

      Surgeons are traditionally taught to operate using a Halstedian apprenticeship model.
      • Haluck R.S.
      • Krummel T.M.
      Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century.
      The shortening and restructuring of resident training, however, limits the time for ‘hands on’ surgical experience.
      • Torkington J.
      • Smith S.G.
      • Rees B.I.
      • Darzi A.
      The role of simulation in surgical training.
      Surgical trainees are encouraged to learn surgical skills outside the operating room with increasing interest in the use of surgical simulators.
      • Steele R.J.
      • Logie J.R.
      • Munro A.
      Technical training in surgery: the trainee's view.
      The skills obtained from these simulators may then be transferred to the operative environment. Although simulation models require further validation before they can be used as an assessment tool for means of appraisal and revalidation, their use in teaching and training is increasingly being realised. We have developed a cost-effective surgical simulator model for teaching and training facial plastic surgeons.

      1. Methods

      We have used a mannequin head and covered it with a chamois cloth. The chamois cloth can be pinned in position to cover the mannequin, stimulating the skin on the face (Fig. 1, Fig. 2) . This model costs less than £5. Skin lesions may be marked and trainees asked to discuss the surgical options and margins for a variety of different pathologies. In Fig. 3 the surgical excision margins for a basal cell carcinoma (BCC) have been drawn around the lesion. Local flaps may be discussed and trainees allowed to practice using their design (Fig. 3, Fig. 4) . The careful use of a water spray allows the chamois leather to stretch.
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Fig. 1Equipment required to construct the surgical model.
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Fig. 2The chamois leather has been pinned onto the mannequin head.
      Figure thumbnail gr3
      Fig. 3A BCC has been marked in black with a suitable margin and a local flap designed to cover the defect.
      Figure thumbnail gr4
      Fig. 4The BCC has been excised and the local flap has successfully been used to cover the defect.
      Scars may be marked on the face and the trainee asked to mark a suitable means of revising the scar, allowing suitable training and understanding of Z plasty design.

      2. Discussion

      Surgeons are assessed while they are training for their knowledge, decision-making and dexterity. Simulators may provide training in all these areas providing many advantages. Training and practice can take place in an environment free of significant risk to other trainee or patient. Its activity can be replicated as many times as necessary and practice can be interrupted when necessary and recommenced as appropriate. The degree of difficulty can be readily adjusted to meet the individual learner's needs and opportunities are always available for practice, without having to wait for an appropriate case. Reliable feedback can be provided for the instructor and student instantaneously and it removes the ethical dilemmas associated with other forms of surgical training.
      • O'Toole R.V.
      • Playter R.R.
      • Krummel T.M.
      • et al.
      Measuring and developing suturing technique with a virtual reality surgical simulator.
      Many simulators have been described in a wide variety of specialities.
      • O'Toole R.V.
      • Playter R.R.
      • Krummel T.M.
      • et al.
      Measuring and developing suturing technique with a virtual reality surgical simulator.
      • Lannon D.A.
      • Atkins J.A.
      • Butler P.E.
      Non-vital, prosthetic, and virtual reality models of microsurgical training.
      • Southern S.J.
      • Ramakrishnan V.
      Dexter: a device for the assessment of microsurgical instrumentation and instruction of trainees.
      • Vanchieri C.
      Virtual reality: will practice make perfect?.
      • Lamade W.
      • Glombitza G.
      • Fischer L.
      • et al.
      The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery.
      • Taffinder N.J.
      • McManus I.C.
      • Gul Y.
      • Russell R.C.
      • Darzi A.
      Effect of sleep deprivation on surgeons' dexterity on laparoscopy simulator.
      • Brown J.
      • Montgomary K.
      • Latombe J.-C.
      • Stephanides M.
      Their increasing role and development in plastic surgery
      • Southern S.J.
      • Ramakrishnan V.
      Dexter: a device for the assessment of microsurgical instrumentation and instruction of trainees.
      • Wilson P.A.
      • Rhodes N.D.
      • Southern S.J.
      Surgical simulation in plastic surgery.
      • Rhodes N.D.
      • Wilson P.A.
      • Southern S.J.
      The flexor-tendon repair simulator.
      • Villafane O.
      • Southern S.J.
      • Foo I.T.
      Simulated interactive local flaps: operating room models for surgeon and patient alike.
      • Watt D.A.
      • Majumder S.
      • Southern S.J.
      Simulating split-skin graft harvest.
      • Senior M.A.
      • Southern S.J.
      • Majumder S.
      Microvascular simulator—a device for micro-anastomosis training.
      • Guler M.M.
      • Rao G.S.
      Canniesburn ever-ready model to practise microsurgery.
      • Beale R.
      • Dachtler J.D.
      • Rhodes N.
      • Southern S.J.
      Use of a scar simulator to aid patients' understanding of postoperative scar outcome.
      is becoming apparent and this model allows a cost-effective means of teaching and training individuals in the role of facial plastic surgery.

      References

        • Haluck R.S.
        • Krummel T.M.
        Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century.
        Arch Surg. 2000; 135: 786-792
        • Torkington J.
        • Smith S.G.
        • Rees B.I.
        • Darzi A.
        The role of simulation in surgical training.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000; 82: 88-94
        • Steele R.J.
        • Logie J.R.
        • Munro A.
        Technical training in surgery: the trainee's view.
        Br J Surg. 1989; 76: 1291-1293
        • O'Toole R.V.
        • Playter R.R.
        • Krummel T.M.
        • et al.
        Measuring and developing suturing technique with a virtual reality surgical simulator.
        J Am Coll Surg. 1999; 189: 114-127
        • Lannon D.A.
        • Atkins J.A.
        • Butler P.E.
        Non-vital, prosthetic, and virtual reality models of microsurgical training.
        Microsurgery. 2001; 21: 389-393
        • Southern S.J.
        • Ramakrishnan V.
        Dexter: a device for the assessment of microsurgical instrumentation and instruction of trainees.
        Microsurgery. 1998; 18: 430-431
        • Vanchieri C.
        Virtual reality: will practice make perfect?.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999; 91: 207-209
        • Lamade W.
        • Glombitza G.
        • Fischer L.
        • et al.
        The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery.
        Arch Surg. 2000; 135: 1256-1261
        • Taffinder N.J.
        • McManus I.C.
        • Gul Y.
        • Russell R.C.
        • Darzi A.
        Effect of sleep deprivation on surgeons' dexterity on laparoscopy simulator.
        Lancet. 1998; 352: 1191
        • Brown J.
        • Montgomary K.
        • Latombe J.-C.
        • Stephanides M.
        A microsurgery simulation system. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2001. 2001 (pp. 137–144)
        • Wilson P.A.
        • Rhodes N.D.
        • Southern S.J.
        Surgical simulation in plastic surgery.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2001; 54: 560-561
        • Rhodes N.D.
        • Wilson P.A.
        • Southern S.J.
        The flexor-tendon repair simulator.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2001; 54: 373-374
        • Villafane O.
        • Southern S.J.
        • Foo I.T.
        Simulated interactive local flaps: operating room models for surgeon and patient alike.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1999; 52: 241
        • Watt D.A.
        • Majumder S.
        • Southern S.J.
        Simulating split-skin graft harvest.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1999; 52: 329
        • Senior M.A.
        • Southern S.J.
        • Majumder S.
        Microvascular simulator—a device for micro-anastomosis training.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001; 83: 358-360
        • Guler M.M.
        • Rao G.S.
        Canniesburn ever-ready model to practise microsurgery.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1990; 43: 381-382
        • Beale R.
        • Dachtler J.D.
        • Rhodes N.
        • Southern S.J.
        Use of a scar simulator to aid patients' understanding of postoperative scar outcome.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2002; 55: 458-459