Comparing DuoDERM E^R with scarlet red in the treatment of split skin graft donor sites

Reference

1. • Alvarez O.M.
   • Mertz P.M.
   • Eaglstein W.H.
   The effect of occlusive dressings on collagen synthesis and reepithelialisation in superficial wounds.
   Journal of Surgical Research. 1983; 35: 142
   • Google Scholar
2. • Blitz H.
   • Keissling M.
   • Kreysel H.W.
   Comparison of hydrocolloid dressing and saline gauze in the treatment of split skin graft donor sites. An environment for healing: the role of occlusion.
   in: Royal Society of Medicine International Congress and Symposium Series, No. 88. Royal Society of Medicine, London1985: 125
   • Google Scholar
3. • Champsauar A.
   • Amanon R.
   • Nefzi A.
   • Marichy J.
   Use of DuoDERm on skin graft donor sites: comparative study with tulle gras.
   Annales de Chirurgie Plastique et Esthetique. 1986; 31: 273
   • Google Scholar
4. • Forage A.V.
   The effects of removing the epidermis from burnt skin.
   The Lancet. 1962; 2: 690
   • Google Scholar
5. • Greenburg G.B.
   • Hunt T.K.
   The proliferative response in-vitro of vascular endothelial cells exposed to wound fluids and macrophages.
   Journal of Cell Physiology. 1978; 97: 355
   • Google Scholar
6. • Hinman C.D.
   • Maibach H.
   Effect of air exposure and occlusion on experimental human skin wounds.
   Nature. 1963; 200: 377
   • Google Scholar
7. • Hutchinson J.J.
   Prevalence of wound infection under occlusive dressings: a collective study of reported research.
   Wounds. 1989; 1: 123
   • Google Scholar
8. • Knighton D.R.
   • Silver I.A.
   • Hunt T.K.
   Regulation of wound angiogenesis — effect of oxygen gradients and inspired oxygen concentration.
   Surgery. 1981; 90: 262
   • Google Scholar
9. • McGregor I.A.
   Fundamental Techniques of Plastic Surgery and their Surgical Applications.
   in: 8th Ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh1989: 49
   • Google Scholar
10. • Madden M.R.
    • Nolan E.
    • Finkelstein J.L.
    • Yurt R.W.
    • Smeland J.
    • Goodwin C.W.
    • Hefton J.
    • Staino-Coico L.
    Comparison of an occlusive and a semi-occlusive dressing and the effect of wound exudate upon keratinocyte proliferation.
    Journal of Trauma. 1989; 29: 924
    • Google Scholar
11. • Salomon J.C.
    • Diegelmann R.F.
    • Cohen I.K.
    Effect of dressing on donor site epithelialisation.
    in: Surgical Forum. 25. 1974: 516
    • Google Scholar
12. • Turner T.D.
    Semiocclusive and occlusive dressings. An environment of healing: the role of occlusion.
    in: Royal Society of Medicine International Congress and Symposium Series. No. 88. Royal Society of Medicine, London1985: 5
    • Google Scholar
13. • Winter G.D.
    Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelialisation of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig.
    Nature. 1962; 193: 293
    • Google Scholar