Is the sleeve anastomosis a risky technique?

Reference

1. • Hyland W.T.
   • Botens S.R.
   • Minasi J.S.
   A reappraisal and modification of the Lauritzen technique of microvascular anastomoses.
   British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 1981; 34: 451
   • Google Scholar
2. • Krag C.
   • Holck S.
   Microvascular anastomoses: a comparison of the end-to-end and the telescoped technique in rats.
   Journal of Microsurgery. 1980; 2: 3
   • Google Scholar
3. • Krag C.
   • De Rose G.
   • Lyczakowski T.
   • Freeman C.
   The telescoped arterial microanastomosis for free flaps anastomosed to irradiated recipient vessels. An experimental study in rabbits.
   International Journal of Microsurgery. 1981; 3: 281
   • Google Scholar
4. • Krag C.
   • Holck S.
   • De Rose G.
   • Lyczakowski T.
   • Freeman C.
   Healing of microvascular anastomoses. A comparative study using normal and irradiated recipient vessels for experimental free flaps in rabbits.
   Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1982; 16: 267
   • Google Scholar
5. • Lauritzen C.
   A new and easier way to anastomose microvessels. An experimental study in rats.
   Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1978; 12: 291
   • Google Scholar
6. • Lauritzen C.
   Sleeve anastomosis.
   Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1983; 72 (Letter): 424
   • Google Scholar
7. • Lauritzen C.
   • Bagge U.
   A technical and biomechanical comparison between two types of microvascular anastomosis. An experimental study in rats.
   Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1979; 13: 417
   • Google Scholar
8. • Lauritzen C.
   • Hansson H.
   Microvascular repair after the sleeve anastomosis. An ultrastructural study in the rat femoral vessels.
   Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1980; 14: 65
   • Google Scholar
9. • Lauritzen C.
   • Johansson B.
   • Eriksson E.
   Long-term study of the microvascular sleeve anastomosis. An experimental study in the rabbit renal artery.
   Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1980; 14: 165
   • Google Scholar
10. • Nakayama Y.
    • Soeda S.
    Sleeve anastomosis evaluated by means of resin cast.
    Japanese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1981; 24: 342
    • Google Scholar
11. • Nakayama Y.
    • Soeda S.
    Sleeve anastomosis evaluated by means of electro-magnetic flow meter.
    Japanese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1984; 27: 525
    • Google Scholar
12. • Nakayama Y.
    • Soeda S.
    • Iino T.
    A radial forearm flap based on an extended dissection of the cephalic vein. The longest venous pedicle? Case report.
    British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 1986; 39: 454
    • Google Scholar
13. • Nakayama Y.
    • Soeda S.
    • Ogawa Y.
    Arterio-venous shunting by sleeve anastomosis.
    Japanese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1981; 24: 242
    • Google Scholar
14. • Sully L.
    • Nightingale M.
    • O'Brien B.
    • Hurley J.
    An experimental study of the sleeve technique in microarterial anastomoses.
    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1982; 70: 186
    • Google Scholar
15. • Wieslander J.B.
    • Aberg M.
    Blood flow in small arteries after end-to-end and end-in-end anastomoses: an experimental quantitative comparison.
    Journal of Microsurgery. 1980; 2: 121
    • Google Scholar
16. • Wieslander J.B.
    • Neckleburg C.V.
    • Aberg M.
    Endothelialization following end-to-end anastomoses.
    Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1984; 18: 193
    • Google Scholar
17. • Wieslander J.B.
    • Rausing A.
    A histologic comparison of experimental microarterial end-in-end (sleeve) and end-to-end anastomoses.
    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1984; 73: 279
    • Google Scholar