Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 40, ISSUE 4, P384-390, July 1987

A study of the long term results achieved by the Gillies Fry procedure

  • J.D. Walter
    Correspondence
    Requests for reprints to: Dr J. D. Walter, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Floor 20 Guy's Tower, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT.
    Affiliations
    Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals and the Department of Speech Therapy, Guy's Hospital, London ,UK
    Search for articles by this author
  • V. Hale
    Affiliations
    Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals and the Department of Speech Therapy, Guy's Hospital, London ,UK
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Renewed interest in delayed closure for cleft palate subjects revealed that no evaluation had been undertaken of patients who underwent the original Gillies Fry procedure. In the present investigation, 10 subjects operated upon prior to 1948 according to the Gillies Fry recommendations were evaluated for facial development, occlusal relationship, speech performance and velopharyngeal seal. Comparison of the cephalometric findings with accepted norms and examination of study casts gave encouraging results for facial and occlusal development. Speech quality covered a wide range of attainment, the best being rated highly. Endoscopic examination demonstrated regular velopharyngeal seal during swallowing but only one subject who regularly achieved velopharyngeal seal in speech. It was concluded that, although some claims for the procedure may have been a little enthusiastic, advantages accrued from it which were not accorded by other surgical approaches of the time, particularly so far as facial development and occlusion were concerned.

      Reference

        • Ballard C.F.
        Morphology and treatment of class 2 division 2 occlusions.
        Transactions of the European Orthodontic Society. 1956; 44
        • Bennett J.P.
        Sandwich pushback and lateral pharyngoplasty.
        British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 1973; 26: 16
        • Bishara S.E.
        • de Arrendando R.S.M.
        • Vales H.P.
        • Jakobsen J.R.
        Dentofacial relationships in persons with unoperated clefts: comparison between 3 cleft types.
        American Journal of Orthodontics. 1985; 87: 487
        • Broadbent B.H.
        • Broadbent B.H.
        Bolton Standards of Dentofacial Developmental Growth.
        C. V. Mosby Co., St. Louis1975
        • Foster T.D.
        Edwards M. Watson A.C.H. Advances in the Management of Cleft Palate. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh1980 (chap. 7)
        • Foster T.D.
        Edwards M. Watson A.C.H. Advances in the Management of Cleft Palate. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh1980 (chap. 13)
        • Fry W.K.
        The dental aspect of the treatment of congenital cleft palates.
        in: Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 14. 1921: 57
        • Fry W.K.
        The treatment of cleft palate.
        Lancet. 1924; 2: 1081
        • Gillies H.D.
        • Fry W.K.
        A new principle in the surgical treatment of congenital cleft palate and its mechanical counterpart.
        British Medical Journal. 1921; 1: 335
        • Hayashi I.
        • Saduka M.
        • Takimito K.
        • Miyazaki T.
        Craniofacial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip palate: a roentgeno-cephalometric study.
        Cleft Palate Journal. 1976; 13: 215
        • Krogman W.M.
        • Mazaheri M.
        • Harding R.L.
        • Ishiguro K.
        • Bariana G.
        • Meier J.
        • Carter H.
        • Ross P.
        A longitudinal study of morphological craniofacial patterns via P.A. X-ray head films in cleft patients from birth to 6 years of age.
        Cleft Palate Journal. 1975; 12: 59
        • Moore F.T.
        A new operation to cure nasopharyngeal incompetence.
        British Journal of Surgery. 1960; 47: 424
        • Pigott R.W.
        • Makepeace A.P.W.
        The technique of recording nasal pharyngoscopy.
        British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 1975; 28: 26
        • Poupard B.
        • Coorneart H.
        • Debaere P.A.
        • Treanton A.M.
        Cleft lip and cleft palate: can the hard palate be left open? A study of 62 cases with a follow up of 6 years or more.
        Annales de Chirurgie Plastique et Esthe´tique. 1983; 28: 325
        • Ricketts R.M.
        Present status of knowledge concerning the cleft palate child.
        Angle Orthodontist. 1956; 26: 10
        • Witzel M.A.
        • Salyer K.E.
        • Ross R.B.
        Delayed hard palate closure: the philosophy revisited.
        Cleft Palate Journal. 1984; 21: 263