Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 2 , Pages 234-239, February 2011

Diagnosis and localisation of flexor tendon injuries by surgeon-performed ultrasound: A cadaveric study

  • Dino J. Ravnic

      Affiliations

    • Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 232, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
  • ,
  • Robert D. Galiano

      Affiliations

    • Department of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
  • ,
  • Venkata Bodavula

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Centre, New York, NY 10016, USA
  • ,
  • David W. Friedman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL 33331, USA
  • ,
  • Roberto L. Flores

      Affiliations

    • Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 232, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 317 278 3667; fax: +1 317 278 4600.

Received 30 December 2009; accepted 23 April 2010. published online 14 July 2010.

Summary 

Background

Flexor tendon injuries are common problems faced by hand surgeons. To minimise the surgical trauma associated with localisation and retrieval of the proximal tendon end, we investigated the use of surgeon-performed ultrasound in the evaluation of injured flexor tendons in a cadaver model. Our goal was to use surgeon-performed ultrasound: (1) to correctly diagnose flexor tendon injuries and (2) to correctly localise the proximal tendon ends within 1cm.

Methods

Flexor tendon injuries with varying degrees of retraction were randomly created in individual digits of cadaver upper extremities, with a number of tendons left uninjured. A surgeon, blinded to the injury status of each digit, imaged each tendon by ultrasound. Predicted injury status of each tendon and localisation of the proximal stump was recorded. A total of 81 tendons were studied.

Findings

Correct diagnosis of flexor tendon injury was made in 78 of 81 tendons (96.2% success). Correct localisation of the proximal tendon stump was made in 39 of 50 lacerated tendons (78% success). Small finger injuries were most difficult to assess (66.7% success). With the small finger excluded from our analysis, the localisation success rate increased to 86.8%. The average time taken to image each digit was just under 2.5min.

Conclusions

Surgeon-performed ultrasound evaluation of the hand is a reliable means to diagnose flexor tendon injuries and to accurately localise the proximal tendon ends. This imaging modality may limit the need for extensive surgical exploration during flexor tendon repair. We do not recommend using this technique to image flexor tendon injuries of the small finger at this time.

Keywords: Flexor tendon, Ultrasound, Surgeon, Cadaver

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 None of the authors who have contributed to this manuscript have any financial interests to disclose.

PII: S1748-6815(10)00261-5

doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2010.04.035

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 64, Issue 2 , Pages 234-239, February 2011