Journal Home
Search for

Articles in Press

Return to articles in press list

Aesthetic aspects of reconstructive clitoroplasty in females with bladder exstrophy–epispadias complex

Brian A. VanderBrinka, Jeffrey A. Stockb, Moneer K. HannaabcCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 24 August 2009; accepted 1 February 2010. published online 19 March 2010.
Corrected Proof

Summary 

Background

Genital anomalies in females born with classic bladder exstrophy–epispadias complex (EEC) include a bifid clitoris and anterior displacement of vagina. The aesthetic aspects of the genitals acquire greater significance with age and may affect self-esteem. We review our experience with clitoral reconstruction in an EEC population with an emphasis on aesthetic outcomes.

Methods

The study group had 26 female patients; three patients with isolated epispadias and 23 with bladder exstrophy. The patients were separated into four separate groups based on reconstructive technique. Group 1 (n=3) had tubularisation of skin between clitoral bodies for urethral reconstruction; group 2 (n=12) underwent staged exstrophy reconstruction; group 3 (n=8) had initial surgery elsewhere and were referred for secondary reconstructive surgery with clitoroplasty accompanied by puboplasty to reconstruct the fourchette; and group 4 (n=3) had total urogenital sinus mobilisation. The aesthetic outcome was assessed subjectively by the surgeon, parent and age-appropriate patient during follow-up.

Results

A total of 33 clitoroplasties were performed. Primary clitoroplasty was performed in 18 patients, while a secondary clitoroplasty was done in 15. The follow-up ranged from 3 months to 31 years. Three patients had partial clitoral atrophy and in one patient the gap between clitoral bodies was widely separated and incapable of being joined. Twenty-three of the26 patients (88%) had a satisfactory or excellent aesthetic outcome following clitoroplasty.

Conclusions

Excellent aesthetic outcomes can be achieved by clitoroplasty in EEC patients by using a variety of surgical techniques. We recommend a ‘second look’ reassessment near puberty to identify poor cosmesis and offer secondary clitoroplasty to improve aesthetic outcome.

a Department of Pediatric Urology, Schneider's Children Hospital, New Hyde Park, New York, USA

b Department of Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA

c Department of Pediatric Urology, New York Hospital-Cornell University, New York, NY, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. 101 Old Short Hills Road, Suite 203, West Orange, NJ 07052, USA. Tel.: +1 973 325 7188; fax: +1 973 325 7409.

 Presented at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association, Orlando, FL, USA.

PII: S1748-6815(10)00076-8

doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2010.02.005