Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 63, Issue 12 , Pages 2160-2167, December 2010

Osteogenic capacity of vascularised periosteum: An experimental study on mandibular irradiated bone in rabbits

  • Jacques Yachouh

      Affiliations

    • Oral and maxillo-facial surgery department, Hôpital Lapeyronie, 371 avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5 France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +33677791421; fax: +33467336841.
  • ,
  • Pierre Breton

      Affiliations

    • Oral and maxillo-facial department, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, 69495 Pierre-Bénite Cedex France
  • ,
  • Jean-Paul Roux

      Affiliations

    • Inserm Research Unit 831, faculté de Medecine Laennec rue G. Paradin, 69372 Lyon cedex 08 France
  • ,
  • Patrick Goudot

      Affiliations

    • Oral and maxillo-facial surgery department, Hôpital Lapeyronie, 371 avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5 France

Received 21 July 2008; accepted 19 January 2010. published online 02 March 2010.

Summary 

Background

Free flaps are presently the best way to treat advanced mandibular ostonecrosis. Nevertheless, the functional and morphological results can be improved. To avoid a mandibular resection, a free periosteal flap was envisioned. In a preliminary study, the authors opted for a pedicled periosteal flap and evaluated the effect of the latter on regeneration of a rabbit irradiated mandibular bone.

Methods

Two bone fragments were taken from the basilar part of the mandible of 15 rabbits through skin incision. Those fragments were then exposed to a 30-Gy irradiation. One bone fragment was implanted in a pedicled periosteal flap elevated from the medial aspect of the femur while the other was subcutaneously fixed as a control. We retrieved the fragments at day 10, 20, 30 and 90 to make a histological analysis without prior decalcification using histomorphometry technique.

Results

In the periosted fragments, an increased osteoblastic and osteoclastic activity as well as neovascularisation evoked intense remodelling. In the subcutaneous fragments, bone resorption was much more important than osteogenesis and vessels were absent.

Conclusion

We have concluded than periosteum, which has already been proven to be efficient in normal bone regeneration, can be just as such efficient in irradiated bone regeneration.

Keywords: Periosteum, Bone, Regeneration, Osteonecrosis, Rabbit

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This article was presented at: XXVIII Congress of French Association of Maxillo-Facial Surgeons Annual Congress of Swiss Society of Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

PII: S1748-6815(10)00050-1

doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2010.01.015

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 63, Issue 12 , Pages 2160-2167, December 2010