Revision of pharyngeal flaps causing obstructive airway symptoms: An analysis of treatment with three different techniques over 39 years

Por, Yong-Chen; Tan, Ying-Chien; Chang, Frank Chun-Shin; Chen, Philip Kuo-Ting

doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2009.04.010

« Previous Next »Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 63, Issue 6 , Pages 930-933, June 2010

Revision of pharyngeal flaps causing obstructive airway symptoms: An analysis of treatment with three different techniques over 39 years

Yong-Chen Por
- Cleft and Craniofacial Centre, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Kandang Kerbau Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
Ying-Chien Tan
- Cleft and Craniofacial Centre, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Kandang Kerbau Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
Frank Chun-Shin Chang
- Craniofacial Center, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taiwan
Philip Kuo-Ting Chen
- Craniofacial Center, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taiwan
- Corresponding author. Division of Craniofacial Surgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, 5 Fu-Hsin Street, Guei Shan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan. Tel.: +886 33273726; fax: +886 33271029.

Received 25 November 2008; accepted 15 April 2009. published online 18 May 2009.

Summary

Background

Pharyngeal flaps are used to treat velopharyngeal insufficiency. Occasionally the flap exceeds its intended function and results in an obstructive airway. In this article, the results of management of these cases are analysed.

Methods

This is a 39-year retrospective review of patients who had revision of pharyngeal flaps causing obstructive airway symptoms. Three methods of relieving the airway obstruction were used, and the patients were thus separated into three groups, namely group 1 (release and Z-plasty of the lateral ports), group 2 (division of the pharyngeal flap) and group 3 (division of the pharyngeal flap combined with Furlow palatoplasty). The results obtained were based on four parameters: symptomatic improvement, velopharyngeal sufficiency, the presence of re-attachment of the pharyngeal flap and the necessity for re-operation. These results were then pooled into two groups: ‘good result’ and ‘bad result’. The respiratory disturbance index (RDI) was also obtained and analysed separately. Statistical analysis was performed with the Fisher's exact test and the paired t-test in SPSS v.11.

Results

A total of 44 patients were included in the study. There were 20, 11 and 13 patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The Pearson's chi-square test indicated that group 3 patients had a statistically significant proportion of ‘good results’ when compared to groups 1 (p=0.019) and 2 (p=0.004). There was a statistically significant reduction in RDI in group 3 (p=0.003). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups 1 and 2.

Conclusions

Division of a pharyngeal flap for obstructive airway complications should be accompanied by a Furlow palatoplasty to reduce the myriad complications that arise from either a release+Z-plasty or a simple division of the pharyngeal flap.

Keywords: Pharyngeal flap revision, Obstructive airway, Furlow palatoplasty