Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 63, Issue 4 , Pages 642-647, April 2010

Gluteal artery perforator flap: a viable alternative for sacral radiation ulcer and osteoradionecrosis

Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei Medical Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134 Shinchon-Dong, Seodaemun-Gu, 120-752, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Received 20 November 2008; accepted 30 January 2009. published online 06 April 2009.

Summary 

Radiotherapy is a crucial part in the treatment of cancer; however, it may cause adverse effects to normal tissue such as radiation-induced ulcer and osteoradionecrosis. The few cases of conservative management that were reported had a limited value and unsatisfactory results. The most reliable method to treat sacral radiation ulcer and osteoradionecrosis is a wide excision of the affected tissue, followed by coverage with well-vascularised tissue. Musculocutaneous free flaps and local gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flaps have been used; however, there were many drawbacks such as dissection of recipient vessel in the previously radiated area and donor-site morbidity. During a 4-year time period at our institute, we found favourable clinical results using gluteal artery perforator procedure for radiation-induced ulcers and osteoradionecrosis of the sacral area.

The 10 patients, who were treated with gluteal artery perforator flaps, had chronic non-healing radiation ulcers or bone exposure of the sacrum. Intra-operatively, massive debridement of bone and soft tissue was performed, while the well-vascularised skin with only a colour change was preserved. The flap was designed to include two or more perforators using Doppler flowmetry and the perforators were preserved with surrounding subcutaneous tissue during the flap elevation. The mean post-operative follow-up period was 25.7 months. As regards the surgery, there was one major complication (of partial flap loss) and three minor complications (of wound dehiscence). In the patient with partial flap loss due to infection and a floating flap, the contralateral superior gluteal artery perforator flap was used to treat complications. Other complications were conservatively treated and well healed.

Gluteal perforator flaps are a valuable alternative in treating sacral radiation ulcers and osteoradionecrosis. Sufficient excision of devitalised tissue is a crucial procedure to achieve optimal results.

Keywords: Gluteal artery perforator, Perforator flaps, Radiation ulcer, Osteoradionecrosis, Sacrum

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1748-6815(09)00190-9

doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2009.01.081

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 63, Issue 4 , Pages 642-647, April 2010