Journal Home
Search for

Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages 648-654 (April 2010)


View previous. 12 of 53 View next.

Performing two DIEP flaps in a working day: an achievable and reproducible practice

Rafael AcostaaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Morteza Enajata, Warren M. Rozenb, Jeroen M. Smitac, Marcus J.D. Wagstaffd, Iain S. Whitakere, Thorir Audolfssona

Received 18 October 2008; accepted 5 January 2009. published online 16 March 2009.

Summary 

Background

While the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is a reliable technique for autologous breast reconstruction, the meticulous dissection of perforators may require lengthy operative times. In our unit, we have performed 600 free flaps for breast reconstruction over 8 years and have reduced operative times with a combination of preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA), various anastomotic techniques and the Cook–Swartz implantable Doppler probe for perfusion monitoring. We sought to assess the feasibility of performing two DIEP flaps within the working hours of a single day.

Methods

A review of 101 consecutive patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction in a 12-month period was performed, comparing one DIEP flap per day (n=43) to two DIEP flaps per day (n=58). Complications, outcomes and techniques used were critically analysed. For cases of two DIEP flaps per day, a comparison was made between the use of two separate operating theatres (n=44) and a single consecutive theatre (n=14).

Results

Complications did not increase when two DIEP flaps were performed in a single working day. The use of vascular closure staple (VCS) sutures and ring couplers resulted in statistically significant reductions in anastomotic times. The use of two separate theatres for performing two DIEP flaps resulted in a reduction of 59min in operative time per case (p=0.004).

Conclusion

Two DIEP flaps can be safely and routinely performed within the hours of a single working day. By minimising operative times, these techniques can improve productivity and substantially decrease surgeon fatigue.

a Department of Plastic Surgery, Uppsala Clinic Hospital, Uppsala, 75185, Sweden

b Jack Brockhoff Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Research Unit, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

c Department of Plastic Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

d Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

e Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, The Welsh National Plastic Surgery Unit, The Morriston Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +46 18611 0000; fax: +46 1829 1001.

PII: S1748-6815(09)00069-2

doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2009.01.015


View previous. 12 of 53 View next.