Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 62, Issue 11 , Pages 1464-1469, November 2009

Preoperative planning for DIEP breast reconstruction: early experience of the use of computerised tomography angiography with VoNavix 3D software for perforator navigation

  • M.D. Pacifico

      Affiliations

    • Department of Plastic Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, Holtye Road, East Grinstead, West Sussex RH19 3DZ, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 01342 414000; fax: +44 01342 414121.
  • ,
  • M.S. See

      Affiliations

    • Department of Plastic Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, Holtye Road, East Grinstead, West Sussex RH19 3DZ, UK
  • ,
  • N. Cavale

      Affiliations

    • Department of Plastic Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, Holtye Road, East Grinstead, West Sussex RH19 3DZ, UK
  • ,
  • J. Collyer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, Holtye Road, East Grinstead, West Sussex RH19 3DZ, UK
  • ,
  • I. Francis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Queen Victoria Hospital, Holtye Road, East Grinstead, West Sussex RH19 3DZ, UK
  • ,
  • M.E. Jones

      Affiliations

    • Department of Plastic Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, Holtye Road, East Grinstead, West Sussex RH19 3DZ, UK
  • ,
  • A. Hazari

      Affiliations

    • Department of Plastic Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, Holtye Road, East Grinstead, West Sussex RH19 3DZ, UK
  • ,
  • J.G. Boorman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Plastic Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, Holtye Road, East Grinstead, West Sussex RH19 3DZ, UK
  • ,
  • R.W. Smith

      Affiliations

    • Department of Plastic Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, Holtye Road, East Grinstead, West Sussex RH19 3DZ, UK

Received 19 December 2007; accepted 19 April 2008. published online 19 August 2008.

Summary 

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is normally the first choice in breast reconstruction; however, due to the considerable vascular anatomical variation and the learning curve for the procedure, muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps are still frequently performed to reduce the rate of complications. Accurate preoperative investigation of the perforators would allow better operative preparation and possibly shorten the learning curve.

In an effort to increase accuracy of preoperative planning and to aid preoperative decision-making in free abdominal flap breast reconstruction, we have acquired the use of VoNavix, software that creates three dimensional images from computerised tomography angiography (CTA) data. The use of the VoNavix software for analysis of CTA provides superior imaging that can be viewed in theatre. It, together with CTA, enables decisions to be made preoperatively, including: which side to raise the flap; whether to aim for a medial or lateral row perforator; whether to take a segment of muscle and whether to expect an easy or difficult dissection.

We have now performed over 60 free abdominal flap breast reconstructions aided with CTA, and 10 of these cases also used VoNavix technology. This paper presents our initial experience with the use of this software, illustrated with three patient examples. The advantages and disadvantages are discussed.

Keywords: DIEP, CTA, 3D analysis, Perforator, Breast reconstruction, TRAM

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1748-6815(08)00647-5

doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2008.04.056

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 62, Issue 11 , Pages 1464-1469, November 2009