| | The ad hoc perforator flap for contracture release☆Received 23 August 2006; accepted 28 June 2007. published online 17 August 2007. Summary Release and autografting remains a mainstay of treatment of cutaneous and joint-associated contractures. However, owing to secondary contraction of grafts and the increase of children undergoing burn reconstructive surgery, recurrence of contractures is not uncommon. Locally available, well-vascularised tissue that will contract minimally and grow with the patient is the ideal for contracture release. Many ‘predesigned’ cutaneous flaps have been described, but use of these may involve tailoring a defect to fit a known flap. We introduce the concept of the ‘ad hoc’ perforator flap, an improvised island flap based on a perforator, innominate or otherwise, that happens to be adjacent to a particular soft-tissue defect and can be reliably raised on scarred skin. We carried out a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing contracture release within our unit. Twenty-three ad-hoc perforator flaps in 20 patients were carried out between 2000 and 2005. Eleven of the 20 patients were children, and all but one case was subsequent to a burn injury. Fifteen of the 23 flaps were upper limb. In one case, a significant complication involving total flap loss occurred. Only one patient required a skin graft to close the flap donor site, and no patients required revisional surgery for contracture recurrence. The ad hoc perforator flap is a safe and simple technique for the management of contractures, and fulfils the ideal of well-vascularised tissue that can grow with the patient. The flap can be designed as required and, with experience, the concept is applicable not only to contracture release, but many other reconstructive scenarios. The mainstay of treatment for people with problematic, often joint-associated contractures is release and skin-grafting. This technique, although simple and often effective, is limited by the tendency of skin grafts to contract, thus resulting in partial or total recurrence of the original problem. This may be compounded in children by the potentially distorting effects of growth and their increased tendency to form hypertrophic scars.1 Local or regional tissue transfer represents a ‘step up’ the reconstructive ladder. Many such flaps have been described for contracture release. Local random fasciocutaneous flaps have proven useful in many situations,2 but their usefulness may be limited by an unsightly donor site that may require split-skin grafting for closure,2 and restricted movement owing to the constraints of the fixed pedicle.3 An improved understanding of the blood supply of the skin, based on the work of groups such as Cormack and Lamberty,4 and Taylor and Palmer,5 has led to the development of many perforator-based fascial and fasciocutaneous flaps for use in areas such as the leg,6, 7 patellar region,3 axilla,8 elbow9 and forearm.10 From vascular studies, it is important to note that the system of cutaneous perforators is concentrated around the mid-lateral and mid-medial lines of the limbs and trunk, and particularly around joints.5, 11 Such vessels are therefore ideally placed to be included in flap design when dealing with joint contractures. Soft-tissue defects, occurring either after excision, trauma or burns, happen at random. However, most reconstructive surgeons continue to rely on flaps of preconceived designs to provide cover. With increased understanding of the cutaneous circulation, a working knowledge of the regional vascular anatomy and expertise in raising local skin flaps, the reconstructive surgeon can be released from the constraints of tailoring the defect ‘to a previously described local flap’. Flaps can be based on perforators that have not necessarily been previously described. The term ‘ad hoc’ has been used to describe these flaps.12, 13 An ‘ad hoc’ perforator flap is an improvised island flap based on a perforator, innominate or otherwise, that happens to be adjacent to a particular soft-tissue defect. The presence of a positive Doppler signal in any potential donor territory adjacent to a given defect is a reliable indicator of the presence and potential skin territory of a perforator.11 This allows on-table design of a reconstructive option for a given soft-tissue defect. Identification of an individual perforator allows islanding of the flap, and, in most situations, primary closure of the donor site. This avoids the donor site issues associated with some random pattern, non-islanded flaps. The ‘ad hoc’ concept may be thought of as analogous to that of the ‘free-style’ free flap as proposed by Wei and Mardini.14 Methods  Surgical technique Careful Doppler mapping, preliminary exploration, or both, are carried out to identify a perforator adjacent to the contracture to be released. The site of such a perforator is the would-be pivot point of the flap. A non-committal exploratory incision is then made adjacent to the defect to be reconstructed, and the skin and soft tissues are raised at a fasciocutaneous level (Fig. 1). Through this wound, the perforator that was the origin of the positive Doppler signal is sought. Once the perforator is identified, two issues need to be considered. First, the direction the perforator takes after piercing the fascia and, second, its potential vascular territory. This is essential for correct planning and design of the flap. Loupe magnification is usually sufficient to identify the direction of the perforator and, in the extremities, it is usually safer to design an island flap in which the perforator enters the flap distally. This allows transposition of the flap from proximal to distal. Determining the potential vascular territory of the flap is a matter of fine judgment. Factors to consider include the size of the perforator and also the presence of any other significant adjacent perforators that would, by necessity, be sacrificed in order to facilitate the transfer of the flap as an island. The greater the number of perforators in an area, the less the size of the potential territory of individual perforators.11 If a flap is particularly large (i.e. in Fig. 1), a non-crushing intestinal clamp is applied to make sure that the circulation at the distal margin is adequate. Once this is verified, the flap can be completely islanded and transposed. With careful planning, most donor sites can be closed primarily, although a split-skin graft may be required in some circumstances. The maximum flap dimensions achievable are unclear. The largest flap length to width ratio in this study is approximately 5:1 (Fig. 2). Patients A retrospective case-note and photographic analysis was carried out for all patients undergoing burn or joint contracture release by the senior author at St Johns Hospital, Livingston or the Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh between the years 2000 and 2005. Twenty patients who had contracture release and reconstruction with a total of 23 ad-hoc perforator flaps were identified. All patients had release of burn contractures, with the exception of one patient who had an axillary contracture secondary to debridement and skin-grafting of a necrotising infection. The locations of the flap reconstructions can be seen in Table 1. Most (15 of 23) involve the upper extremity. Eleven of the 20 patients were children (median age 12 years, range 8–15 years). The median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1–12 days). Many of the cases would have been suitable for day-case surgery, but were kept overnight owing to long travelling distances between the hospital and their home. All donor sites were closed primarily, apart from one patient who required a split-skin graft to close the donor site. One significant complication occurred, which involved complete flap loss secondary to unrecognised intraoperative damage to the pedicle (Fig. 3). Had this been recognised at the time of surgery, the salvage option would have been to thin the flap and replace it as a full-thickness skin graft. This would also be the salvage option if no reliable perforator can be found. One patient experienced significant hypertrophic scarring at the donor site, and another required liposuction and thinning of a moderately bulky flap. Median follow-up was 9 months (range 2 months to 5 years). No patient has required revisional surgery for contracture recurrence where this technique has been used. Examples  Axilla The patient in Fig. 4 had a moderate anterior axillary fold contracture, which was interfering with shoulder abduction. An ad-hoc perforator flap has been raised and rotated 180° into the defect. Cubital fossa The technique has been found to be particularly useful around the cubital fossa. A patient with an ad-hoc perforator flap raised on partially scarred skin from the superolateral aspect of the left cubital fossa is shown in Fig. 5. Trunk This man had an old burn to the right flank with an extensive grafted area causing a sheet contracture. The tightest area of the contracture was released and interposed with an ad-hoc perforator flap raised on partially scarred skin (Fig. 2a,b). However, a previously skin-grafted area at the lower aspect of the right flank has contracted with time, whereas the perforator flap has stretched with time (Fig. 2c). Popliteal fossa This young man (Fig. 6) had a longitudinal, unstable post-burn contracture across the lateral limit of the right popliteal fossa, limiting full extension of the knee. An ad-hoc perforator flap was raised on the posterior thigh skin and rotated 90° into the defect resulting from contracture release. A full range of knee movement was achieved after surgery. Multiple flaps Where indicated, it is easy to carry out more than one flap at the same time. This 8-year old child (Fig. 7) has a large longitudinal contracture stretching from the iliac crest to the axilla. Three ad-hoc flaps have been designed to break up the contracture at three levels. Postoperative healing was uneventful. Discussion  Incisional or excisional release of burn contractures followed by skin autografting has been the traditional treatment in burn reconstructive surgery for many years. However with modern advances, local or regional flaps are now considered as a first choice in many situations. The provision of well-vascularised tissue to the area gives the best functional and cosmetic result. In our unit, the ad-hoc perforator flap has proven to be a useful, safe, and with experience, relatively simple technique for the release of post-burn contractures. Although not included in this series, we have found that once a surgeon is confident with the technique, it can be applied to other reconstructive scenarios. This technique is particularly useful in children, as it can be used to import normal skin into the area of a released contracture. Contracture recurrence should therefore be limited, as this skin will grow with the child and undergo significantly less secondary contracture than would be expected of a skin graft. In practice, we have found that interposing a local flap to interrupt a contracture can result in expansion or stretching of the flap rather than any secondary contracture. For simple linear burn contractures where there is little or no deficiency of local tissue, excision and direct closure or Z–plasties or Y–V plasties may be carried out. Most of our series comprised patients who had sheet or broad contractures with a deficiency of immediately local tissues. It is in these patients that we feel an ad-hoc perforator flap is particularly indicated. It can be raised on scarred tissue as long as great care is taken raising the flap and the scarred skin remains attached to the underlying tissues. In all but one case, the flap donor site was closed primarily, therefore avoiding any skin-grafting procedure. This is important both physically and psychologically for many patients and families who may have already experienced multiple grafting procedures around the time of the initial injury or resultant reconstructive procedures. The avoidance of the need for skin-grafting also facilitates day case or short-stay surgery, which is desirable for children. Many descriptions of the use of flaps similar to those outlined in our series have been published. It is undoubtedly useful for a surgeon to have a ‘mental atlas’ of potential reconstructive options; however, our aim in this paper is to not to present a review or surgical atlas, but to highlight the ‘ad hoc’ concept and illustrate how its use can allow the reconstructive surgeon freedom of design when faced with a reconstructive problem, thus continuing our specialty's tradition of innovative thinking. The dictionary defines ‘ad hoc’ as a term for something that is ‘used on a particular occasion’ or something that has ‘an improvised nature’. By definition, an ad-hoc perforator flap can be based on any type of perforator. Its concept was first alluded to by the senior author in 1990.12 It can be based on the subfascial location of any of the 300 or more major perforators of the body as mapped by Taylor and Palmer.5, 11 With the ‘ad hoc’ concept, one need not dwell over anatomical landmarks or anatomical variations. The knowledge and importance of any flap source vessel becomes essentially irrelevant. The simple presence of a Doppler signal in a territory adjacent to the defect, coupled with a surgeon's thorough understanding of the blood supply of the tissues, allows safe ‘ad hoc’ planning and execution of the flap. References  1. 1Kraemer M, Jones T, Deitch E. Burn contractures: incidence, predisposing factors, and results of surgical therapy. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1988;9:261–265. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
2. 2Hallock GG. Local random fasciocutaneous flaps for repair of the burned elbow. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1991;12:26–32. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
3. 3Misra A, Niranjan NS. Fasciocutaneous flaps based on fascial feeder and perforator vessels for defects in the patellar and peripatellar regions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1625–1632.
CrossRef
4. 4Cormack G, Lamberty B. A classification of fascio-cutaneous flaps according to their patterns of vascularisation. Br J Plast Surg. 1984;37:80–87. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (658 KB)
|
CrossRef
5. 5Taylor GI, Palmer JH. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40:113–141. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (3518 KB)
|
CrossRef
6. 6Niranjan NS, Price RD, Govilkar P. Fascial feeder and perforator-based V–Y advancement flaps in the reconstruction of lower limb defects. Br J Plast Surg. 2000;53:679–689. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (18221 KB)
|
CrossRef
7. 7Venkataramakrishnan V, Mohan D, Villafane O. Perforator based V–Y advancement flaps in the leg. Br J Plast Surg. 1998;51:431–435. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (8593 KB)
|
CrossRef
8. 8Geh JLC, Niranjan NS. Perforator-based fasciocutaneous island flaps for the reconstruction of axillary defects following excision of hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Plast Surg. 2002;55:124–128. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (8635 KB)
|
CrossRef
9. 9Davalbhakta AV, Niranjan NS. Fasciocutaneous flaps based on fascial feeding vessels for defects in the peri-olecranon area. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:60–63. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (497 KB)
|
CrossRef
10. 10Yii NW, Niranjan NS. Fascial flaps based on perforators for reconstruction of defects in the distal forearm. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:534–540. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (1583 KB)
|
CrossRef
11. 11Taylor GI, Doyle M, McCarten G. The Doppler probe for planning flaps: anatomical study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg. 1990;43:1–16.
Full-Text PDF (534 KB)
|
CrossRef
12. 12Quaba AA, Davison PM. The distally-based dorsal hand flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1990;43:28–39. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (1072 KB)
|
CrossRef
13. 13Quaba O, Quaba AA. Pedicled perforator flaps for the lower limb. Semin Plast Surg. 2006;20:103–111. 14. 14Wei FC, Mardini S. Free-style free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:910–916. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
a Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB25 2ZN, UK b Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh and St Johns Hospital, Livingston, Scotland, UK Corresponding author.
☆ Part of this work was presented at the British Association of Plastic Surgeons Summer Meeting, Windsor, July 8 2005. PII: S1748-6815(07)00367-1 doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2007.06.026 © 2007 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | |
|