Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 61, Issue 1 , Pages 18-30 , January 2008

Automatic three-dimensional quantitative analysis for evaluation of facial movement

Received 17 October 2006 ,Accepted 15 March 2007.

References 

  1. Adour KK, Swanson PJ. Facial paralysis in 403 consecutive patients: emphasis on treatment response in patients with Bell's palsy. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1971;75:1284–1301
  2. House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985;93:146–147
  3. Ross BG, Fradet G, Nedzelski JM. Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;114:380–386
  4. Coulson SE, Croxon GR, Adams RD, et al. Reliability of the “Sidney”, “Sunnybrook”, and “House Brackman” facial grading systems to assess voluntary movement and synkinesis after facial nerve paralysis. Otolaryngol Head and Neck Surg. 2005;132:543–549
  5. Coulson SE, Croxson GR, Gilleard WL. Three-dimensional quantification of points during normal facial movement. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999;108:265–268
  6. Frey M, Jenny A, Giovanoli P, et al. Development of a new documentation system for facial movements as a basis for the international registry for neuromuscular reconstruction in the face. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:1334–1349
  7. Isono M, Murata K, Tanaka H, et al. An objective evaluation method for facial mimic motion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;114:27–31
  8. Johnson PC, Brown H, Kuzon WM, et al. Simultaneous quantitation of facial movements: the maximal static response assay of facial nerve function. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32:171–179
  9. Linstrom CJ, Silverman CA, Susman WM. Facial-motion analysis with a video and computer system: a preliminary report. Am J Otol. 2000;21:123–129
  10. Wachsman GS, Cohn JF, VanSwearingen JM, et al. Automated tracking of facial features in patients with facial neuromuscular dysfunction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1124–1133
  11. Sargent EW, Fadhli OA, Cohen RS. Measurement of facial movement with computer software. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:313–318
  12. Neely JG, Cheung JY, Wood M, et al. Computerized quantitative dynamic analysis of facial motion in the paralyzed and synkinetic face. Am J Otol. 1992;13:97–107
  13. Meier-Gallati V, Scriba H, Fisch U. Objective scaling of facial nerve function based on area analysis (OSCAR). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;118:545–550
  14. Yuen K, Kawakami S, Ogawara T, et al. Evaluation of facial palsy by Moire topography. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Suppl. 1994;S541–S544
  15. Tomat LR, Manktelow RT. Evaluation of a new measurement tool for facial paralysis reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:696–704
  16. García-Alsina J, García Almazán C, Moranta J, et al. Angular position, range of motion and velocity of arm elevation: a study of consistency of performance. Clin Biomech. 2005;20:932–938
  17. Frey M, Giovanoli P, Gerber H, et al. Three-dimensional video analysis of facial movements: a new method to assess the quantity and quality of the smile. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:2032–2039
  18. House JW. Facial nerve grading systems. Laryngoscope. 1983;93:1056–1069
  19. Burres SA, Fisch U. The comparison of facial grading systems. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;112:755–758
  20. Croxson G, May M, Mester SJ. Grading facial nerve function: House-Brackmann versus Burres-Fisch methods. Am J Otolaryngol. 1990;11:240–246
  21. Holman ML, Neely JG, Joaquin AH. Computer-assisted clinometric tool for the study of facial expression: a pilot validity study. Laryngoscope. 1996;106:135–138
  22. Scriba H, Stoeckli S, Veraguth D, et al. Objective evaluation of normal facial function. Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999;108:641–644
  23. Frey M, Jenny A, Stussi E, et al. Development of a new paresis scoring system for pre- and postoperative evaluation of facial paresis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Suppl. 1994;S182–S184
  24. Burres SA. Facial biomechanics: the standards of normal. Laryngoscope. 1985;95:708–714
  25. Burres SA. Objective grading of facial paralysis. Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol Laryngol. 1986;95:238–241
  26. Fields MJ, Peckitt NS. Facial nerve function index: a clinical measurement of facial nerve activity in patients with facial nerve palsies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;69:681–682
  27. Paletz JL, Manktelow RT, Chaban R. The shape of a normal smile: implications for facial paralysis reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:784–789
  28. Wood DA, Hughes GB, Secic M, et al. Objective measurement of normal facial movement with video microscaling. Am J Otolaryngol. 1994;15:61–65
  29. Linstrom CJ. Objective facial motion analysis in patients with facial nerve dysfunction. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:1129–1147

☆ This work has been presented at:IX International Course in Microsurgery, 14–16 October 2005, Botucatu, Brazil.XLI Spanish National Congress of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, 10–13 May 2006, Pamplona, Spain.XXXVII German National Congress of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, 29 September–2 October 2006, Aachen, Germany.IX Spanish National Congress in Microsurgery, 3rd November 2006, Barcelona, Spain.

PII: S1748-6815(07)00264-1

doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.03.037

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 61, Issue 1 , Pages 18-30 , January 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution