Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 60, Issue 8 , Pages 888-891, August 2007

The keystone design perforator island flap. Part II: clinical applications

  • Philippe Pelissier

      Affiliations

    • Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Hôpital Pellegrin-Tondu, 33076 Bordeaux, France
    • Laboratoire d'Anatomie, Université Bordeaux2 – UFR 2, 146, rue Léo Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Hôpital Pellegrin-Tondu, Place Amelie Raba-Leon, 33076 Bordeaux, France. Tel.: +33 5 56 79 55 48; fax: +33 5 56 79 56 87.
  • ,
  • Hélène Gardet

      Affiliations

    • Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Hôpital Pellegrin-Tondu, 33076 Bordeaux, France
  • ,
  • Vincent Pinsolle

      Affiliations

    • Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Hôpital Pellegrin-Tondu, 33076 Bordeaux, France
  • ,
  • Max Santoul

      Affiliations

    • Collège Français de Chirurgie Dermatologique, 16, Avenue d'Iena 75016 Paris, France
  • ,
  • Felix C. Behan

      Affiliations

    • Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Unit, Western Hospital, Footscray Victoria, Australia
    • Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Australia

Received 30 October 2006; accepted 20 March 2007. published online 11 May 2007.

Summary 

Background

This curvilinear- and trapezoidal-shaped flap essentially consists of two conjoined V–Y flaps end to side. The vascular supply is supported by the subcutaneous vascular network and is dependent on fascial and muscular perforators. A review of 15 clinical cases was performed to assess the reliability and versatility of the flap.

Methods

Twelve keystone flaps were performed following excision of skin tumours or post-traumatic defects in various locations, from the head and neck region, the trunk and the limbs.

Results

No flap necrosis, even partial, was observed regardless of the site and the type of keystone used. Patients were almost pain free in the postoperative course. The aesthetic results are quite satisfactory, as the flap is aligned locally without evidence of the ‘pincushioning’ appearance sometimes seen around island reconstructions.

Discussion

Elevation of the flap seems to evenly distribute the tensional forces without undermining. The flap is particularly useful in the repair of defects following skin cancer removal. Bulk is not a problem and good skin cover is achieved.

Conclusion

The presence of perforators and subcutaneous network distributed throughout the body create an environment which makes this flap universally applicable and extremely reliable.

Keywords: Keystone, Island flap, Perforator, Surgery, Skin tumour, Trauma

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1748-6815(07)00210-0

doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2007.03.023

Refers to article:

  • The keystone design perforator island flap. Part I: Anatomic study , 24 April 2007

    Philippe Pelissier, Max Santoul, Vincent Pinsolle, Vincent Casoli, Felix Behan
    Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery August 2007 (Vol. 60, Issue 8, Pages 883-887)

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 60, Issue 8 , Pages 888-891, August 2007