Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 60, Issue 8 , Pages 876-882, August 2007

The reverse posterior interosseous flap and its composite flap: Experience with 201 flaps

  • Lai-jin Lu
  • ,
  • Xu Gong

      Affiliations

    • Department of Hand Surgery, The First Hospital of Ji Lin University, No. 1, Xin Min Street, Chang Chun, Ji Lin 130021, PR China
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +86 0431 4863906.
  • ,
  • Xin-min Lu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Hand Surgery, The Third People's Hospital of Yang Quan City, Shan Xin 045000
  • ,
  • Ke-li Wang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Hand Surgery, The First Hospital of Ji Lin University, No. 1, Xin Min Street, Chang Chun, Ji Lin 130021, PR China

Received 27 March 2006; accepted 29 November 2006. published online 02 February 2007.

Summary 

Objective

To introduce our experiences of using the reverse posterior interosseous flap and its composite flap.

Methods

In the series of 201 cases, the fasciocutaneous flap was used to cover skin defects over the distal 1/3rd forearm, wrist and hand in 174 cases. The composite flap with the vascularised ulna bone graft was used to reconstruct the thumbs in 11 cases, and with the vascularised tendon graft was used to repair tendon defects with skin defects in 16 cases. The size of the ulna graft was 3–6cm in length and 1–2cm in width. The 4–7cm tendon graft was obtained from the extensor digiti quinti or extensor carpi ulnaris. The size of the flaps ranged from 5cm×4cm to 16cm×10cm.

Results

One flap failed completely. Of the other 200 flaps which survived 16 cases had venous congestion and had partial necrosis at the distal end. The size of the necrotic area ranged from 1 to 4cm in length. Ninety-three patients were followed up for at least 6 months, and included 10 patients with composite flaps. Generally, the flap matched the surrounding skin. But 10 cases had a lipectomy. The sensibility did not recover or achieved S1 within 6 months. For the extensor tendon defect, the function of finger extension was nearly normal and tenolysis was not required. In contrast, tenolysis was required after the flexor tendon reconstruction. However, these patients refused surgery. The bone grafts were healed in 3 months. The reconstructed thumb looked abnormal and lacked normal sensibility, although the patients used them. The linear scar line was conspicuous over the dorsum of the forearm.

Conclusion

The reverse posterior interosseous flap is a reliable method to cover skin defects over the distal 1/3rd of the forearm, the wrist and hand. The composite flap with a vascularised tendon graft is an optimal reconstructive option for any extensor tendon loss (III zone) associated with a skin defect. Using the composite flap with a vascularised bone graft or combined with the digital neurovascular flap is another way to reconstruct the thumb.

Keywords: Reverse, Posterior interosseous artery, Flap, Vascularised

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1748-6815(06)00626-7

doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2006.11.024

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume 60, Issue 8 , Pages 876-882, August 2007